Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2432051714
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stahl, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, S. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stahl, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, S. O.
(Radiology 2007;243:483-492.)
© RSNA, 2007


Neuroradiology

White Matter Damage in Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Assessment with Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging and Parallel Imaging Techniques1

Robert Stahl, MD, Olaf Dietrich, PhD, Stefan J. Teipel, MD, Harald Hampel, PhD, Maximilian F. Reiser, PhD, and Stefan O. Schoenberg, PhD

1 From the Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospitals–Grosshadern (R.S., O.D., M.F.R., S.O.S.); and Department of Psychiatry (S.J.T., H.H.), Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany. From the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received October 20, 2005; revision requested December 15; revision received June 8, 2006; accepted July 7; final version accepted September 1. Address correspondence to R.S. (e-mail: Robert.Stahl{at}med.uni-muenchen.de).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCE IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
Purpose: To prospectively determine regional differences in fiber tract integrity between elderly patients with Alzheimer disease (AD), those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy elderly subjects by using diffusion-tensor imaging with parallel imaging techniques and a new eight-element receiving coil.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Fifteen patients with AD (seven men, eight women; mean age; 68.8 years), 16 patients with MCI (nine men, seven women; mean age, 68.9 years) and 19 healthy control subjects (eight men, 11 women; mean age, 63.9 years) underwent diffusion-tensor imaging performed with a 1.5-T magnetic resonance system. An echo-planar imaging diffusion sequence was used with an integrated parallel acquisition technique (PAT) and an eight-element head coil. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), and relative anisotropy (RA) values of several white matter (WM) regions were determined. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used initially to test for overall equality of median values in each data group. Single posttest comparisons were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test, with an overall statistical significance level of .05.

Results: FA and RA values were significantly (P < .05) decreased, whereas ADC values in the splenium of the corpus callosum were higher in patients with AD than in patients with MCI. Evidence of higher ADC values in the WM of the temporal lobe was observed in patients with AD compared with the ADC values in patients with MCI and in control subjects. ADC values in the parietal WM were significantly (P < .05) elevated in patients with MCI compared with those in control subjects. The images obtained with integrated PAT showed fewer susceptibility artifacts and were less distorted than images acquired without parallel imaging techniques.

Conclusion: Reduced FA and RA values in patients with AD suggest that diffusion-tensor imaging of the brain can be used to confirm clinical manifestation of AD but is less applicable in the detection of MCI.

© RSNA, 2007


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCE IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
Loss of layer III and layer V large pyramidal neurons in cortical association areas has been described as the pathologic substrate of the progressive cortical disconnection syndrome in Alzheimer disease (AD) (1,2). Cortical neuron loss results in regional gray matter atrophy that can be measured in vivo with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (3). However, in AD, neuronal degeneration follows a sequence that starts in the neuronal periphery with (a) loss of synaptic functional and structural integrity, (b) redistribution of cell organelles and elements of the cytoskeleton from axons and dendrites to the neuronal soma, (c) axonal and dendritic degeneration, and (d) loss of the entire neuron, with insoluble neurofibrillary tangles replacing the neuronal soma (ghost tangles) (4). Consistently, postmortem studies reveal changes in both gray matter and white matter (WM) in patients with AD (5). Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is regarded as a predementia stage of AD (68) and may show very early effects of AD-type disease in the cerebral WM.

Anisotropy of water diffusion yields important information about fiber tract systems. The diffusion of water molecules is more restricted in directions perpendicular rather than parallel to the longitudinal axis of the fibers, resulting in high diffusion anisotropy in the WM.

Diffusion-tensor imaging is a further development of diffusion-weighted imaging. Whereas an averaged apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is calculated with diffusion-weighted imaging, the effective diffusion tensor in diffusion-tensor imaging allows computation of principal diffusivity and diffusion anisotropy. In several disease processes the cellular integrity of nerve fibers is reduced or destroyed, resulting in less constrained motion of the water molecules and leading to higher ADC values and lower anisotropy values. Thus, the role of diffusion-tensor imaging in the evaluation of WM damage is currently being established, and diffusion-tensor imaging has been successfully applied in the early diagnosis of several neurologic diseases (9). Following the hypothesized spread of neurologic disease from the neuronal periphery to the neuronal soma in AD, diffusion-tensor imaging might be able to depict neurofibrillary degeneration in patients with early stages of AD (1012).

A major disadvantage of the single-shot echo-planar imaging procedures typically used with diffusion-tensor imaging are the substantial susceptibility artifacts that result from the long echo times (>50 msec). These artifacts arise particularly in the skull base region (especially the frontal base) and negatively affect the image quality and accuracy of further postprocessing steps, such as calculation of ADC maps or fiber tracking (13). These single-shot sequences enable the echo time to be shortened by reducing the number of phase-encoding steps; however, this leads to a reduction in spatial resolution. Parallel imaging is a relatively new procedure that permits the number of phase-encoding steps to be reduced, and thus leads to shorter echo times without loss of spatial resolution. However, special receiving coils are necessary to simultaneously record the MR signal with several different spatially arranged coil elements.

The aim of our study was to prospectively determine regional differences in fiber tract integrity between elderly patients with AD, those with MCI, and healthy elderly subjects by using diffusion-tensor imaging with parallel imaging techniques and a new eight-element receiving coil.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCE IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
Participants
There were three weekends during the period from December 2002 through March 2005 when the MR imager was available for diffusion-tensor brain imaging with the new eight-element head coil.

We examined 15 patients with AD (seven men, eight women; age range, 45–82 years; mean age, 68.8 years ± 10.8 [standard deviation]) and 16 patients with MCI (nine men, seven women; age range, 52–84 years; mean age, 68.9 years ± 9.3). Patients with AD fulfilled the clinical criteria for clinically probable AD set forth by the National Institute of Neurologic and Communicative Disorders (14). Subjects with MCI fulfilled the criteria set forth by Petersen et al (15,16) (ie, subjective memory complaints, delayed verbal recall at least 1.5 standard deviations below the respective age standard, normal general cognitive function, and capability to perform normal activities of daily living). Dementia severity was assessed with the Minimal Mental State Examination (MMSE) (17). The MMSE scores of patients with AD ranged from 15 to 29, with a median score of 25 (25th percentile, 17; 75th percentile, 25); the MMSE scores of patients with MCI ranged from 23 to 29, with a median score of 27 (25th percentile, 25; 75th percentile, 28).

In addition, 19 healthy control subjects were examined (eight men, 11 women; age range, 37–78 years; mean age, 63.9 years ± 10.3). Control subjects did not have subjective cognitive impairment: Their MMSE scores ranged from 27 to 30, with a median score of 30 (25th percentile, 28; 75th percentile, 30). All subject scores were within 1 standard deviation of the age-adjusted mean value in all subtests of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease cognitive battery (18).

The MMSE score of patients with AD was significantly lower than that of patients with MCI (Mann-Whitney U test, P < .005) and control subjects (Mann-Whitney U test, P < .001). The MMSE score of patients with MCI was significantly lower than that of control subjects (Mann-Whitney U test, P < .001). Mean age did not differ significantly (analysis of variance, P = .637) between the examined groups. The sex distribution did not differ between groups.

Subjects were recruited from the Department of Psychiatry, Alzheimer Memorial Center, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Germany. Medical comorbidity in patients and control subjects was excluded by means of history taking, physical and neurologic examinations, psychiatric evaluation, chest radiography, electrocardiography, electroencephalography, brain MR imaging, and laboratory tests (complete blood count; assessment of sedimentation rate; evaluation of levels of serum B12 and folate, electrolytes, glucose, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, liver-associated enzymes, cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and antinuclear antibodies; rheumatoid factor analysis; Venereal Disease Research Laboratories test; human immunodeficiency virus screening; thyroid function tests; and urine analysis). Participants were included in our study only after they provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the institutional review board.

MR Imaging and Preliminary Testing
The basic principle of parallel imaging is that image acquisition can be accelerated by decreasing the number of phase-encoding steps without reducing the spatial resolution of the image. For these methods, the simultaneous acquisition of data with two or more receiving coils that have different spatial sensitivities is fundamental.

We performed MR imaging of the brain with a 1.5-T MR imager (Magnetom Sonata Maestro Class; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). We used an eight-element phased-array head coil and integrated hardware and software solutions (iPAT; Siemens Medical Solutions) for the parallel acquisition technique (PAT).

The following sequences were used: For acquisition of structural data, a high-spatial-resolution T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapidly acquired gradient-echo sequence was applied. This was a three-dimensional inversion-recovery gradient-echo sequence with a spatial resolution of 1.1 x 1.1 x 1.1 mm and a repetition time msec/echo time msec/inversion time msec of 1570/3.9/800. A total of 160 sagittal sections were acquired with a 256 x 256 matrix and a 270 x 270-mm field of view. The examination lasted 6 minutes 42 seconds. To identify WM lesions, 36 T2-weighted transverse sections were acquired by using a conventional fast spin-echo sequence (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 7450/93) with a 256 x 208 matrix and a 230 x 187-mm field of view, which resulted in a voxel size of 0.9 x 0.9 x 3.6 mm.

Diffusion-weighted data were collected with a spin-echo single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence (6000/71). Diffusion gradients were applied in six spatial directions, as described by Basser and Pierpaoli (19). The b values used were 0 sec/mm2 and 1000 sec/mm2. Images were acquired with a 128 x 128 matrix and a 230 x 230-mm field of view. The resulting voxel size was 1.8 x 1.8 x 3.6 mm. Thirty-six transverse sections were acquired. Ten measurements were obtained and averaged. The examination time was 7 minutes 44 seconds. During each course of imaging, each subject was examined in the same position in the imager.

Previous measurements were obtained in a phantom and in vivo to compare the quality of images obtained with the eight-element head coil with the quality of images obtained with a conventional quadrature head coil, which had a slightly larger inside diameter (head coil diameter, 24 cm vs 26 cm). For phantom measurements, a cylindrically shaped 120-mm-diameter water phantom (Siemens Medical Solutions) was placed in each head coil. The spin-echo diffusion-tensor echo-planar imaging sequence was applied without integrated PAT in both coils and with integrated PAT in the eight-element head coil by using a b value of 1000 sec/mm2 and diffusion weighting in the section direction. Diffusion-weighted imaging parallel to the section gradient axis increased the echo time to 101 msec with integrated PAT and to 144 msec without integrated PAT. These measurements were obtained 20 times to enable calculation of image noise from the subtraction image of two subsequent acquisitions. Two regions of interest (ROIs), one in a central position (size, 35 pixels) and the other in a peripheral position (size, 130 pixels) with respect to the coil, were selected within the phantom and the brain by a radiologist (R.S.). Ten signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements were calculated as the ratio of the mean signal intensity of two subsequent repetitions and the variance of the signal intensity in the difference image (scaled with a factor of 1/{surd}2) (20).

To receive an impression of the image distortions, six healthy control subjects were examined with the eight-element head coil by using the spin-echo diffusion-tensor echo-planar imaging sequence with and without integrated PAT. A radiologist (S.O.S.) with 8 years of experience with head MR imaging compared these images with those obtained with the T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapidly acquired gradient-echo sequence described previously.

The MR imaging unit supported the use of modified sensitivity encoding (21) and generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) (22) reconstruction algorithms. Test measurements were obtained in healthy control subjects to assess image quality, SNR, and imaging artifacts for the modified sensitivity encoding and GRAPPA algorithms. The GRAPPA algorithm revealed fewer ghosting artifacts (N/2-ghost) and a better SNR, which resulted in a better image quality. With use of an acceleration factor of three, considerable ghosting artifacts degraded the image quality. Thus, for all of the remaining examinations, we used an acceleration factor of two with the GRAPPA reconstruction algorithm.

Postprocessing and Image Analysis
The ADC (D) represents the mean diffusivity and is the mean value of the three eigenvalues, as shown in Equation (1):

Formula
.

The following anisotropy indexes could be developed from the full diffusion tensor and are invariant to the head position of the examined subjects. Relative anisotropy (RA) is the ratio of the standard deviation of the eigenvalues to their mean value. The values range between 0 (isotropy) and {surd}2 (complete anisotropy), as shown in Equation (2):

Formula
.

Fractional anisotropy (FA) can be interpreted as the fraction of the magnitude of the diffusion tensor that can be ascribed to anisotropic diffusion. The values range between 0 (isotropy) and 1 (complete anisotropy), as shown in Equation (3):

Formula
.

From the diffusion-weighted sequence, the ADC, FA, and RA values in each voxel were calculated with software developed in house with Interactive Data Language (version 5.4; Research Systems, Boulder, Colo). The resulting maps and the diffusion-tensor echo-planar T2-weighted images (those obtained with the diffusion-tensor echo-planar sequence and a b value of 0 sec/mm2), the magnetization-prepared rapidly acquired gradient-echo images, and the conventional T2-weighted images were converted separately into three-dimensional data sets.

