HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text All Versions of this Article: 2233011026v1 223/3/798    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Winer-Muram, H. T. Articles by Meyer, C. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Winer-Muram, H. T. Articles by Meyer, C. A.

Volumetric Growth Rate of Stage I Lung Cancer prior to Treatment: Serial CT Scanning¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (H.T.W.M., S.G.J., R.D.T., A.M.A., M.T., D.J.C., C.A.M.); and the Department of Radiology, Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, 1481 W 10th St, Rm C-2172, Indianapolis, IN 46202 (H.T.W.M., A.M.A.). Received June 12, 2001; revision requested July 10; final revision received December 14; accepted December 20. Address correspondence to H.T.W.M. (e-mail: hwinermu@iupui.edu).

PURPOSE: To determine the range of growth rates of stage I lung cancers prior to treatment by using volumetric measurement at serial chest computed tomographic (CT) examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 50 patients who underwent two CT examinations at 25-day or greater intervals. Tumor craniocaudal length and cross-sectional diameters and perimeters were used to volumetrically model each tumor in three ways (spherical, elliptical, perimeter). Volumes were compared by determining Pearson correlation coefficients. By using these volumes, tumor doubling time was determined for each patient.

RESULTS: Volumes measured with all three methods were highly correlated. With the perimeter method, median doubling time was 181 days, with a very wide range. Eleven (22%) of 50 tumors had doubling times of 465 days or more. There was considerable overlap in doubling time between histologic subtypes. Assuming constant growth, only three (6%) of the 50 tumors would have been the size of a stage IA tumor for less than 1 year.

CONCLUSION: Comparison of tumor volumes at serial CT examinations reveals a very wide range of growth rates. Some tumors grow so slowly that biopsy is required to prove they are malignant.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Lung neoplasms, 60.32 • Lung neoplasms, CT, 60.12115

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. A.M. van der Veldt, M. R. Meijerink, A. J.M. van den Eertwegh, A. Bex, G. de Gast, J. B.A.G. Haanen, and E. Boven Sunitinib for Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Cancer: Primary Tumor Response Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 14(8): 2431 - 2436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. B. Bach, G. A. Silvestri, M. Hanger, and J. R. Jett Screening for Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 69S - 77S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. C. Black, D. R. Aberle, C. D. Berg, and For the Executive Committee of the National Lung S Large Field Trial for Lung Cancer Screening: Putting the Wrong Cart before the Horse? Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 314 - 316. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Mehrara, E. Forssell-Aronsson, H. Ahlman, and P. Bernhardt Specific Growth Rate versus Doubling Time for Quantitative Characterization of Tumor Growth Rate Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 67(8): 3970 - 3975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Jennings, H. T. Winer-Muram, M. Tann, J. Ying, and I. Dowdeswell Distribution of Stage I Lung Cancer Growth Rates Determined with Serial Volumetric CT Measurements Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 554 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. C. Black Randomized Clinical Trials for Cancer Screening: Rationale and Design Considerations for Imaging Tests J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3252 - 3260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-P. Revel, A. Merlin, S. Peyrard, R. Triki, S. Couchon, G. Chatellier, and G. Frija Software volumetric evaluation of doubling times for differentiating benign versus malignant pulmonary nodules. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 135 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. T. Winer-Muram The solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 34 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Tateishi, H. Uno, K. Yonemori, M. Satake, M. Takeuchi, and Y. Arai Prediction of Lung Adenocarcinoma Without Vessel Invasion: A CT Scan Volumetric Analysis Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5): 3276 - 3283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. MacMahon, J. H. M. Austin, G. Gamsu, C. J. Herold, J. R. Jett, D. P. Naidich, E. F. Patz Jr, and S. J. Swensen Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement from the Fleischner Society Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 395 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. K. Leader, T. E. Warfel, C. R. Fuhrman, S. K. Golla, J. L. Weissfeld, R. S. Avila, W. D. Turner, and B. Zheng Pulmonary Nodule Detection with Low-Dose CT of the Lung: Agreement Among Radiologists Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 973 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Sortini, K. Maravegias, and A. Sortini Difficulty of early diagnosis in patients with solitary pulmonary nodule J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2005; 129(5): 1196 - 1196. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Sortini, C. V. Feo, G. Carrella, P. Carcoforo, E. Pozza, and A. Sortini Drawbacks to videothoracoscopic management of solitary pulmonary nodules Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 752 - 752. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. F. Patz Jr, S. J. Swensen, and J. E. Herndon II Estimate of Lung Cancer Mortality From Low-Dose Spiral Computed Tomography Screening Trials: Implications for Current Mass Screening Recommendations J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2004; 22(11): 2202 - 2206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Jennings, H. T. Winer-Muram, R. D. Tarver, and M. O. Farber Lung Tumor Growth: Assessment with CT--Comparison of Diameter and Cross-sectional Area with Volume Measurements Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 866 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-P. Revel, A. Bissery, M. Bienvenu, L. Aycard, C. Lefort, and G. Frija Are Two-dimensional CT Measurements of Small Noncalcified Pulmonary Nodules Reliable? Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 453 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-P. Revel, C. Lefort, A. Bissery, M. Bienvenu, L. Aycard, G. Chatellier, and G. Frija Pulmonary Nodules: Preliminary Experience with Three-dimensional Evaluation Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 459 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. T. Winer-Muram, S. G. Jennings, C. A. Meyer, Y. Liang, A. M. Aisen, R. D. Tarver, and R. C. McGarry Effect of Varying CT Section Width on Volumetric Measurement of Lung Tumors and Application of Compensatory Equations Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 184 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. I. Block Negative aspects of preoperative delay in early stage non-small cell lung cancer: Reply to the editor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 610 - 610. [Full Text] [PDF]