Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
(Radiology. 2001;218:920.)
© RSNA, 2001

Errata

Erratum

"Patient Radiation Dose Associated with Uterine Artery Embolization." Radiology 2000; 214:121–125.

On page 123, in the first column, the first sentence (which begins at the bottom of page 122) should read as follows:

The number of women of childbearing age in the country Nx, according to official data from the 1990 consensus counts, was approximately 58.54 million, and the average number of children of all women of childbearing age Px was estimated to be 1.22.

On page 123, in the Table, fourth column, last row, the correct mean estimated ovarian dose for the 20 patients plus or minus the SD is 22.34 ± 17.11.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE