HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text All Versions of this Article: 2271011674v1 227/1/270    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ko, G.-Y. Articles by Yoon, H.-K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ko, G.-Y. Articles by Yoon, H.-K.

Obstruction of the Lacrimal System: Treatment with a Covered, Retrievable, Expandable Nitinol Stent versus a Lacrimal Polyurethane Stent¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (G.Y.K., H.Y.S., T.S.S., K.B.S., H.K.Y.) and Biomedical Engineering (T.H.K.), Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Poongnap-Dong, Songpa-Ku, Seoul 138-736, Korea. Received October 12, 2001; revision requested January 8, 2002; final revision received July 1; accepted August 19. Supported by grant HMP-98-G-2-043 from the Highly Advanced National (HAN) Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea. Address correspondence to H.Y.S. (e-mail: hysong@amc.seoul.kr).

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of a covered nitinol stent with that of a polyurethane stent for treatment of lacrimal system obstructions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A nitinol stent was knit from a single thread of 0.1-mm nitinol wire in a tubular configuration and was covered by dipping the stent into a polyurethane solution. The stent was 4 mm in diameter and 30 or 35 mm long. With fluoroscopic guidance, a covered nitinol stent (n = 33, group A) or a polyurethane stent (n = 35, group B) was placed in 68 patients. The following items were evaluated retrospectively: technical success, procedure time, cumulative patency rate, and complications. An unpaired Student t test was used to analyze the difference between the procedure times. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and a log-rank test were used to compare the cumulative patency rates.

RESULTS: Stent placement was technically successful in 31 (94%) of 33 patients in group A and in all 35 (100%) patients in group B. After stent placement, all patients showed resolution of epiphora. Average procedure time was 400 seconds (range, 270–900 seconds) in group A and 260 seconds (range, 150–900 seconds) in group B. The difference between the procedure times was statistically significant (P = .0003). During the mean follow-up period of 40 months, there was recurrence of epiphora in 30 of 31 patients in group A and 26 of 35 patients in group B. The difference of the cumulative patency rates was statistically insignificant (P = .2).

CONCLUSION: Although the polyurethane stent used for treatment seemed to be more effective than the nitinol stent, selection of these stents for placement should be made with caution, because the long-term patency rates are not encouraging.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Lacrimal gland and duct, 223.24 • Lacrimal gland and duct, interventional procedures, 223.126 • Stents and prostheses

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. B. Hunter, M. T. Yoshino, R. B. Dzioba, R. A. Light, and W. G. Berger Medical Devices of the Head, Neck, and Spine RadioGraphics, January 1, 2004; 24(1): 257 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]