Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 29, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2313030544

(Radiology 2004;231:785.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2313030544v1
231/3/785    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lim, A. K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Blomley, M. J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lim, A. K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Blomley, M. J. K.
© RSNA, 2004

Ultrasonography

Evidence for Spleen-specific Uptake of a Microbubble Contrast Agent: A Quantitative Study in Healthy Volunteers1

Adrian K. P. Lim, FRCR, Nayna Patel, MSc, Robert J. Eckersley, PhD, Simon D. Taylor-Robinson, MD, FRCP, David O. Cosgrove, FRCR and Martin J. K. Blomley, MD, FRCR

1 From the Imaging Sciences Department, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre (A.K.P.L., N.P., R.J.E., S.D.T.R., D.O.C., M.J.K.B.) and Department of Medicine A, Faculty of Medicine (N.P., S.D.T.R.), Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, DuCane Rd, London W12 0HS, England. Received April 7, 2003; revision requested June 24; final revision received November 6; accepted November 20. Supported by Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan, and Bracco, Milan, Italy. A.K.P.L. supported by the United Kingdom National Health Service Research and Development Initiative and the Kodak Scholarship, Royal College of Radiologists. Address correspondence to A.K.P.L. (e-mail: a.lim@imperial.ac.uk).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the microbubble contrast agent BR1.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers were injected via arm vein with a 1.2-mL bolus of BR1. Ultrasonographic images of liver and right kidney and of spleen and left kidney were obtained intermittently for 5 minutes with low-mechanical-index software (to minimize microbubble destruction) that shows stationary microbubbles in green. Percentage total uptake was calculated as the number of green pixels in the region of interest for each organ over time, divided by the total pixels. Relative uptake, the ratio of total uptake in liver to that in right kidney and of total uptake in spleen to that in left kidney, and differential uptake, the difference in total uptake between liver and right kidney and between spleen and left kidney, were calculated. Total uptake for each organ was plotted against time, and the gradient of a best-fit straight line was calculated. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare mean uptake values in each subject. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons in sex and age.

RESULTS: Total uptake declined over 5 minutes in left and right kidney and in liver (from 88% ± 10% [1 minute] to 67% ± 14% [5 minutes]), but not in spleen (range, 90%–99%). Mean relative uptake ± 1 SD for spleen increased from 2.3 ± 0.7 (1 minute) to 3.7 ± 2.3 (5 minutes) (P = .005) but for liver was constant: 2.1 ± 0.9 (1 minute) and 2.3 ± 0.4 (5 minutes) (P = .06). Mean differential uptake ± 1 SD for spleen increased from 51.3% ± 14.9% (1 minute) to 65.0% ± 9.1% (5 minutes) (P = .002). Significant difference was seen over time in total uptake gradients between spleen and left kidney (P = .014) but not between liver and right kidney or right and left kidney. No difference was seen between men and women or with age.

CONCLUSION: BR1 produces spleen-specific enhancement that is longer (5 minutes) than the blood pool phase.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Kidney, US, 81.12988 • Liver, US, 761.12988 • Microbubbles • Spleen, US, 775.12988 • Ultrasound (US), contrast media




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Gorg, R. Kring, and T. Bert
Transcutaneous Contrast-Enhanced Sonography of Peripheral Lung Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): W420 - W429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. K. P. Lim, N. Patel, R. J. Eckersley, R. D. Goldin, H. C. Thomas, D. O. Cosgrove, S. D. Taylor-Robinson, and M. J. K. Blomley
Hepatic Vein Transit Time of SonoVue: A Comparative Study with Levovist
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 130 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
C. Gorg, C. Graef, and T. Bert
Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Differential Diagnosis of an Inhomogeneous Spleen of Unknown Cause in Patients With Pain in the Left Upper Quadrant
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2006; 25(6): 729 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
V R Stewart and P S Sidhu
New directions in ultrasound: microbubble contrast.
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 79(939): 188 - 194.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Gorg and T. Bert
Second-generation sonographic contrast agent for differential diagnosis of perisplenic lesions.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 621 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H Maruyama, S Matsutani, H Saisho, Y Mine, N Kamiyama, T Hirata, and M Sasamata
Real-time blood-pool images of contrast enhanced ultrasound with Definity in the detection of tumour nodules in the liver
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2005; 78(930): 512 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. Catalano, F. Sandomenico, I. Matarazzo, and A. Siani
Contrast-Enhanced Sonography of the Spleen
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1150 - 1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.