Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 27, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2331031342

(Radiology 2004;233:226.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2331031342v1
233/1/226    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, F. F.
© RSNA, 2004

Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Percutaneous Nephrostomy of Nondilated Renal Collecting Systems with Fluoroscopic Guidance: Technique and Results1

Uday Patel, MB, ChB, MRCP, FRCR and Fuad F. Hussain, FRCR, FRCS

1 From the Department of Radiology, St George’s Hospital, Blackshaw Rd, London SW11 5PF, England. Received August 28, 2003; revision requested October 23; revision received December 18; accepted January 30, 2004. Address correspondence to U.P. (e-mail: uday.patel@stgeorges.nhs.uk).

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review experience with a double-puncture technique for percutaneous nephrostomy of nondilated renal collecting systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 5-year period, 15 patients (26 kidneys) without calyceal dilatation at ultrasonography (US) who required nephrostomy drainage were studied. Eleven patients (21 kidneys) had ureteral leaks or fistulas, one patient (one kidney) had a renal pelvic stone, one patient (one kidney) was suspected of having a ureteral tumor, and the final two patients (three kidneys) had acute nondilated renal failure. Mean age was 62 years (range, 20–78 years); 13 patients were men and two were women. A double-puncture technique was used with fluoroscopic guidance (supplemented with US in some patients who had renal failure). After intravenous administration of iodinated contrast material, a 22-gauge needle was inserted into the opacified renal pelvis, and double-contrast pyelography was performed by using air or carbon dioxide to allow visualization and distention of the nondependent calyces for definitive renal access with an 18-gauge 5-F sheath-needle set and a hydrophilic wire. After serial dilation, a nephrostomy or nephroureteral catheter was inserted. Success and major complication rates were studied by reviewing radiologic and clinical case notes.

RESULTS: Catheter placement was successful in 25 (96%) of 26 kidneys after one, two, or three passes with the sheath-needle set. In all successful cases, the calyx was accurately punctured. There were two major complications. One patient developed hematuria that required transfusion but no further intervention; another sustained a renal pelvic injury, but this was believed to be due to excessive dilation of the pelviureteral junction, not faulty renal puncture. There were no cases of septicemia.

CONCLUSION: With a double-puncture technique and air or carbon dioxide distention, nephrostomy was achieved in 25 (96%) of all nondilated renal collecting systems. There were two major complications (two [8%] of 25 kidneys, two [13%] of 15 patients), but only one was secondary to the renal puncture.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Kidney, interventional procedures, 81.1263 • Ureter, obstructions, 82.843




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
A Horton, L Ratnam, J Madigan, G Munneke, and U Patel
Nephrostomy -- why, how and what to look out for
Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 29 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.