HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text All Versions of this Article: 2252010845v1 225/2/519    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huo, Z. Articles by Cummings, S. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huo, Z. Articles by Cummings, S. A.

Computerized Analysis of Digitized Mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutation Carriers¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (Z.H., M.L.G., D.E.W., C.E.M., W.Z.) and Hematology and Oncology (O.I.O., S.A.C.), University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637; and Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia (B.L.W.). From the 1998 and 2000 RSNA scientific assemblies. Received April 27, 2001; revision requested June 8; final revision received April 18, 2002; accepted May 16. Supported in part by grants from the NIH (P20 CA66132 and R21 CA79711), from the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (DAMD 17-96-1-6058 and 17-99-1209), and from the Elizabeth Boughton Charitable Fund and the Falk Medical Research Fund. Address correspondence to M.L.G. (e-mail: m-giger@uchicago.edu).

PURPOSE: To evaluate, by using computer image analysis, the mammographic density patterns of women with germ-line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in comparison with those of women at low risk of developing breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammograms from 30 carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and from 142 low-risk women were collected retrospectively and digitized. In addition, 60 of the 142 low-risk women were randomly selected and age matched at 5-year intervals with the 30 mutation carriers. Mammographic features were extracted from the central regions of the breast images to characterize the mammographic density and heterogeneity of dense portions of the breast. These features were then merged into a single value related to the risk of breast cancer by using linear discriminant analysis. The applicability of these computer-extracted features and the output from linear discriminant analysis to differentiate between the carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and the low-risk women in the entire database and in an age-matched group were evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS: Quantitative analysis of mammograms demonstrated that carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations tended to have dense breast tissue, and their mammographic patterns tended to be low in contrast, with a coarse texture. Linear discriminant analysis resulted in values of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91 and 0.92 in distinguishing between the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and the low-risk women in the entire database and the age-matched group, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The computerized analysis of mammograms suggests that mammographic patterns in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations differ from those of women at low risk for breast cancer. Our computer-extracted features may be useful as radiographic markers for identifying women at high risk for breast cancer.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Breast, diseases, 00.32 • Breast neoplasms, radiography, 00.11 • Computers, diagnostic aid • Genes and genetics • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. J. R. Porter, A. J. Evans, E. J. Cornford, H. C. Burrell, J. J. James, A. H. S. Lee, and J. Chakrabarti Influence of Mammographic Parenchymal Pattern in Screening-Detected and Interval Invasive Breast Cancers on Pathologic Features, Mammographic Features, and Patient Survival Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 676 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Mitchell, A. C. Antoniou, R. Warren, S. Peock, J. Brown, R. Davies, J. Mattison, M. Cook, I. Warsi, D. G. Evans, et al. Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 66(3): 1866 - 1872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kriege, C. T.M. Brekelmans, C. Boetes, P. E. Besnard, H. M. Zonderland, I. M. Obdeijn, R. A. Manoliu, T. Kok, H. Peterse, M. M.A. Tilanus-Linthorst, et al. Efficacy of MRI and Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening in Women with a Familial or Genetic Predisposition N. Engl. J. Med., July 29, 2004; 351(5): 427 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Cuzick, J. Warwick, E. Pinney, R. M. L. Warren, and S. W. Duffy Tamoxifen and Breast Density in Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, April 21, 2004; 96(8): 621 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Harvey and V. E. Bovbjerg Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 29 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]