HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content

"Occult Scaphoid Fractures: Comparison of Multidetector CT and MR Imaging—Initial Experience." Radiology 2006;240(1):169–176

Page 169, Abstract, the third sentence in the Results should read as follows: MR imaging depicted all 11 fractures but only three cortical fractures.

Page 171, table 1, the third column, seventh row cell should be Cortical.

Page 174, column one, the two sentences beginning at line 10 should read as follows: In three patients, a cortical fracture line could be identified on T1-weighted spin-echo images (Fig 2). In five patients with proved cortical involvement on follow-up radiographs, no cortical fracture line could be seen on images obtained with any of the sequences (Fig 3), which resulted in a sensitivity of 38% (95% CI: 16.0%, 65.0%), a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 52%, 100%), and an accuracy of 55% (95% CI: 24%, 85%) for the detection of cortical involvement in occult scaphoid fractures (Table 3).

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content