|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thoracic Imaging |
1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Japan (M.T., K.K., J.A., C.K.); Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Japan (S.K.); Department of Radiology, Osaka Chuo Hospital, Japan (N.K.); and Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan (M.T., T.J., N.T., O.H.). Received August 25, 2000; revision requested October 14; final revision received September 20, 2001; accepted December 11. Address correspondence to M.T. (e-mail: tubamoto@radiol.med.osaka-u.ac.jp).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the detection of small peripheral lung tumors on chest radiographs on the basis of the size of the tumor and its extent of ground-glass opacity (GGO) at thin-section computed tomography (CT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chest radiographs of 75 patients with peripheral carcinomas 20 mm in diameter or smaller (26 localized bronchioloalveolar carcinomas [BACs], 49 other carcinomas) and 60 normal chest radiographs were retrospectively reviewed individually by 10 radiologists. The extent of GGO within the lesions at thin-section CT was reviewed retrospectively. The detection rates for localized BAC and other carcinomas on chest radiographs were calculated and were correlated with tumor size and extent of GGO.
RESULTS: The mean sensitivity for detection of small peripheral carcinomas was 58.5% ± 8.8 (standard error) for localized BAC and was 78.6% ± 5.1 for other carcinomas (P = .024). Lesions that were smaller than 15 mm in diameter and had an extent of GGO of 70% or greater at thin-section CT were more difficult to detect than tumors that had larger diameters or less extensive GGO (
2 = 8.13, df = 1, P = .004).
CONCLUSION: The detection of small peripheral carcinomas on chest radiographs is influenced by tumor size and extent of GGO as seen at thin-section CT.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Lung, ground-glass opacification, 60.32 Lung neoplasms, CT, 60.12118 Lung neoplasms, diagnosis, 60.32
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K Ono, T Yoshitake, K Akahane, Y Yamada, T Maeda, M Kai, and T Kusama Comparison of a digital flat-panel versus screen-film, photofluorography and storage-phosphor systems by detection of simulated lung adenocarcinoma lesions using hard copy images Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(934): 922 - 927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Leader, T. E. Warfel, C. R. Fuhrman, S. K. Golla, J. L. Weissfeld, R. S. Avila, W. D. Turner, and B. Zheng Pulmonary Nodule Detection with Low-Dose CT of the Lung: Agreement Among Radiologists Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 973 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Yu, W.-H. Hsu, N.-Y. Hsu, T.-Y. Lin, T.-C. Hsia, S.-S. Sun, and C.-H. Kao The Use of Dual Phase 201Tl SPECT for Differentiating Pulmonary Malignancies from Benign Lesions Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2004; 34(8): 445 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Berlin Potential Legal Ramifications of Whole-Body CT Screening: Taking a Peek into Pandora's Box Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 317 - 322. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |