HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text All Versions of this Article: 2332030994v1 233/2/323    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saini, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Saini, S.

Multi–Detector Row CT: Principles and Practice for Abdominal Applications¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, 32 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114. Received June 24, 2003; revision requested August 29; revision received September 25; accepted October 28. Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: ssaini@partners.org).

Abdominal imaging with multi–detector row computed tomography (CT) can be performed during short breath holds. On 16-channel multi–detector row CT scanners, the effective detector row thickness, depending on the manufacturer, is typically 1.0–1.5 mm, which results in a beam collimation of 16–24 mm. At a gantry rotation speed of 0.5 second and a pitch of 1, the table travel speed will be 32–48 mm/sec. At a smaller effective detector row thickness and a narrower beam collimation, a slightly higher pitch may be needed to obtain short–breath-hold CT scans. Typically, transverse scans are viewed at a reconstructed section thickness of 3–5 mm, with thinner sections used for CT angiography and whenever off-axial reformations are obtained. The radiologic technique should be optimized according to the transverse section thickness used for interpretation, and the contrast material administration protocol should be optimized according to the clinical problem, with the scanning triggered for enhancement of a target organ.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Abdomen, CT, 78.1211 • Computed tomography (CT), multi–detector row, 78.1211 • Computed tomography (CT), technology, 78.1211 • Radiology and radiologists, How I Do It

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M. Ho, R. C. Nelson, and D. M. DeLong Determining Contrast Medium Dose and Rate on Basis of Lean Body Weight: Does This Strategy Improve Patient-to-Patient Uniformity of Hepatic Enhancement during Multi-Detector Row CT? Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 431 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. C. Dalrymple, S. R. Prasad, F. M. El-Merhi, and K. N. Chintapalli Price of Isotropy in Multidetector CT RadioGraphics, January 1, 2007; 27(1): 49 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Kalra and S. Saini Standardized Nomenclature and Description of CT Scanning Techniques Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 657 - 660. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Douglas-Akinwande, K. A. Buckwalter, J. Rydberg, J. L. Rankin, and R. H. Choplin Multichannel CT: Evaluating the Spine in Postoperative Patients with Orthopedic Hardware RadioGraphics, October 1, 2006; 26(suppl_1): S97 - S110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Hurwitz, T. Yoshizumi, R. E. Reiman, P. C. Goodman, E. K. Paulson, D. P. Frush, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and L. Barnes Radiation Dose to the Fetus from Body MDCT During Early Gestation. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 871 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. C. Dalrymple, S. R. Prasad, M. W. Freckleton, and K. N. Chintapalli Informatics in Radiology (infoRAD): Introduction to the Language of Three-dimensional Imaging with Multidetector CT RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1409 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]