Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 27, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2311021559

(Radiology 2004;231:135.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2311021559v1
231/1/135    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luciani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cuenod, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luciani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cuenod, C. A.
© RSNA, 2004

Experimental Studies

Glucose-Receptor MR Imaging of Tumors: Study in Mice with PEGylated Paramagnetic Niosomes1

Alain Luciani, MD, Jean-Christophe Olivier, PharmD, PhD, Olivier Clement, MD, PhD, Nathalie Siauve, MD, PhD, Pierre-Yves Brillet, MD, Bertrand Bessoud, MD, Florence Gazeau, PhD, Ijeoma F. Uchegbu, PhD, Edmond Kahn, PhD, Guy Frija, MD and Charles A. Cuenod, MD, PhD

1 From the Radiology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, INSERM U494, LRI, Faculté Necker, 20 Rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France (A.L., O.C., N.S., P.Y.B., B.B., E.K., G.F., C.A.C.); Laboratoire de Pharmacie Galénique et Biopharmacie, Equipe émergente "Médicaments anti-infectieux et barrière Hémato-encéphalique," Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Poitiers, France (J.C.O.); CNRS UMR 7603, Laboratoire des Milieux Désordonnés Hétérogènes et de Pharmacologie Clinique LMDH, Faculté Paris VI-VII, France (F.G.); and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Strathclyde Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Scotland (I.F.U.). From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received November 25, 2002; revision requested February 20, 2003; revision received May 29; accepted June 30. Address correspondence to C.A.C. (e-mail: ca@cuenod.net).

PURPOSE: To evaluate a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast agent for tumor detection based on paramagnetic nonionic vesicles (niosomes) bearing polyethylene glycol (PEG) and glucose conjugates for the targeting of overexpressed glucose receptors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four gadobenate dimeglumine–loaded niosome preparations including nonconjugated niosomes, niosomes bearing glucose conjugates (N-palmitoyl glucosamine [NPG]), niosomes bearing PEG 4400, and niosomes bearing both PEG and NPG were tested. In vitro cellular uptake was measured at electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) after incubation with human prostate carcinoma, PC3, cells. In vivo distribution was studied at MR imaging 6, 12, and 24 hours after injection, with assessment of tumor, brain, liver, and muscle signal intensity (SI) in 49 mice bearing PC3 cells. Efficiency of targeted contrast agents was assessed with tumor-to-muscle contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Testing for differences was performed with analysis of variance followed by a posteriori Fisher test.

RESULTS: In vitro, gadolinium could be detected at EPR only in cell pellets incubated with niosomes bearing glucose conjugates or niosomes bearing both glucose conjugates and PEG (4.9·10-15 and 4.5·10-15 mol gadolinium per PC3 cell). In vivo, marked predominant tumor enhancement was demonstrated 24 hours after injection of glycosylated PEG niosomes (P < .01); no significant differences were observed following injection of nonconjugated niosomes, glycosylated niosomes, or PEG 4400 niosomes. Twenty-four hours after injection, sole presence of NPG or PEG 4400 on the surface of the niosome led to higher tumor-to-muscle CNR than that observed after injection of nonconjugated niosomes (CNR of 3.3 ± 0.7 [SD], 3.4 ± 2.2, and 0 ± 1.9). Combination of NPG and PEG led to even higher tumor-to-muscle CNR (6.3 ± 2.2).

CONCLUSION: Combination of PEG and glucose conjugates on the surface of niosomes significantly improved tumor targeting of an encapsulated paramagnetic agent assessed with MR imaging in a human carcinoma xenograft model.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Animals • Glucose • Liposomes • Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast media • Neoplasms, experimental studies




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Riviere, M.-S. Martina, Y. Tomita, C. Wilhelm, A. Tran Dinh, C. Menager, E. Pinard, S. Lesieur, F. Gazeau, and J. Seylaz
Magnetic Targeting of Nanometric Magnetic Fluid loaded Liposomes to Specific Brain Intravascular Areas: A Dynamic Imaging Study in Mice
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 439 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Reimer
Tumor-targeted MR Contrast Agents: Hype or Future Hope?
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.