The ADC, FA, and RA values were examined in different WM areas. First, a radiologist (S.O.S.) who was blinded to the clinical diagnosis identified WM lesions on all images to guarantee that these areas were not included in the evaluation. Subjects had no more than three subcortical WM hyperintense areas, and none of the areas exceeded 10 mm in diameter.

Thereafter, an observer (R.S., 4 years of experience in brain MR image interpretation) carefully placed several ROIs (12–30 pixels, the number of pixels depended on the anatomic region) bilaterally directly in the WM (Fig 1) on T2-weighted diffusion-tensor echo-planar images (those with a b value of 0 sec/mm2) in agreement with previous studies (11). The correct ROI position was confirmed by means of simultaneous visual comparison with the corresponding layers of the magnetization-prepared rapidly acquired gradient-echo and conventional T2-weighted data sets (a) at the genu and splenium of the corpus callosum in three consecutive sections on which these structures were completely shown; (b) laterally in the pericallosal WM; (c) in two consecutive sections at the genu of the corpus callosum and the posterior limb of the internal capsule, located between the head of the caudate nucleus and the pallidum, as well as between the pallidum and the thalamus; (d) in the WM of the frontal lobes on three consecutive sections starting at the most cranial section where at least one lateral ventricle was completely contained; (e) in the parietal lobe posterior to the central sulcus on the most caudal section where it could be identified and on the contiguous section above this section; (f) in the temporal lobe posterolateral to the lateral fissure, beginning at the most caudal section where it could be identified and continuing to the two contiguous sections above this section; and (g) in the occipital lobe within the optic radiations in two consecutive sections, beginning at the most caudal section where the occipital horn of the lateral ventricle was fully contained. These ROIs were transferred to the ADC, FA, and RA data sets of each subject, and the appropriate mean values of each ROI were calculated.


Figure 1
View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1: Transverse (1570/3.9/800) MR images show ROIs (white areas) at which ADC, FA, and RA values were determined in the, A, parietal lobe, B, frontal lobe, C, corpus callosum and pericallosal areas, D, internal capsule, E, occipital lobe, and, F, temporal lobe.

 
Statistical Analysis
Data were initially assessed for normality with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. On the basis of these results, we decided to use nonparametric procedures to compare diffusion-tensor imaging–derived data and MMSE scores among the three groups of participants. The Kruskal-Wallis test was initially used to test for overall equality of medians in each data group. When statistically significant differences occurred, single posttest comparisons were performed by using the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Differences in age between the groups and in SNR between different coil settings were tested with one-way analysis of variance and Scheffé post hoc comparisons. The extent of distortion artifacts between integrated PAT and nonintegrated PAT technology was assessed with a two-tailed Student t test for paired samples. Correlations between diffusion-tensor imaging parameters and the age and MMSE score of subjects were examined with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. All evaluations were performed with the SPSS statistical package (version 12; SPSS, Chicago, Ill). A level of significance of P < .05 for comparative measurements was used throughout the study.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCE IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
Image Quality and Artifacts
Images of the phantom acquired with the eight-element coil but without integrated PAT showed a significant (P < .001) average increase of 35% in mean SNR compared with images acquired with the conventional head coil (23.2 vs 18.6 in central regions, 23.2 vs 16.0 in peripheral regions) (Table 1). The SNR of images acquired with integrated PAT was lower than that of images acquired without integrated PAT but higher than the expected reduction of 1/{surd}2, particularly in the peripherally positioned ROIs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Comparison of Mean SNRs in 10 Sequential Measurements

 
For in vivo imaging, comparison of the coils revealed a slight SNR decrease in the center of the brain; however, SNR was significantly increased by 62% (16.9 vs 9.7) (Table 1) in a peripheral region of the brain. In both cases, measurements obtained with the eight-element head coil and integrated PAT resulted in an improved average SNR of 13% compared with measurements obtained with the eight-element head coil but without integrated PAT (17.5 vs 14.7 in central regions, 16.9 vs 15.7 in peripheral regions) (Table 1). This improvement was significant in central regions of the brain.

Comparison of data obtained with and without integrated PAT in six control subjects revealed there were fewer distortion artifacts on images obtained with integrated PAT, particularly in the area of the eyeballs and the frontal base. For example, the right eyeball appeared circular with the magnetization-prepared rapidly acquired gradient-echo sequence (which served as the reference standard); however, it was distorted and took on an elliptical shape when echo-planar imaging sequences were used (Fig 2). The ratio of the major and minor axes of this ellipse served as an indicator of the extent of distortion. Without integrated PAT, the average ratio was 1.54 ± 0.15 (standard deviation), whereas use of integrated PAT yielded an average ratio of 1.24 ± 0.08 and resulted in a significant improvement of 19% (paired t test, P < .001). At the frontal base (at the level of the frontal sinus), the semicircular frontal parts of the brain appeared to be displaced backward and the frontal dural edge was irregularly impressed when echo-planar sequences were used (Fig 2). The sagittal distance between the rostral and posterior brain frontiers at a right paramedian line obtained with the magnetization-prepared rapidly acquired gradient-echo sequence was used as the reference standard, with an arbitrarily defined length of 1. This average distance amounted to 0.93 ± 0.03 without integrated PAT and to 0.97 ± 0.02 with integrated PAT. The use of integrated PAT resulted in a significant improvement of 4% (paired t test, P < .005).


Figure 2
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2: Transverse MR images obtained with the diffusion-tensor echo-planar sequence (6000/71; b value, 0 sec/mm2). A, B, Images obtained at the level of the frontal sinus with the eight-element coil in a healthy control subject. The semicircular frontal parts of the brain appear to be displaced backward, and the frontal dural edge is irregularly impressed with use of the echo-planar imaging sequence (arrows), resulting in a reduced distance between the rostral and posterior brain frontiers measured at a right paramedian line (orange line). C, D, Images obtained at the level of the eyeballs with the eight-element coil in a healthy control subject. The primarily circular eyeballs are distorted and take on an elliptical shape with use of the echo-planar imaging sequence (diameter indicated by orange lines). Fewer distortion artifacts occur with sequences performed with integrated PAT (B, D) than with sequences performed without integrated PAT (A, C).

 
Diffusion-Tensor Examination
Intergroup comparison indicated that patients with AD had higher ADC values in the splenium of the corpus callosum than did patients with MCI and higher values in the temporal lobe than did patients with MCI and healthy control subjects (Table 2). However, these findings were not significant when assessed with post hoc comparisons. Patients with AD exhibited significantly (P < .05) lower FA and RA values in the splenium of the corpus callosum than did patients with MCI (Tables 3, 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. ADC Values in Selected WM Regions

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. FA Values in Selected WM Regions

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. RA Values in Selected WM Regions

 
Patients with MCI had significantly (P < .05) higher ADC values in the parietal lobe than did healthy control subjects. Considering the overall voxel intensity of all segmented WM ROIs, the anisotropy indexes (FA and RA) in patients with AD were significantly (P < .05) lower than those in control subjects. No significant intergroup differences were observed within the remaining regions.

No significant correlation between age (AD group, P > .123; MCI group, P > .155; control group, P > .214) or MMSE score (AD group, P > .104; MCI group, P > .215; control group, P > .106) and the diffusion and anisotropy parameters was observed in any group.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCE IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 
Parallel Imaging Technique
Diffusion-tensor imaging with parallel imaging yielded images with fewer susceptibility artifacts. In our study, geometric distortions were reduced by 4% at the frontal base and by 19% at the eyeballs. These reductions were due to shorter echo times and were in agreement with the literature (23). Because of the shortened echo train length, late echoes with relatively low signal due to T2* decay were not acquired. Therefore, the loss of SNR, which is inherent in integrated PAT, was partially balanced depending on the transverse relaxation times. In the water phantom with a relatively long T2, the SNR obtained with integrated PAT was decreased by less than the expected factor of {surd}2 compared with the SNR obtained with nonintegrated PAT. However, measurements obtained in vivo show an increase in SNR that can be explained by the shorter T2 in combination with the reduced echo time. (Echo time was reduced from 144 msec without integrated PAT to 101 msec with integrated PAT.) Additionally, use of the eight-element head coil yielded an improved SNR in comparison with the SNR yielded by the conventional quadrature head coil, at least in eccentrically positioned regions, because of the better sensitivity of surface coil elements in the short range. This effect was enhanced by the smaller inside diameter of the eight-element head coil, resulting in a better filling factor.

In our study, the ranges of ADC and anisotropy values in patients and control subjects were comparable with values reported by other authors. For example, Basser and Pierpaoli (19) and Kantarci et al (24) obtained values that ranged from (0.692 to 0.915) x 10–3 mm2/sec in the WM of healthy subjects. In our study, control subjects had ADC values between (0.724 and 0.828) x 10–3 mm2/sec. Thus, we concluded that our results, which we obtained with integrated PAT technology, were realistic and that our method was valid.

