Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 30, 2001, 10.1148/radiol.2213001746

(Radiology 2001;221:802.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2213001746v1
221/3/802    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirai, T.
Right arrow Articles by Uemura, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hirai, T.
Right arrow Articles by Uemura, S.
© RSNA, 2001

Head and Neck Imaging

Maximum Stenosis of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery: Effect of Luminal Morphology on Stenosis Measurement by Using CT Angiography and Conventional DSA1

Toshinori Hirai, MD, Yukunori Korogi, MD, Ken Ono, MD, Yuka Murata, MD, Mutsumasa Takahashi, MD, Kenji Suginohara, MD and Shozaburo Uemura, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (T.H., K.O., Y.M.) and Neurosurgery (K.S., S.U.), Amakusa Medical Center, 854-1 Kameba, Hondo, Kumamoto 863-0046, Japan; and Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Japan (Y.K., M.T.). Received November 1, 2000; revision requested December 23; revision received March 13, 2001; accepted April 18. Address correspondence to T.H. (e-mail: toshinor@beige.ocn.ne.jp).

PURPOSE: To assess the luminal morphology of the extracranial internal carotid artery at three-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic (CT) angiography and how this factor affects measurement of maximum carotid arterial stenoses at conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively, conventional intraarterial DSA and 3D CT angiography were performed in 42 carotid arteries in 21 patients with suspected carotid artery disease. The longest axis length–perpendicular axis length (L/P) ratios of the arterial lumen on the cross-sectional images at the most stenotic area and distal nonstenotic area were analyzed by acquiring multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images at 3D CT angiography. The maximum stenosis was measured at each modality with North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria.

RESULTS: The L/P ratios in the most stenotic areas ranged from 1.0 to 3.2 (mean, 1.5 ± 0.5 [SD]). The mean difference in maximum percentage of stenosis between the two modalities for L/P ratios of 2.0 or greater was significantly greater than that for L/P ratios of less than 1.5 (P < .05). Three carotid arteries with 70%–99% stenosis, with grades determined with only 3D CT angiography, had L/P ratios of 2.0 or greater.

CONCLUSION: On MPR images at 3D CT angiography, the lumen of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis showed a wide range of shapes. When a carotid artery has a high L/P ratio, the luminal morphology of the carotid artery stenosis may affect the assessment of maximum stenosis of the internal carotid artery at conventional DSA.

Index terms: Carotid arteries, angiography, 1722.1247 • Carotid arteries, CT, 1722.12113, 1722.12117 • Carotid arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 1722.721 • Computed tomography (CT), three-dimensional, 1722.12117 • Digital subtraction angiography, 1722.721 • Digital subtraction angiography, comparative studies




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Saba and G. Mallarini
MDCTA of Carotid Plaque Degree of Stenosis: Evaluation of Interobserver Agreement
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W41 - W46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H.M. Silvennoinen, S. Ikonen, L. Soinne, M. Railo, and L. Valanne
CT Angiographic Analysis of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Manual Assessment, Semiautomatic Vessel Analysis, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 97 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. M. Lell, K. Anders, M. Uder, E. Klotz, H. Ditt, F. Vega-Higuera, T. Boskamp, W. A. Bautz, and B. F. Tomandl
New Techniques in CT Angiography
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2006; 26(suppl_1): S45 - S62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Ota, K. Takase, H. Rikimaru, M. Tsuboi, T. Yamada, A. Sato, S. Higano, T. Ishibashi, and S. Takahashi
Quantitative Vascular Measurements in Arterial Occlusive Disease
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1141 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
N. Hoggard, T. E. Feasby, J. Kennedy, H. Quan, and W. A. Ghali
Importance of the imaging modality in decision making about carotid endarterectomy
Neurology, October 12, 2004; 63(7): 1340 - 1341.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. J.W. Koelemay, P. J. Nederkoorn, J. B. Reitsma, and C. B. Majoie
Systematic Review of Computed Tomographic Angiography for Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease
Stroke, October 1, 2004; 35(10): 2306 - 2312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
K. C. Wang, D. Saloner, and J. H. Rapp
Characteristics of Carotid Plaque as Risk Factors for Stroke
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, September 1, 2004; 16(3): 193 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Corti, M. Alerci, R. Wyttenbach, P. L. Pedrazzi, A. Gallino, T. Hirai, and Y. Korogi
Usefulness of Multiplanar Reconstructions in Evaluation of Carotid CT Angiography * Drs Hirai and Korogi respond:
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 290 - 292.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.