| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Emergency Radiology |
1 From the Division of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology (P.A.P., K.K., F.T.), Division of Medico-Surgical Emergencies (B.V., P.F.U.), and Clinic/Polyclinic of Digestive Surgery (F.I.), Hôpital Cantonal, University of Geneva, 24 rue Micheli-du-Crest, 1211 Geneva-14, Switzerland. Received February 20, 2002; revision requested April 23; revision received June 15; accepted July 25. Address correspondence to P.A.P. (e-mail: pierre-alexandre.poletti@hcuge.ch).
PURPOSE: To evaluate abdominal ultrasonography (US) for indirect (with free fluid analysis only) and direct (with free fluid and parenchymal analysis) detection of organ injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma, with findings at computed tomography (CT) and/or surgery as the standard of diagnosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Abdominal US was performed at hospital admission in consecutive patients with blunt abdominal trauma. The presence of free peritoneal fluid and organ injury were recorded and compared with results of abdominal CT in all hemodynamically stable patients. When US results were considered false-negative for free fluid or organ injury compared with CT results, repeat US was performed within 6 hours. Admission and second US results were compared with CT and/or surgical results to determine sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of US with regard to the presence of free intraperitoneal fluid and/or organ injury.
RESULTS: Two hundred five hemodynamically stable patients underwent abdominal US and CT. CT revealed free fluid in 83 patients and organ injury in 99. Thirty-one (31%) of 99 patients with organ injury did not have free fluid at CT. Three (10%) of the 31 patients required surgery or angiographic embolization. The sensitivity of admission US was 93% (77 of 83 cases) for the diagnosis of free fluid, 41% (39 of 99) for directly demonstrating organ injury, and 72% (71 of 99) for suggesting organ injury by means of both free fluid and organ analysis. At second US, these sensitivities were 96% (80 of 83 cases), 55% (54 of 99) and 84% (83 of 99), respectively.
CONCLUSION: US is highly sensitive for the detection of free intraperitoneal fluid but not sensitive for the identification of organ injuries. In hemodynamically stable patients, the value of US is mainly limited by the large percentage of organ injuries that are not associated with free fluid.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Abdomen, injuries, 78.41, 798.41 • Abdomen, US, 78.1298, 798.1298 • Trauma, 78.41, 798.41
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Christie-Large, D. Michaelides, and S. James Focused assessment with sonography for trauma: the FAST scan Trauma, April 1, 2008; 10(2): 93 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Valentino, C. Serra, P. Pavlica, A. M. Morselli Labate, M. Lima, S. Baroncini, and L. Barozzi Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-enhanced US in Children--Initial Experience Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 903 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. E. Mirvis and M. Korner Invited Commentary * Author's Response RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 241 - 244. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Mauritz and P. Weninger Multislice computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma Trauma, July 1, 2007; 9(3): 195 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. C. Lee, E. L. Ormsby, J. P. McGahan, G. M. Melendres, and J. R. Richards The Utility of Sonography for the Triage of Blunt Abdominal Trauma Patients to Exploratory Laparotomy Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 415 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Luo, V. Zderic, S. Carter, L. Crum, and S. Vaezy Detection of bleeding in injured femoral arteries with contrast-enhanced sonography. J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2006; 25(9): 1169 - 1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. McGahan, S. Horton, E. O. Gerscovich, M. Gillen, J. R. Richards, M. S. Cronan, J. M. Brock, F. Battistella, D. H. Wisner, and J. F. Holmes Appearance of solid organ injury with contrast-enhanced sonography in blunt abdominal trauma: preliminary experience. Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 658 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Valentino, C. Serra, G. Zironi, C. De Luca, P. Pavlica, and L. Barozzi Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Emergency Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Detection of Solid Organ Injuries. Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5): 1361 - 1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. G. ODLE Blunt Pelvic Trauma Radiol. Technol., January 1, 2006; 77(3): 200 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Catalano, R. Lobianco, M. M. Raso, and A. Siani Blunt Hepatic Trauma: Evaluation With Contrast-Enhanced Sonography: Sonographic Findings and Clinical Application J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2005; 24(3): 299 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sato and H. Yoshii Reevaluation of Ultrasonography for Solid-Organ Injury in Blunt Abdominal Trauma J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2004; 23(12): 1583 - 1596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.-A. Poletti, A. Platon, C. D. Becker, G. Mentha, B. Vermeulen, L. H. Buhler, and F. Terrier Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Does the Use of a Second-Generation Sonographic Contrast Agent Help to Detect Solid Organ Injuries? Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1293 - 1301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J P Wyatt and L Jones JournalScan Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2003; 20(5): 471 - 472. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |
