Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 31, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2263011970

(Radiology 2003;226:880.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2263011970v1
226/3/880    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tombach, B.
Right arrow Articles by Sorensen, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tombach, B.
Right arrow Articles by Sorensen, A. G.
© RSNA, 2003

Neuroradiology

Do Highly Concentrated Gadolinium Chelates Improve MR Brain Perfusion Imaging? Intraindividually Controlled Randomized Crossover Concentration Comparison Study of 0.5 versus 1.0 mol/L Gadobutrol1

Bernd Tombach, MD, Thomas Benner, PhD, Peter Reimer, MD, Gerhard Schuierer, MD, Eva-Maria Fallenberg, MD, Viviane Geens, MD, Thomas Wels, MD and A. Gregory Sorensen, MD

1 From the Dept of Clinical Radiology, Univ of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 33, D-48129 Münster, Germany (B.T., E.M.F.); Dept of Radiology/Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, Massachusetts General Hosp, Boston (T.B., A.G.S.); Dept of Radiology, Karlsruhe, Academic Teaching Hosp of Freiburg, Germany (P.R.); Dept of Radiology, Institute of Neuroradiology, Bezirksklinikum Regensburg, Germany (G.S.); and Schering, Berlin, Germany (V.G., T.W.). Received Dec 3, 2001; revision requested Jan 18, 2002; revision received May 20; accepted Jul 1. Supported in part by Schering, Berlin, Germany. A.G.S. supported in part by grant PHS RO1NS38477. Address correspondence to B.T. (e-mail: tombach@uni-muenster.de).

PURPOSE: To assess the potential advantages of using a 1.0 mol/L versus 0.5 mol/L gadobutrol formulation for magnetic resonance (MR) brain perfusion imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three healthy volunteers were enrolled in an intraindividually controlled, randomized crossover comparison study. Two gadobutrol formulations—0.5 and 1.0 mol/L— were randomly injected during two separate treatment periods. For intraindividual comparison of effectiveness parameters, single-section gradient-echo brain perfusion MR imaging was performed under identical conditions for both investigations. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations were performed. Differences between the two gadobutrol formulations were evaluated at analysis of covariance and tested for statistical significance (P < .05) with a t test.

RESULTS: Use of 1.0 mol/L gadobutrol resulted in a significantly smaller bolus width at half maximum signal intensity decrease, a smaller mean peak time, a higher contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio between gray and white matter, and significant increases in both maximum change in transverse relaxation rate ({Delta}R2max) and differences in peak enhancement in gray matter among all volunteers (P < .001). In white matter, increases in {Delta}R2max (P = .262) and in differences in peak enhancement (P = .262) were smaller and not significant (P = .292). Parameter map analysis revealed improved quality and superior contrast in relative regional cerebral blood flow (P = .034) and mean transit time (P < .001). The lack of difference regarding relative regional cerebral blood volume maps was consistent with the use of the same dose of each gadobutrol formulation.

CONCLUSION: Brain perfusion images obtained with 1.0 mol/L gadobutrol were superior to those obtained with 0.5 mol/L gadobutrol in healthy volunteers examined with the described MR imaging protocol.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Brain, MR, 10.121411, 10.121412, 10.12142, 10.12143, 10.12144 • Contrast media, comparative studies • Gadolinium • Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast media, 13.12143, 14.12143, 15.12143




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Fenchel, A Franow, P Martirosian, M Engels, U Kramer, N I Stauder, U Helber, H Vogler, C D Claussen, and S Miller
1 M Gd-chelate (gadobutrol) for multislice first-pass magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 884 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C W Ryu, D H Lee, H S Kim, J H Lee, C G Choi, S J Kim, and D C Suh
Acquisition of MR perfusion images and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in acute ischaemic stroke patients: which procedure should be done first?
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2006; 79(948): 962 - 967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. T. Kielstein, F. Donnerstag, S. Gasper, J. Menne, A. Kielstein, J. Martens-Lobenhoffer, F. Scalera, J. P. Cooke, D. Fliser, and S. M. Bode-Boger
ADMA Increases Arterial Stiffness and Decreases Cerebral Blood Flow in Humans
Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2024 - 2029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Manka, F. Traber, J. Gieseke, H. H. Schild, and C. K. Kuhl
Three-dimensional Dynamic Susceptibility-weighted Perfusion MR Imaging at 3.0 T: Feasibility and Contrast Agent Dose
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 869 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.