|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Applications |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (Y.O., T.G., H.N., M.H., N.S., M.B., K.N., K.T., N.T., H.M.); and Department of Radiology, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Japan (H.F.). From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 8, 2002; revision requested April 18; final revision received July 16; accepted August 29. Address correspondence to Y.O., Department of Radiology, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-0064, Japan (e-mail: yogiya@gd5.so-net.ne.jp).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) compression ratios of 10:1 and 20:1 on detection of acute cerebral infarction at computed tomography (CT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT images obtained in 25 patients with acute cerebral infarction and 25 patients with no lesions were compressed by means of a JPEG algorithm at ratios of 10:1 and 20:1. Normal and abnormal sections (on original and compressed images) were reviewed by using a color soft-copy computed monochrome cathode ray tube monitor. Five observers rated the presence or absence of a lesion with a 50-point scale (0, definitely absent; 25, equivocal; and 50, definitely present). Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Significant difference was defined as a P value less than .05 for the area tested with a two-tailed paired Student t test.
RESULTS: At ROC analysis, no statistically significant difference was detected for all cases considered together (Az [area under the ROC curve] = 0.887 ± 0.038 [mean ± SD] on noncompressed images, Az = 0.897 ± 0.038 on 10:1 compressed images, and Az = 0.842 ± 0.073 on 20:1 compressed images; P > .05).
CONCLUSION: JPEG compression at ratios of 10:1 and 20:1 was tolerated in the detection of acute cerebral infarction at CT.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Brain, CT, 10.12111 Computed tomography (CT), image processing Data compression Images, interpretation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Lopez, M. Lejeune, P. Escriva, R. Bosch, M. T. Salvado, L. E. Pons, J. Baucells, X. Cugat, T. Alvaro, and J. Jaen Effects of Image Compression on Automatic Count of Immunohistochemically Stained Nuclei in Digital Images J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2008; 15(6): 794 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kim, K. H. Lee, K. J. Kim, R. Mantiuk, S. Hahn, T. J. Kim, and Y. H. Kim Prediction of Perceptible Artifacts in JPEG 2000 Compressed Chest CT Images Using Mathematical and Perceptual Quality Metrics Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 328 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Woo, K. J. Kim, T. J. Kim, S. Hahn, B. Kim, Y. H. Kim, and K. H. Lee JPEG 2000 Compression of Abdominal CT: Difference in Tolerance Between Thin- and Thick-Section Images Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 535 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |