Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 27, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2331030326

(Radiology 2004;233:129.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2331030326v1
233/1/129    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphey, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gannon, F. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphey, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gannon, F. H.


Musculoskeletal Imaging

Imaging of Periosteal Osteosarcoma: Radiologic-Pathologic Comparison1

Mark D. Murphey, MD, James S. Jelinek, MD, H. Thomas Temple, MD2, Donald J. Flemming, CDR, MC, USN and Francis H. Gannon, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiologic Pathology (M.D.M.) and Orthopedic Pathology (F.H.G.), Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 6825 16th St NW, Bldg 54, Rm M-133A, Washington, DC 20306; Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.D.M., D.J.F.) and Surgery (H.T.T.), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md; Department of Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (M.D.M.); Department of Surgery, Orthopedic Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC (H.T.T.); Department of Radiology, Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (J.S.J.); and Department of Radiology, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Md (D.J.F.). Received February 25, 2003; revision requested May 23; revision received February 2, 2004; accepted March 2. Address correspondence to M.D.M. (e-mail: murphey@afip.osd.mil).

PURPOSE: To review the imaging appearance of periosteal osteosarcoma, with pathologic comparison.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for 40 pathologically confirmed periosteal osteosarcomas were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographic data were recorded, and radiographs (n = 40), bone scintigrams (n = 10), angiograms (n = 2), and computed tomographic (CT) (n = 11) and magnetic resonance (MR) (n = 12) images were evaluated for lesion location and size, cortical changes, marrow involvement, and intrinsic characteristics by two musculoskeletal radiologists, with agreement by consensus. Pathology reports were reviewed for presence and predominance of histologic components (fibrous, chondroid, and osteoid), tumor grade, and marrow involvement.

RESULTS: There were 25 male (62%) and 15 female (38%) patients with an age range of 10–37 years (average age, 20 years). The most frequent lesion locations were the diaphysis of the tibia (16 patients) or of the femur (15 patients). Radiographs showed a broad-based soft-tissue mass that was attached to the cortex (all patients) and showed cortical thickening (33 patients), cortical scalloping/erosion (37 patients), and/or perpendicular periosteal reaction (38 patients) extending into the soft-tissue mass. Soft-tissue masses were well defined in 91%–100% of cases and surrounded a median of 50%–55% of the cortex. Lesions commonly showed low attenuation at CT (10 patients) and high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images (10 patients), reflecting the high water content of these largely chondroblastic lesions. Focal areas of adjacent marrow replacement were common at MR imaging (nine patients) but represented reactive changes unless they were in direct continuity with the overlying soft-tissue mass (this was rare, occurring in only one patient, and represented marrow invasion). Review of pathology reports revealed that all lesions contained chondroid tissue, which predominated in 34 patients.

CONCLUSION: The radiologic appearance of periosteal osteosarcoma is a broad-based surface soft-tissue mass causing extrinsic erosion of thickened underlying diaphyseal cortex and perpendicular periosteal reaction extending into the soft-tissue component. Reactive marrow changes are commonly seen at MR imaging, but true marrow invasion is rare.

Index terms: Bone neoplasms, 416.3221, 428.3221, 438.3221, 458.3221, 49.3221 • Bone neoplasms, CT, 416.1211, 428.1211, 438.1211, 458.1211, 49.1211 • Bone neoplasms, diagnosis, 416.3221, 428.3221, 438.3221, 458.3221, 49.3221 • Bone neoplasms, MR, 416.1214, 428.1214, 438.1214, 458.1214, 49.1214 • Osteosarcoma, 416.3221, 428.3221, 438.3221, 458.3221, 49.3221




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. I. Aqeilan, F. Trapasso, S. Hussain, S. Costinean, D. Marshall, Y. Pekarsky, J. P. Hagan, N. Zanesi, M. Kaou, G. S. Stein, et al.
Targeted deletion of Wwox reveals a tumor suppressor function
PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 3949 - 3954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.M. Motimaya and S.P. Meyers
Melorheostosis Involving the Cervical and Upper Thoracic Spine: Radiographic, CT, and MR Imaging Findings
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1198 - 1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.