Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2432060559
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jonisch, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jonisch, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
(Radiology 2007;243:445-450.)
© RSNA, 2007


Genitourinary Imaging

Can High-Attenuation Renal Cysts Be Differentiated from Renal Cell Carcinoma at Unenhanced CT?1

Ari I. Jonisch, MD, Ami N. Rubinowitz, MD, Pradeep G. Mutalik, MD, and Gary M. Israel, MD

1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208042, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520-8042. Received March 29, 2006; revision requested May 30; revision received June 9; accepted July 7; final version accepted September 18. Address correspondence to G.M.I. (e-mail: gary.israel{at}yale.edu).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
Purpose: To retrospectively determine if renal cell carcinoma can be differentiated from high-attenuation renal cysts at unenhanced computed tomography (CT) based on Hounsfield unit measurements and heterogeneity.

Materials and Methods: The Human Investigation Committee at our institution approved this study with waiver of informed consent. This study was compliant with the HIPAA. Fifty-four pathologically proved renal cell carcinomas in 54 patients (36 men and 18 women; average age, 53 years; range, 23–90 years) and 56 high-attenuation renal cysts in 51 patients (30 men and 21 women; average age, 63 years; range, 28–86 years) were retrospectively evaluated at unenhanced CT. Two independent readers reviewed randomized unenhanced CT images and obtained Hounsfield unit readings of each mass. A subjective determination of lesion heterogeneity was also performed by using a four-point scale (1: homogeneous, 2: mildly heterogeneous, 3: moderately heterogeneous, 4: markedly heterogeneous). Statistical analysis was performed by using Bland-Altman regression tree, classification and regression tree, and Shapiro-Wilk normality test.

Results: The average attenuation of cysts for reader 1 was 53.4 HU (range, 23–113 HU) and for reader 2 was 53.8 HU (range, 21–108 HU). The average attenuation of neoplasms for reader 1 was 34.7 HU (range, 21–60 HU) and for reader 2 was 38.4 HU (range, 22–60 HU). For cyst heterogeneity, a score of 1 was given in 55 of 56 (98%) cysts for reader 1 and in 53 of 56 (95%) cysts for reader 2. For neoplasm heterogeneity, a score of 1 was given in 35 of 54 (65%) neoplasms for reader 1 and in 36 of 54 (67%) for reader 2. Given the distribution of cyst and tumor attenuation values and lesion heterogeneity, a homogeneous mass measuring 70 HU or greater at unenhanced CT has a greater than 99.9% chance of representing a high-attenuation renal cyst.

Conclusion: The findings from this study may help differentiate high-attenuation renal cysts from renal cell carcinomas at unenhanced CT and may suggest the next appropriate imaging study for definitive characterization.

© RSNA, 2007


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
Benign renal cysts are commonly encountered at computed tomography (CT) and are easily characterized when they are well defined, homogeneous, and of water attenuation. However, some benign renal cysts may contain high-attenuation fluid (> 20 HU) and are referred to as high-attenuation renal cysts. Unfortunately, at unenhanced CT, these cysts cannot be differentiated from renal cell carcinoma because both may have similar attenuation values (1). Therefore, the incidental discovery of a renal mass that measures greater than 20 HU on unenhanced CT poses a diagnostic dilemma, and additional imaging studies (ultrasonography [US], contrast material–enhanced CT, or magnetic resonance [MR] imaging) need to be performed for definitive characterization. However, there may be some characteristics of these indeterminate masses that may be helpful in predicting the nature of the lesion. At unenhanced CT, most renal cell carcinomas have attenuation values of less than that of renal parenchyma (20–30 HU) (1) and may be heterogeneous in attenuation. Although the attenuation of high-attenuation renal cysts is variable, a recent study of 37 such cysts demonstrated that all of the cysts had higher attenuation than did unenhanced renal parenchyma (range, 45–66 HU) (2). Furthermore, greater than 97% of these cysts were homogeneous in attenuation. Thus, the purpose of our study was to retrospectively determine if renal cell carcinoma can be differentiated from high-attenuation renal cysts at unenhanced CT on the basis of the Hounsfield units value and heterogeneity.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
Patients
The Human Investigation Committee at Yale University School of Medicine approved our study with waiver of informed consent. Our study was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Our search of a pathology database at a single institution (Yale-New Haven Hospital) from January 1, 1999, through July 1, 2005, yielded 346 specimens from 346 patients with the diagnosis of a renal neoplasm. This group of patients was cross-referenced with the picture archiving and communication system (Synapse; Fuji Medical Systems, Stamford, Conn) to determine which patients had undergone preoperative imaging. In 86 patients, no imaging was performed at our institution. Of the remaining 260 patients, 161 were diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma. Of these, there were a total of 54 patients (54 renal cell carcinomas) who underwent unenhanced CT imaging of the kidneys at our institution prior to surgery. The group consisted of 36 men and 18 women (mean age: 53 years; range: 23–90 years). The average size of the neoplasms (largest axial diameter) was 4.0 cm (range: 1.3–11.2 cm). Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and von Hippel–Lindau disease were excluded.

A computerized search of radiology reports from January 1, 2001, through January 1, 2005, in our radiology information system (IDX Imagecast version 10.3.9.91; IDX Systems, Burlington, Vt) was performed for high-attenuation renal cysts. Reports were searched for CT scans of the abdomen performed with and without intravenous (IV) contrast in which "hemorrhagic cyst," "high-attenuation cyst," or "proteinaceous cyst" was used to describe a renal mass. This yielded a total of 51 patients with 56 renal masses that met these criteria. The group consisted of 30 men and 21 women (mean age: 63 years; range: 28–86 years). The average size of the renal cyst (largest axial diameter) was 1.8 cm (range: 1.0–6.1 cm). Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease or von Hippel–Lindau disease were excluded.

CT Technique
All CT examinations were performed on helical scanners. For the renal neoplasms, the scanners used were as follows: CTi (n = 15), LightSpeed (four-section) (n = 30), and LightSpeed (16-section) (n = 9) (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wis). The section collimation for the renal neoplasms varied (10 mm, n = 1; 7 mm, n = 4; 5 mm, n = 19, 3.75 mm, n = 1; 2.5 mm, n = 29). For the renal cysts, the scanners used were as follows: CTi (n = 6), LightSpeed (four-section) (n = 39), and LightSpeed (16-section) (n = 6) (GE Healthcare). The section collimation for the high-attenuation renal cysts varied (10 mm, n = 4; 5 mm, n = 25; 2.5 mm, n = 27). For the high-attenuation renal cysts, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images were performed by using the same parameters (peak voltage, milliampere-second, and section collimation) for both series. The contrast-enhanced images were obtained after 150 mL of IV iohexol (Omnipaque 300, Nycomed Amersham, Princeton, NJ) injected at 4 mL/sec and a scan delay of 70–100 seconds.

Image Interpretation
A single author (G.M.I.) with 10 years experience in genitourinary CT reviewed the high-attenuation renal cysts on the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced examinations to confirm their diagnosis. Region of interest (ROI) measurements (to obtain Hounsfield unit readings) from similar locations of the cysts were performed for both acquisitions. A high-attenuation cyst was confirmed if the change in attenuation (from the unenhanced to the contrast-enhanced images) was 10 HU or less (3).

Two readers (A.I.J. and A.N.R., with 2 and 10 years experience in body CT image interpretation, respectively), who were blinded to the final diagnoses, independently reviewed the randomized unenhanced CT images of the renal neoplasms and high-attenuation renal cysts. To avoid confusion with other lesions in the kidneys, the readers were made aware of the location of the lesions of interest. For each lesion, manually defined circular or oval ROI measurements were performed on the unenhanced CT images to obtain attenuation readings. For homogeneous lesions, the ROI included as much of the lesion as possible. For heterogeneous lesions, the largest possible ROI was placed on the portion of the lesion that subjectively had the highest attenuation. If a lesion contained calcification, this was avoided in the ROI analysis. The internal heterogeneity of each lesion was also subjectively determined by viewing the lesion with routine abdominal window and level settings and by using a four-point scale of 1 (homogeneous), 2 (mildly heterogeneous, characterized by slight mottling), 3 (moderately heterogeneous, characterized by small foci of high and low attenuation), and 4 (markedly heterogeneous, characterized by large foci of mixed attenuation).

