Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print May 27, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2321031254

(Radiology 2004;232:140.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2321031254v1
232/1/140    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mullerad, M.
Right arrow Articles by Scardino, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mullerad, M.
Right arrow Articles by Scardino, P. T.
© RSNA, 2004

Genitourinary Imaging

Prostate Cancer: Detection of Extracapsular Extension by Genitourinary and General Body Radiologists at MR Imaging1

Michael Mullerad, MD, Hedvig Hricak, MD, PhD, Liang Wang, MD, Hui-Ni Chen, MS, Michael W. Kattan, PhD and Peter T. Scardino, MD

1 From the Departments of Urology (M.M., M.W.K., P.T.S.) and Radiology (H.H., L.W., H.N.C.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021. Received August 6, 2003; revision requested September 18; revision received December 19; accepted January 13, 2004. Supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01 CA76423. Address correspondence to H.H. (e-mail: muellnea@mskcc.org).

PURPOSE: To determine whether predictive value of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings in detection of prostate cancer extracapsular extension (ECE) is significantly affected by the reader’s subspecialty experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cohort study, 344 consecutive patients with biopsy-proved prostate cancer underwent endorectal MR imaging followed by surgery. Likelihood of ECE described in MR imaging reports was compared with clinical predictor variables. ECE was determined from the final pathologic report on specimens resected at surgery. Readers of MR images were classified into genitourinary MR imaging radiologists (n = 4) and general body MR imaging radiologists (n = 6). For data analysis, Wilcoxon rank sum and {chi}2 tests, as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, were used. A difference with P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS: Univariate analysis results demonstrated that all predictors except clinical stage were significantly associated with detection of ECE in both groups of readers (P < .05). In the genitourinary MR imaging radiologist group of patients, area under the ROC curve for endorectal MR imaging findings (0.833) was larger than areas under the curves for all other predictors (0.566–0.701). In the general body MR imaging radiologist group of patients, area under the ROC curve for endorectal MR imaging findings (0.646) was not larger than areas under the curves for all other predictors (0.582–0.793). Results of multivariate analysis of two models, one with all predictors and another with all predictors except endorectal MR imaging findings, demonstrated a significant increase in area under the ROC curve with endorectal MR images interpreted by genitourinary MR imaging radiologists (P = .019 and .31, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Endorectal MR imaging findings are significant predictors for detection of ECE when MR images are interpreted by genitourinary radiologists experienced with MR imaging of the prostate.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Diagnostic radiology, observer performance • Magnetic resonance (MR), coils, 844.121411, 844.121419 • Magnetic resonance (MR), spectroscopy, 844.12145 • Prostate, biopsy, 844.1261 • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. N. Bloch, E. Furman-Haran, T. H. Helbich, R. E. Lenkinski, H. Degani, C. Kratzik, M. Susani, A. Haitel, S. Jaromi, L. Ngo, et al.
Prostate Cancer: Accurate Determination of Extracapsular Extension with High-Spatial-Resolution Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR Imaging Initial Results
Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 176 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Kawakami, I. Fukui, J. Yonese, Y. Okubo, S. Yamamoto, T. Tsukamoto, and Y. Ishikawa
Antegrade Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy with Preliminary Ligation of Vascular Pedicles in 614 Consecutive Patients
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2007; 37(7): 528 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. W. T. P. J. Heijmink, J. J. Futterer, T. Hambrock, S. Takahashi, T. W. J. Scheenen, H. J. Huisman, C. A. Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, B. C. Knipscheer, L. A. L. M. Kiemeney, J. A. Witjes, et al.
Prostate Cancer: Body-Array versus Endorectal Coil MR Imaging at 3 T--Comparison of Image Quality, Localization, and Staging Performance
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 184 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Hricak, P. L. Choyke, S. C. Eberhardt, S. A. Leibel, and P. T. Scardino
Imaging Prostate Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 28 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Graser, A. Heuck, B. Sommer, J. Massmann, J. Scheidler, M. Reiser, and U. Mueller-Lisse
Per-Sextant Localization and Staging of Prostate Cancer: Correlation of Imaging Findings with Whole-Mount Step Section Histopathology
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 84 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. A. Reinsberg, G. S. Payne, S. F. Riches, S. Ashley, J. M. Brewster, V. A. Morgan, and N. M. deSouza
Combined Use of Diffusion-Weighted MRI and 1H MR Spectroscopy to Increase Accuracy in Prostate Cancer Detection
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 91 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Wang, J. Zhang, L. H. Schwartz, H. Eisenberg, N. M. Ishill, C. S. Moskowitz, P. Scardino, and H. Hricak
Incremental Value of Multiplanar Cross-Referencing for Prostate Cancer Staging with Endorectal MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 99 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Wang, H. Hricak, M. W. Kattan, H. N. Chen, K. Kuroiwa, H. F. Eisenberg, and P. T. Scardino
Prediction of Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value of Adding Endorectal MR Imaging to the Kattan Nomogram
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 182 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Wang, H. Hricak, M. W. Kattan, L. H. Schwartz, S. C. Eberhardt, H.-N. Chen, and P. T. Scardino
Combined endorectal and phased-array MRI in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 743 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Sala, S. C. Eberhardt, O. Akin, C. S. Moskowitz, C. N. Onyebuchi, K. Kuroiwa, N. Ishill, M. J. Zelefsky, J. A. Eastham, and H. Hricak
Endorectal MR Imaging before Salvage Prostatectomy: Tumor Localization and Staging
Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 176 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Wang, H. Hricak, M. W. Kattan, H.-N. Chen, P. T. Scardino, and K. Kuroiwa
Prediction of Organ-confined Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value of MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Imaging to Staging Nomograms
Radiology, December 12, 2005; (2005) 2382041905.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. J. Futterer, S. W. T. P. J. Heijmink, T. W. J. Scheenen, G. J. Jager, C. A. Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, J. A. Witjes, and J. O. Barentsz
Prostate Cancer: Local Staging at 3-T Endorectal MR Imaging--Early Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 184 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. J. Futterer, M. R. Engelbrecht, H. J. Huisman, G. J. Jager, C. A. Hulsbergen-van De Kaa, J. A. Witjes, and J. O. Barentsz
Staging Prostate Cancer with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Endorectal MR Imaging prior to Radical Prostatectomy: Experienced versus Less Experienced Readers
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 541 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Beyersdorff, K. Taymoorian, T. Knosel, D. Schnorr, R. Felix, B. Hamm, and H. Bruhn
MRI of Prostate Cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Comparison of Image Quality in Tumor Detection and Staging
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1214 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H Hricak
MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging in the pre-treatment evaluation of prostate cancer
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(Special_Issue_2): S103 - S111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Schoder, H. W.D. Yeung, and S. M. Larson
CT in PET/CT: Essential Features of Interpretation
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1249 - 1251.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Wang, M. Mullerad, H.-N. Chen, S. C. Eberhardt, M. W. Kattan, P. T. Scardino, and H. Hricak
Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value of Endorectal MR Imaging Findings for Prediction of Extracapsular Extension
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 133 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.