Diffusion-Tensor Imaging in Patients with AD and in Those with MCI
AD can be regarded as a cortical disconnection syndrome that affects not only the cortical neuronal soma but also the axons and dendrites in the cerebral WM. According to this model, a pattern of WM disease that encompassed the temporal-parietal-frontal association cortex was found with diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion-tensor imaging in several studies (Table 5). However, different mechanisms beyond primary fiber degeneration contribute to WM changes in patients with AD. First, Wallerian degeneration leads to secondary neurofibrillary degeneration. Second, vascular or ischemic alterations cause axonal damage and gliosis, which lead to WM rarefaction (25). In addition, myelin breakdown—especially in late-myelinating association areas—has been suggested (26,27). In diffusion-tensor imaging, elevated ADC values are related to neurodegeneration, whereas decreased FA values indicate disturbed WM homogeneity.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Summarized Main Findings Concerning Diffusion-Tensor Imaging and Diffusion-weighted Imaging Measurements in Patients with AD and Those with MCI

 
In our study, the patients with AD showed evidence of elevated ADC values in the temporal lobe compared with the ADC values in the control subjects and the patients with MCI; this indicates progressive secondary anterograde Wallerian degeneration in the temporal-extratemporal conduit of the WM tracts. Reduced FA and RA values combined with an indication of elevated ADC values occurred in the splenium of the corpus callosum in patients with AD compared with FA and RA values in the splenium of the corpus callosum in patients with MCI. This suggests that WM inhomogeneity in this area (which contains corticocortical axons) occurs in a later stage of the disease and has either a vascular or an ischemic origin or is caused by myelin breakdown. A reason that this effect appears in only this area might be that fibers in the brain are most highly organized in the midline and adjacent areas of the corpus callosum. Crossing fibers can dramatically change the anisotropy values at the spatial resolution of diffusion-tensor imaging so that the effects might be more easily detectable at this location, with few or no crossing fibers. However, between patients with AD and control subjects we found reduced FA and RA values only if we combined all examined WM ROIs into one large ROI. This indicated that only minimal measurable WM inhomogeneity in the affected association cortex existed in our population.

Our findings contradict some findings reported in the literature (Table 5). This contradiction might be due to methodologic issues: Some authors (24,2830) used only diffusion-weighted imaging, which, when compared with DTI (11,12,31,32), does not develop a full tensor; therefore, data obtained in these studies were susceptible to different head positions of the examined subjects. The parallel imaging technique was not used in any of these studies. The heterogeneity of the examined subjects may also play a role: Bozzali et al (11) reported significantly increased ADC values, reduced FA values, or both in pericallosal areas and frontal and parietal lobes, whereas we found no significant differences in these values between patients with AD and control subjects. This might partly be explained by the fact that MMSE scores of patients in our study were slightly higher than MMSE scores of patients in the Bozzali et al study. This disparity indicated that patients in our study exhibited a somewhat milder form of AD than did patients in the Bozzali et al study. Also, Bozalli et al reported FA values that were only about half of the values obtained in our study. A reason for this disparity might be that Bozalli et al examined large ROIs; thus, the FA values may apply to not only WM but also cerebrospinal fluid.

In regard to patients with MCI, we observed only elevated ADC values in the parietal WM and no differences in the anisotropy indexes compared with measurements in the control subjects. Since structural imaging studies have revealed temporal and particularly hippocampal atrophy in patients with early AD (33), we expected at least some difference in this area. In agreement with our findings, Fellgiebel et al (12) demonstrated FA values in patients with MCI that did not differ from those in control subjects. In the study of Fellgiebel et al, FA values had a comparable order of magnitude as in our study, and the patients with MCI had a mean MMSE score and mean age similar to those of our patient group. In contrast to our findings, Fellgiebel et al observed elevated ADC values in the temporal WM. In a conventional diffusion-weighted imaging study involving patients with MCI, Kantarci et al (24) observed reduced anisotropy values only in the occipital WM, whereas no differences occurred in frontal, parietal, temporal, or anterior WM.

Study Limitations
The variability of our findings in comparison with previous results may be caused by other factors, such as the number of participants and the stage of disease, the differential size and placement of ROIs across studies, and the fact that changes in diffusion and anisotropy indexes do not necessarily reflect WM damage but could also be a result of partial volume effects in atrophic brains. However, to avoid this last point, we used a manual approach in the present study to place ROIs on individual images. We took care to place ROIs consistently in only WM areas to avoid partial volume effects through cerebrospinal fluid spaces. This is also the reason we used relatively small ROIs. In addition, in the studies performed with diffusion-weighted imaging, a position-invariant tensor also was not developed; thus, their results are influenced by different head positions of the examined subjects.

Diffusion-tensor imaging with integrated PAT yields images with fewer distortions because the echo time is shorter; however, more reconstruction artifacts occurred. In addition, in comparison with a conventional head coil, the new eight-element head coil leads to an improved SNR so that better quality of measured data can be assumed.

In conclusion, we found reduced FA and RA values only in patients with AD, whereas patients with MCI had only elevated ADC values in the parietal WM in comparison with control subjects; therefore, we conclude that diffusion-tensor imaging of the brain is less applicable for early detection of AD-related abnormal changes in patients with MCI than for confirmation of clinical manifestations of AD. As a result of heterogeneous findings in the literature, possible correlations between diffusion-tensor imaging data and clinical parameters should be examined in further studies.


    ADVANCE IN KNOWLEDGE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCE IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Berthold Kiefer and Rolf Sauter from Siemens Medical Solutions and Felician Jancu from the psychiatric hospital of Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich for technical support.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer disease • ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient • FA = fractional anisotropy • MCI = mild cognitive impairment • MMSE = Minimal Mental State Examination • PAT = parallel acquisition technique • RA = relative anisotropy • ROI = region of interest • SNR = signal-to-noise ratio • WM = white matter

Authors stated no financial relationship to disclose.

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, O.D., S.J.T., M.F.R., S.O.S.; study concepts/study design or data acquisition or data analysis/interpretation, all authors; manuscript drafting or manuscript revision for important intellectual content, all authors; manuscript final version approval, all authors; literature research, R.S., O.D., S.J.T., S.O.S.; clinical studies, R.S., O.D., S.J.T.; experimental studies, R.S., O.D.; statistical analysis, R.S.; and manuscript editing, all authors


    References
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ADVANCE IN KNOWLEDGE
 References
 

  1. Delbeuck X, Van der Linden M, Collette F. Alzheimer's disease as a disconnection syndrome? Neuropsychol Rev 2003;13:79–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Fox NC, Scahill RI, Crum WR, Rossor MN. Correlation between rates of brain atrophy and cognitive decline in AD. Neurology 1999;52:1687–1689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Smith AD. Imaging the progression of Alzheimer pathology through the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:4135–4137.[Free Full Text]
  4. Brun A, Englund E. A white matter disorder in dementia of the Alzheimer type: a pathoanatomical study. Ann Neurol 1986;19:253–262.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Braak E, Griffing K, Arai K, Bohl J, Bratzke H, Braak H. Neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease: what is new since A Alzheimer? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1999;249:14–22.
  6. Collie A, Maruff P. The neuropsychology of preclinical Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2000;24:365–374.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Larrieu S, Letenneur L, Orgogozo JM, et al. Incidence and outcome of mild cognitive impairment in a population-based prospective cohort. Neurology 2002;59:1594–1599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wolf H, Grunwald M, Ecke GM, et al. The prognosis of mild cognitive impairment in the elderly. J Neural Transm Suppl 1998;54:31–50.[Medline]
  9. Taylor WD, Hsu E, Krishnan KR, MacFall JR. Diffusion tensor imaging: background, potential, and utility in psychiatric research. Biol Psychiatry 2004;55:201–207.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Rose SE, Chen F, Chalk JB, et al. Loss of connectivity in Alzheimer's disease: an evaluation of white matter tract integrity with colour coded MR diffusion tensor imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:528–530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Bozzali M, Falini A, Franceschi M, et al. White matter damage in Alzheimer's disease assessed in vivo using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:742–746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Fellgiebel A, Wille P, Muller MJ, et al. Ultrastructural hippocampal and white matter alterations in mild cognitive impairment: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;18:101–108.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Le Bihan D, Mangin JF, Poupon C, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:534–546.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 1984;34:939–944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, et al. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1985–1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 1999;56:303–308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state:" a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Morris JC, Heyman A, Mohs RC, et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1989;39:1159–1165.
  19. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. A simplified method to measure the diffusion tensor from seven MR images. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:928–934.[Medline]
  20. Firbank MJ, Coulthard A, Harrison RM, Williams ED. A comparison of two methods for measuring the signal to noise ratio on MR images. Phys Med Biol 1999;44(suppl 12):N261–N264.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952–962.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202–1210.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Chen Q, et al. Resolution enhancement in single-shot imaging using simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH). Magn Reson Med 1999;41:1236–1245.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Kantarci K, Jack CR Jr, Xu YC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: regional diffusivity of water. Radiology 2001;219:101–107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Englund E. Neuropathology of white matter changes in Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1998;9:6–12.[Medline]
  26. Bartzokis G. Age-related myelin breakdown: a developmental model of cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 2004;25:5–18.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Bartzokis G, Sultzer D, Lu PH, Nuechterlein KH, Mintz J, Cummings JL. Heterogeneous age-related breakdown of white matter structural integrity: implications for cortical "disconnection" in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 2004;25:843–851.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Bozzao A, Floris R, Baviera ME, Apruzzese A, Simonetti G. Diffusion and perfusion MR imaging in cases of Alzheimer's disease: correlations with cortical atrophy and lesion load. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1030–1036.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Hanyu H, Asano T, Sakurai H, et al. Diffusion-weighted and magnetization transfer imaging of the corpus callosum in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Sci 1999;167:37–44.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Hanyu H, Sakurai H, Iwamoto T, Takasaki M, Shindo H, Abe K. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the hippocampus and temporal white matter in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Sci 1998;156:195–200.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Takahashi S, Yonezawa H, Takahashi J, Kudo M, Inoue T, Tohgi H. Selective reduction of diffusion anisotropy in white matter of Alzheimer disease brains measured by 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Lett 2002;332:45–48.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Yoshiura T, Mihara F, Ogomori K, Tanaka A, Kaneko K, Masuda K. Diffusion tensor in posterior cingulate gyrus: correlation with cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroreport 2002;13:2299–2302.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. de Leon MJ, Convit A, DeSanti S, et al. Contribution of structural neuroimaging to the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Int Psychogeriatr 1997;9:183–190.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T.-J. Hsieh, H.-Y. Chuang, Y.-C. Chen, C.-L. Wang, S.-H. Lan, G.-C. Liu, C.-K. Ho, and W.-C. Lin
Subclinical White Matter Integrity in Subjects with Cumulative Lead Exposure
Radiology, June 22, 2009; (2009) 2522080653.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T.-J. Hsieh, J.-M. Chang, H.-Y. Chuang, C.-H. Ko, M.-L. Hsieh, G.-C. Liu, and J.-S. Hsu
End-Stage Renal Disease: In Vivo Diffusion-Tensor Imaging of Silent White Matter Damage
Radiology, June 15, 2009; (2009) 2523080484.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BrainHome page
Y. Zhang, N. Schuff, A.-T. Du, H. J. Rosen, J. H. Kramer, M. L. Gorno-Tempini, B. L. Miller, and M. W. Weiner
White matter damage in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease measured by diffusion MRI
Brain, May 12, 2009; (2009) awp071v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. Wang, F.C. Goldstein, E. Veledar, A.I. Levey, J.J. Lah, C.C. Meltzer, C.A. Holder, and H. Mao
Alterations in Cortical Thickness and White Matter Integrity in Mild Cognitive Impairment Measured by Whole-Brain Cortical Thickness Mapping and Diffusion Tensor Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2009; 30(5): 893 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. T. Fodero-Tavoletti, C. C. Rowe, C. A. McLean, L. Leone, Q.-X. Li, C. L. Masters, R. Cappai, and V. L. Villemagne
Characterization of PiB Binding to White Matter in Alzheimer Disease and Other Dementias
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 198 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
C. T. Kodl, D. T. Franc, J. P. Rao, F. S. Anderson, W. Thomas, B. A. Mueller, K. O. Lim, and E. R. Seaquist
Diffusion Tensor Imaging Identifies Deficits in White Matter Microstructure in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes That Correlate With Reduced Neurocognitive Function
Diabetes, November 1, 2008; 57(11): 3083 - 3089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. VanRollins, R. L. Woltjer, H. Yin, J. D. Morrow, and T. J. Montine
F2-Dihomo-isoprostanes arise from free radical attack on adrenic acid
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 995 - 1005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stahl, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, S. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stahl, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, S. O.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE