HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content

"Evaluation of Bowel Distention and Bowel Wall Appearance by Using Neutral Oral Contrast Agent for Multi–Detector Row CT." Radiology 2006;238(1):87–95

Page 87, first sentence of the Results section should read as follows: There was significantly better distention in the stomach (P = .013), duodenum (P = .006), jejunum (P = .029), and ileum (P = .014) in group 1 compared with group 2.

Page 91, first sentence of the second paragraph should read as follows: For qualitative analysis (Table 3), the mean values for distention in the stomach (P = .013), duodenum (P = .006), jejunum (P = .029), and ileum (P = .014) were all significantly greater in group 1 than in group 2.

Page 93, table 3, last entry in the fourth column should read .014.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content