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis involving standard parametric and nonparametric tests was performed using the software package Analyze-It version 1.73 (Analyze-It Software, Leeds, England), a statistical add-on for Microsoft Excel. Classification and regression tree analysis (CART) was performed by using CART software version 5.0 (Salford Systems, San Diego, Calif, 2006). The purpose of the statistical analysis was twofold: (a) to determine the agreement between the two readers and (b) to formulate a clinical guideline that would allow differentiation of a high-attenuation cyst from a renal cell carcinoma with a high degree of confidence if the appropriate criteria were satisfied.

For determining agreement, Bland-Altman regression analysis (4) was carried out for attenuation, the continuous variable, for both the high-attenuation cysts and tumors. The weighted {kappa} statistic was used for internal heterogeneity, the categoric variable. The degree of observer agreement as indicated by {kappa} values was interpreted as follows: 0–0.20 = slight agreement; 0.21–0.40 = fair agreement; 0.41–0.60 = moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80 = substantial agreement; and 0.81–1.00 = almost perfect agreement (5).

For formulation of a clinical guideline that could distinguish high-attenuation cysts from tumors, we pooled the data of the two readers in the following conservative worst-case manner. For cysts, we used the lower attenuation value and the more heterogeneous category assigned by either reader. For tumors, we used the higher attenuation value and more homogeneous category assigned by either reader. A visual analysis of the scatterplot, CART analysis, and the following tests were used to ascertain the normality of the tumor attenuation data: Shapiro-Wilk normality test (P < .05 is inconsistent with normality), and coefficients of skewness and kurtosis (P < .05 is inconsistent with normality).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
Cysts
For the 56 high-attenuation renal cysts, the average attenuation was 53.4 HU (range, 23–113 HU) for reader 1, who scored the internal heterogeneity of 55 of 56 (98%) cysts as homogeneous (score = 1) and one (2%) cyst as moderately heterogeneous (score = 3). For reader 2, the average attenuation for the 56 high-attenuation renal cysts was 53.8 HU (range, 21–108 HU); the internal heterogeneity was scored as homogeneous (score = 1) in 53 of 56 (95%) cysts, as mildly heterogeneous (score = 2) in 2 (4%), and as moderately heterogeneous (score = 3) in one (1%).

Carcinomas
For the 54 renal cell carcinomas, the average attenuation was 34.7 HU (range, 21–60 HU) for reader 1, who scored the internal heterogeneity as homogeneous (score = 1) in 35 of 54 (65%) renal cell carcinomas, as mildly heterogeneous (score = 1) in nine (17%), as moderately heterogeneous (score = 2) in four (7%), as markedly heterogeneous (score = 4) in six (11%).

For reader 2, the average attenuation of the 54 renal cell carcinomas was 38.4 (range, 22–60 HU). The internal heterogeneity was scored as homogeneous (score = 1) in 36 of 54 (67%) renal cell carcinomas, mildly heterogeneous (score = 2) in seven (13%), moderately heterogeneous (score = 3) in eight (15%), and markedly heterogeneous (score = 4) in three (5%).

Reader Agreement
There was substantial agreement between the two readers for heterogeneity of the high-attenuation cysts and tumors. For cysts, the readers assigned the same category in 54 of 56 cases; for the remaining two cases, the assigned categories differed by 1 ({kappa} = 0.66). For tumors, the readers agreed on the degree of heterogeneity in 37 of 54 cases and differed by just 1 category value in 15 of the remaining 17 cases ({kappa} = 0.62).

The Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between the readers on the attenuation of both the high-attenuation cysts and the neoplasm. The mean difference for attenuation values between readers for cysts was 0.6 HU for the 56 cysts (< 1 HU; 95% limits of agreement: –12.5 to +13.6 HU); for the 54 tumors, the mean difference was 3.7 HU (95% limits of agreement: –8.9 to +16.2 HU).

