Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 18, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2331031352

(Radiology 2004;233:67.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2331031352v1
233/1/67    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nimsky, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fahlbusch, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nimsky, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fahlbusch, R.
© RSNA, 2004

Neuroradiology

Intraoperative High-Field-Strength MR Imaging: Implementation and Experience in 200 Patients1

Christopher Nimsky, MD, Oliver Ganslandt, MD, Boris von Keller, MD, Johann Romstöck, MD and Rudolf Fahlbusch, MD

1 From the Department of Neurosurgery, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany. Received August 23, 2003; revision requested NoGvember 6; final revision received January 26, 2004; accepted February 16. Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Wilhelm-Sander-Stiftung. Address correspondence to C.N. (e-mail: nimsky@nch.imed.uni-erlangen.de).

PURPOSE: To review the initial clinical experience with intraoperative high-field-strength magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of brain lesions in 200 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients (mean age, 46.1 years; range, 7–84 years), most of whom had glioma or pituitary adenoma, were examined with a 1.5-T MR imager equipped with a rotating operating table and located in a radiofrequency-shielded operating theater. A navigation microscope placed inside the 0.5-mT zone and used in combination with a ceiling-mounted navigation system enabled integrated microscope-based neuronavigation. The extent of resection depicted at intraoperative imaging, the surgical consequences of intraoperative imaging, and the clinical practicability of the operating room setup were analyzed.

RESULTS: Seventy-seven resections with a transsphenoidal approach, 100 craniotomies, and 23 burr-hole procedures were performed. In 55 (27.5%) of 200 patients, intraoperative MR imaging had immediate surgical consequences (eg, extension of resection in 39% of patients with pituitary adenoma or glioma). In 108 patients the navigation system was used, and for 37 of those patients, functional imaging data were integrated into the navigation system. There was nearly no difference in quality between pre- and intraoperative images. Intraoperative workflow with intraoperative patient transport for imaging was straightforward, and imaging in most cases began less than 2 minutes after sterile covering of the surgical site. No complications resulted from high-field-strength MR imaging.

CONCLUSION: The high-field-strength MR imager was successfully adapted for intraoperative use with the integrated neuronavigation system. Intraoperative MR imaging provided valuable information that allowed intraoperative modification of the surgical strategy.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Brain, MR, 18.12141, 18.12143 • Brain neoplasms, 18.36, 18.37, 18.38 • Brain, surgery • Magnetic resonance (MR), guidance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T.P. Duprez, A. Jankovski, C. Grandin, L. Hermoye, G. Cosnard, and C. Raftopoulos
Intraoperative 3T MR Imaging for Spinal Cord Tumor Resection: Feasibility, Timing, and Image Quality Using a "Twin" MR-Operating Room Suite
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2008; 29(10): 1991 - 1994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. S. Lewin, S. G. Nour, M. L. Meyers, A. K. Metzger, R. J. Maciunas, M. Wendt, J. L. Duerk, A. Oppelt, and W. R. Selman
Intraoperative MRI with a Rotating, Tiltable Surgical Table: A Time Use Study and Clinical Results in 122 Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1096 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Stadlbauer, O. Ganslandt, R. Buslei, T. Hammen, S. Gruber, E. Moser, M. Buchfelder, E. Salomonowitz, and C. Nimsky
Gliomas: Histopathologic Evaluation of Changes in Directionality and Magnitude of Water Diffusion at Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 803 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. Karavitaki, S. Cudlip, C. B. T. Adams, and J. A. H. Wass
Craniopharyngiomas
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2006; 27(4): 371 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
R. Fahlbusch, B. v Keller, O. Ganslandt, J. Kreutzer, and C. Nimsky
Transsphenoidal surgery in acromegaly investigated by intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 153(2): 239 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.