Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 13, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2343030333

(Radiology 2005;234:674.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2343030333v1
234/3/674    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merkle, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stellato, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merkle, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stellato, T. A.
© RSNA, 2005

Review

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Clinically Severe Obesity: Normal Appearance and Spectrum of Complications at Imaging1

Elmar M. Merkle, MD, Peter T. Hallowell, MD, Cathleen Crouse, RN, Dean A. Nakamoto, MD and Thomas A. Stellato, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Erwin Rd, Duke North, Rm 1417, Durham, NC 27710 (E.M.M.); and Departments of Surgery (P.T.H., C.C., T.A.S.) and Radiology (D.A.N.), University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Received March 3, 2003; revision requested May 23; final revision received January 16, 2004; accepted February 16. Address correspondence to E.M.M. (e-mail: elmar .merkle@duke.edu).

Surgery currently appears to be the most effective method to curtail the effects of morbid obesity and all of its comorbid conditions. Although the ideal procedure has yet to be devised, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has proved to be successful for many morbidly obese patients pursuing weight loss and increased health. As the technical aspects of this procedure become less cumbersome and the patient population increases, it is vital for radiologists to be proficient in the specific evaluation of these patients, in order to provide optimal care. Complications can be minimized, managed more efficiently, or prevented with prompt evaluation by the radiologist. It is important to appreciate the patency of both the gastrojejunostomy and the jejunojejunostomy, as well as adequate progression of contrast material before the patient is discharged (preferably 24–72 hours after surgery). Follow-up complications include anastomotic leak, staple-line disruption, stomal stenosis, occlusion of the Roux limb, small-bowel obstruction due to adhesions or internal hernia, and obstruction of the enteroenterostomy leading to acute gastric distention. These complications may be life threatening, since clinical symptoms are often inconclusive. To achieve optimal outcome, therefore, conventional radiographic and computed tomographic studies should not be delayed.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. R. Carucci, R. C. Conklin, and M. A. Turner
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery for Morbid Obesity: Evaluation of Leak into Excluded Stomach with Upper Gastrointestinal Examination
Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 504 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. C. Chandler, G. Srinivas, K. N. Chintapalli, W. H. Schwesinger, and S. R. Prasad
Imaging in Bariatric Surgery: A Guide to Postsurgical Anatomy and Common Complications
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 122 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. C. Martin, E. M. Merkle, and W. M. Thompson
Review of internal hernias: radiographic and clinical findings.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 703 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.