Overlap
The data ranges of the high-attenuation cysts and tumors indicated that there was overlap between cysts and tumors with respect to both attenuation and heterogeneity. However, no tumors had attenuation greater than 60 HU, and 16 cysts did. Cysts were also more homogeneous than tumors. Ninety-five percent (53 of 56) of high-attenuation cysts were classified as 1 (uniform) by both readers whereas 56% (30 of 54) of tumors were classified as such.

CART Analysis, Clinical Guideline
Since there was no overlap between the upper part of the range of attenuation between cysts and tumors, the first split suggested by the CART analysis was that if a lesion has an attenuation of 61 HU or greater (light dashed line, Fig 1), regardless of heterogeneity, it should be classified as a high-attenuation cyst. This rule is 100% effective in excluding tumors in our sample data. CART analysis did not yield any subsidiary rules to further distinguish high-attenuation cysts from tumors.


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1: Scatterplot shows attenuation of cysts ({circ}) and tumors ({blacktriangleup}), with worst-case pooling for attenuation and heterogeneity (see text). The light dashed line (at 61 HU, the decision criterion recommended by visual inspection and CART analysis) effectively separates higher attenuation cysts from all tumors in this sample. Given the distribution of tumor attenuation values, a renal mass with attenuation of 70 HU (bold dashed line) or higher at unenhanced CT has a greater than 99.9% chance of representing a high-attenuation renal cyst.

 
To estimate the true distribution of attenuation values for tumors, we applied the Shapiro-Wilk normality test and assessed the skewness and kurtosis of the distribution of attenuation values for tumors. These tests yielded nonsignificant P values (>.1), leading us to conclude that the attenuation values are normally distributed. By using the sample mean and standard deviation and applying the inverse normal distribution function, the 99.9% confidence value (z = 3.09) for absence of tumor is 69.4 HU and the 99.99% confidence value (z = 3.72) is 75.5 HU. (The corresponding values if the mean of the two readers is used instead of the worst-case values, are 64.3 HU and 69.9 HU, respectively.) Restricting the homogeneity to a value of 1 (uniform) can improve the probability of a lesion being a cyst, by excluding about 25% of the tumors in the worst case, while excluding about 5% of the cysts. Based on these considerations, we propose as a clinical guideline that a homogeneous renal mass with an attenuation of 70 HU or higher at unenhanced CT has a greater than 99.9% chance of representing a high-attenuation cyst (Fig 2). The probability of a renal cell carcinoma causing a false-positive result is less than 1 in 1000, based on very conservative assumptions.


Figure 2
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2: High-attenuation left renal mass in a 68-year-old man. Transverse unenhanced CT image demonstrates 1.6 x 1.5 cm high-attenuation mass (arrow) in medial aspect of left kidney. Reader 1 measured the mass at 87 HU and scored it as homogeneous (score = 1). Reader 2 measured the mass as 88 HU and scored it as homogeneous (score = 1). The mass did not enhance with IV contrast material and is a high-attenuation renal cyst.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
Our study suggests that the attenuation of a renal mass and its degree of heterogeneity are useful findings in distinguishing a high-attenuation renal cyst from renal cell carcinoma on unenhanced CT images. This may be of value when a high-attenuation renal mass is incidentally found on an unenhanced CT scan. The knowledge of what the mass more likely represents can be helpful in suggesting how to further evaluate it. For instance, if the mass measures greater than 70 HU and is homogeneous, our results suggest that it would represent a high-attenuation cyst in greater than 99.9% of cases. It can then be argued that if the mass in question were to be further evaluated in a patient predisposed to develop renal cell carcinoma, US would appropriately be the next test, instead of additional CT or MR imaging, which would need to be performed with and without IV contrast material, respectively. In a study by Zirinsky et al (6), 26% (5 of 19) of high-attenuation renal cysts, which measured 42–103 HU, were characterized as benign cysts using US.

Since the study by Zirinsky et al (6) was published, advances in US technology, including color and power Doppler techniques, have proved useful in evaluating renal masses because the vascularity of a mass can be assessed in some cases (7). More recently, compound spatial and tissue harmonic US imaging has been utilized, which can reduce background noise and eliminate unwanted low-level echoes in an otherwise simple renal cyst (8,9). With these technologic advances in US, high-attenuation renal cysts may be characterized as benign with greater frequency than in the past. On the other hand, if the mass measures less than 60 HU and is heterogeneous, our results suggest that there is a higher likelihood that the mass represents a renal cell carcinoma. In this scenario, CT (or MR) performed with and without IV contrast material may be the next appropriate examination, although it is recognized that some of these masses may also be characterized as benign with US.

The Hounsfield unit attenuation of high-attenuation renal cysts can be variable and is dependent on their content. The increased attenuation in these cysts may be secondary to hemorrhage or proteinaceous debris (1,6,1012) and is also dependent on the state of hemorrhage within the cyst. The results of this study are concordant with those of studies that evaluated the CT attenuation of blood. New and Aronow (13) found that clotted blood measures 60–80 HU, while Wolverson et al (14) showed that fresh clot can measure up to 90 HU. However, one high-attenuation cyst in our series measured 113 HU (reader 1). The reason for this discrepancy is unclear, although the variability of attenuation readings may play a role (see below). It should be noted that the attenuation of a high-attenuation cyst is dependent on both the iron and the proteinaceous components of the blood within the cyst, and it has been demonstrated that the protein component accounts for the greater portion of the attenuation value (13). Therefore, the attenuation of the fluid within the cyst may also be dependent on the concentration of blood (hematocrit) or albumin in the patient.

The degree of heterogeneity also plays an important role in evaluating renal masses. In a study by Suh et al (2) in which 37 high-attenuation cysts were evaluated by two readers on portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT images, all were graded as uniform (or mildly heterogeneous) in appearance by the first reader and 97% (36 of 37) were graded as uniform (or mildly heterogeneous) by the second reader. This is concordant with the results of our study, in which 98% (55 of 56) and 95% (53 of 56) (readers 1 and 2, respectively) of high-attenuation renal cysts were rated as homogeneous in attenuation. Although the study by Suh et al (2) evaluated contrast-enhanced images, this should not change the appearance of high-attenuation cysts since they do not enhance with contrast material and should thereby have an identical appearance before and after IV contrast material administration.

It must be emphasized that the use of absolute Hounsfield unit measurements for the characterization of specific tissue may be unjustified. Early in the history of CT, it was recognized that there was a wide range of Hounsfield unit attenuation values for a given tissue as a result of CT scanner performance alone (15). Variability of attenuation was found to be dependent on the type of scanner, position of an object within a scanner, change in peak voltage, and change in scan time. With the introduction of helical scanners, this unreliability was again recognized (16). Therefore, one must be cautious when using absolute Hounsfield units to make a specific diagnosis. Dunnick et al (17) reported a 2-cm homogeneous solid renal cell carcinoma that measured 72 HU on the unenhanced image. The results of our study suggest that this mass would likely represent a high-attenuation cyst. However, given the variability of Hounsfield unit readings, the true attenuation of the mass is not known and the diagnosis of a high-attenuation renal cyst cannot be made with absolute certainty. Therefore, these attributes should not substitute for definitive characterization of a renal mass by using US, CT, or MR imaging. The attenuation and degree of heterogeneity can be used to suggest what a lesion in question more likely represents and what would be the best follow-up test to characterize it.

There were limitations to this study. First, pathologic proof was not available for the high-attenuation renal cysts. However, they were characterized with standard methods used in radiologic practice today (demonstrating no enhancement by comparing unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT images). It should be recognized that location within the kidney and size of the lesion also play a role in the characterization of high-attenuation renal cysts (18), and these factors were not evaluated in our study. Second, high-attenuation renal cysts were only compared with renal cell carcinomas. Angiomyolipomas, which do not contain macroscopic fat, may appear as homogeneous high-attenuation masses at unenhanced CT and may theoretically be confused with a high-attenuation cyst (19). However, in the study by Jinzaki et al (19), these types of angiomyolipomas measured only as high as 51 HU. Also, the masses in our study were evaluated by using different CT scanners and section thickness, which may produce variability in some of the measurements. Finally, a subjective determination of internal heterogeneity of each lesion was used, and interobserver variability in making this determination can exist.

