Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 24, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2312030543

(Radiology 2004;231:528.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2312030543v1
231/2/528    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ertl-Wagner, B. B.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ertl-Wagner, B. B.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M. F.
© RSNA, 2004

Neuroradiology

Multi–Detector Row CT Angiography of the Brain at Various Kilovoltage Settings1

Birgit B. Ertl-Wagner, MD, Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann, MD, Roland Bruning, MD, Karin Herrmann, MD, Brad Snyder, MS, Jeffrey D. Blume, PhD and Maximilian F. Reiser, MD

1 From the Institutes of Clinical Radiology (B.B.E.W., R.T.H., K.H., M.F.R.) and Neuroradiology (R.B.), Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany; and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.S., J.D.B.). Received April 7, 2003; revision requested June 24; final revision received September 17; accepted October 21. Address correspondence to B.B.E.W. (e-mail: b.ertl-wagner@t-online.de).

PURPOSE: To investigate image quality and vascular delineation of multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography at various kilovoltage settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were investigated with a standardized CT protocol, with three groups of 10 consecutive patients examined at 80, 120, and 140 kV, respectively. Three blinded readers independently evaluated images and graded image quality parameters, diagnostic confidence, and vascular delineation of intracranial arteries and veins. Vascular CT attenuation values, CT dose indices, and dose length products were assessed quantitatively. For data analysis, a Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric rank F test was used to identify trends and variables that required modeling attention. A proportional odds multinomial regression model was then fit with generalized estimating equations to account for the correlated nature of the data.

RESULTS: Image quality was rated higher with higher kilovoltage settings (P < .001). The severity of imaging artifacts was higher with lower kilovoltage settings (P < .001), while the subjectively rated vessel contrast was lower in the 80-kV group than in the 120-kV group and the 140-kV group (P < .05). Diagnostic confidence was higher in the 120-kV group and 140-kV group (P < .005). Vascular delineation was higher with higher kilovoltage settings for most arterial and venous structures. Differences were more significant for structures in close topographic proximity to bone and for subsegmental arteries and were less significant and, in parts, not significant for the main arterial branches and the large venous sinus. Attenuation values were higher with lower kilovoltage settings (P < .05). The mean dose length product could be reduced from 594 mGy · cm in the 140-kV group to 152 mGy · cm in the 80-kV group.

CONCLUSION: This multireader study of image quality and vessel delineation with cranial multi–detector row CT angiography at various kilovoltage settings demonstrated a superiority of higher voltages with most pronounced effects for vessels adjacent to bone and subsegmental arteries.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Brain, CT, 17.1211 • Computed tomography (CT), image quality, 17.1211 • Computed tomography (CT), multi–detector row, 17.1211




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C.-Y. Yang, Y.-F. Chen, C.-W. Lee, A. Huang, Y. Shen, C. Wei, and H.-M. Liu
Multiphase CT Angiography versus Single-Phase CT Angiography: Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1288 - 1295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. P. Earls, E. L. Berman, B. A. Urban, C. A. Curry, J. L. Lane, R. S. Jennings, C. C. McCulloch, J. Hsieh, and J. H. Londt
Prospectively Gated Transverse Coronary CT Angiography versus Retrospectively Gated Helical Technique: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 742 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Horiguchi, M. Kiguchi, C. Fujioka, Y. Shen, R. Arie, K. Sunasaka, and K. Ito
Radiation Dose, Image Quality, Stenosis Measurement, and CT Densitometry Using ECG-Triggered Coronary 64-MDCT Angiography: A Phantom Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 315 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Linn, B. Ertl-Wagner, K.C. Seelos, M. Strupp, M. Reiser, H. Bruckmann, and R. Bruning
Diagnostic Value of Multidetector-Row CT Angiography in the Evaluation of Thrombosis of the Cerebral Venous Sinuses
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 946 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Leschka, E. Oechslin, L. Husmann, L. Desbiolles, B. Marincek, M. Genoni, R. Pretre, R. Jenni, S. Wildermuth, and H. Alkadhi
Pre- and Postoperative Evaluation of Congenital Heart Disease in Children and Adults with 64-Section CT
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 829 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Waaijer, M. Prokop, B. K. Velthuis, C. J. G. Bakker, G. A. P. de Kort, and M. S. van Leeuwen
Circle of Willis at CT Angiography: Dose Reduction and Image Quality--Reducing Tube Voltage and Increasing Tube Current Settings
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 832 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. V. Sahani, S. P. Kalva, P. F. Hahn, and S. Saini
16-MDCT Angiography in Living Kidney Donors at Various Tube Potentials: Impact on Image Quality and Radiation Dose
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 115 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Nakayama, K. Awai, Y. Funama, D. Liu, T. Nakaura, Y. Tamura, and Y. Yamashita
Lower tube voltage reduces contrast material and radiation doses on 16-MDCT aortography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W490 - W497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Hausleiter, T. Meyer, M. Hadamitzky, E. Huber, M. Zankl, S. Martinoff, A. Kastrati, and A. Schomig
Radiation Dose Estimates From Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography in Daily Practice: Impact of Different Scanning Protocols on Effective Dose Estimates
Circulation, March 14, 2006; 113(10): 1305 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.