Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 19, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2271020396

(Radiology 2003;227:52.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2271020396v1
227/1/52    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Amin, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Laufer, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Amin, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Laufer, I.
© RSNA, 2003

Gastrointestinal Imaging

Ileocecal Valve: Spectrum of Normal Findings at Double-Contrast Barium Enema Examination1

Lisa C. El-Amin, BA, Marc S. Levine, MD, Stephen E. Rubesin, MD, Janak N. Shah, MD, Michael L. Kochman, MD and Igor Laufer, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (L.C.E., M.S.L., S.E.R., I.L.) and Medicine (J.N.S., M.L.K.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Received April 2, 2002; revision requested June 12; revision received June 19; accepted July 25. Address correspondence to M.S.L. (e-mail: levine@oasis.rad.upenn.edu).

PURPOSE: To characterize the spectrum of normal findings of the ileocecal valve at double-contrast barium enema examination to allow differentiation between a normal valve and one infiltrated by tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of radiology and endoscopy files showed 106 patients who underwent double-contrast barium enema examination and colonoscopy. The radiographic images were reviewed by two authors to determine the morphology of the ileocecal valve and to evaluate whether it appeared normal or abnormal. The radiographic data were then correlated with endoscopic and pathologic findings.

RESULTS: The ileocecal valve was visible in 91 (86%) of 106 patients. It was round or ovoid in 71 patients (78%) and triangular in 20 (22%). In the 88 patients with a normal valve at colonoscopy, mean valve height was 1.7 cm, and mean width was 2.8 cm. The valve was smooth in 75 patients (85%) and smoothly lobulated in 13 (15%). The lips of the valve were symmetric in 77 patients (88%) and asymmetric in 11 (12%). All 87 patients with a normal valve at double-contrast barium enema examination had a normal valve at colonoscopy, whereas the two patients with a valve suspicious for tumor at barium enema examination had neoplasms (one carcinoma and one villous adenoma) at colonoscopy.

CONCLUSION: The ileocecal valve may show a spectrum of normal findings at double-contrast barium enema examination and may appear as a round, ovoid, or triangular structure with a maximal height of nearly 4 cm. The valve may be large, asymmetric, or smoothly lobulated, even in the absence of tumor.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Barium enema examination, 752.1283 • Colon, radiography, 752.1283, 752.92 • Colonoscopy, 752.1289




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. D. O'Connor, R. M. Summers, J. Yao, P. J. Pickhardt, and J. R. Choi
CT Colonography with Computer-aided Polyp Detection: Volume and Attenuation Thresholds to Reduce False-Positive Findings Owing to the Ileocecal Valve
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 426 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. M. Summers, J. Yao, and C. D. Johnson
CT Colonography with Computer-aided Detection: Automated Recognition of Ileocecal Valve to Reduce Number of False-Positive Detections
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 266 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.