In conclusion, high-attenuation renal cysts and renal cell carcinomas may have a similar appearance on unenhanced CT images. Our study demonstrated that a homogeneous renal mass with an attenuation of 70 HU or higher at unenhanced CT has a greater than 99.9% chance of representing a high-attenuation renal cyst. These findings may be helpful in suggesting the most appropriate next imaging study for definitive characterization.


    ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 


    FOOTNOTES
 

Abbreviations: CART = classification and regression tree analysis • IV = intravenous • ROI = region of interest

Authors stated no financial relationship to disclose.

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, A.I.J., A.N.R., G.M.I.; study concepts/study design or data acquisition or data analysis/interpretation, all authors; manuscript drafting or manuscript revision for important intellectual content, all authors; approval of final version of submitted manuscript, all authors; literature research, P.G.M., G.M.I.; clinical studies, A.I.J., A.N.R., G.M.I.; statistical analysis, P.G.M., G.M.I.; and manuscript editing, all authors


    References
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 

  1. Coleman BG, Arger PH, Mintz MC, Pollack HM, Banner MP. Hyperdense renal masses: a computed tomographic dilemma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:291–294.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Suh M, Coakley FV, Qayyum A, Yeh BM, Breiman RS, Lu Y. Distinction of renal cell carcinomas from high-attenuation renal cysts at portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 2003;228:330–334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 1986;158:1–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307–310.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Zirinsky K, Auh YA, Rubenstein WA, Williams JJ, Rasmanter MW, Kazam E. CT of the hyperdense renal cyst: sonographic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:151–156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hartman DS, Choyke PL, Hartman MS. A practical approach to the cystic renal mass. RadioGraphics 2004;24(Spec Issue):S101–S115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Oktar SO, Yucel S, Ozdemir H, Uluturk A, Isik S. Comparison of conventional sonography, real-time compound sonography, tissue harmonic sonography, and tissue harmonic compound sonography of abdominal and pelvic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1341–1347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Schmidt T, Hohl C, Haage P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging versus fundamental B-mode sonography in the evaluation of focal lesions of the kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1639–1647.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gooding GA. Sonography of hemorrhagic cysts with computed tomographic correlation. J Ultrasound Med 1986;5:699–702.[Abstract]
  11. Fishman MC, Pollack HM, Arger PH, Banner MP. High protein content: another cause of CT hyperdense benign renal cyst. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1983;7:1103–1106.[Medline]
  12. Sussman S, Cochran ST, Pagani JJ, et al. Hyperdense renal masses: a CT manifestation of hemorrhagic renal cysts. Radiology 1984;150:207–211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. New PF, Aronow S. Attenuation measurements of whole blood and blood fractions in computed tomography. Radiology 1976;121(3 pt 1):635–640.[Abstract]
  14. Wolverson MK, Crepps LF, Sundaram M, Heiberg E, Vas WG, Shields JB. Hyperdensity of recent hemorrhage at body computed tomography: incidence and morphologic variation. Radiology 1983;148:779–784.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Levi C, Gray JE, McCullough EX, Hattery RR. The unreliability of CT numbers as absolute vales. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982;139:443–447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Bosniak MA, Rofsky NM. Problems in the detection and characterization of small renal masses. Radiology 1996;198:638–641.[Free Full Text]
  17. Dunnick NR, Korobkin M, Clark WM. CT demonstration of hyperdense renal carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984;8:1023–1024.[Medline]
  18. Israel GM, Bosniak MA. Follow-up CT of moderately complex cystic lesions of the kidney (Bosniak category IIF). AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:627–633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Jinzaki M, Tanimoto A, Narimatsu Y, et al. Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat. Radiology 1997;205:497–502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Silverman, G. M. Israel, B. R. Herts, and J. P. Richie
Management of the Incidental Renal Mass
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 16 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
H. Siddiki, J. G. Fletcher, B. McFarland, N. Dajani, N. Orme, B. Koenig, M. Strobel, and S. M. Wolf
Incidental Findings in CT Colonography: Literature Review and Survey of Current Research Practice.
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2008; 36(2): 320 - 331.
[PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jonisch, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jonisch, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE