HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text All Versions of this Article: 2343031536v1 234/3/824    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bhargavan, M. Articles by Sunshine, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bhargavan, M. Articles by Sunshine, J. H.

Utilization of Radiology Services in the United States: Levels and Trends in Modalities, Regions, and Populations¹

¹ From the Research Department, American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Dr, Reston, VA 20191 (M.B., J.H.S.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Conn (J.H.S.). Received September 26, 2003; revision requested December 8; final revision received March 17, 2004; accepted May 12. Address correspondence to M.B. (e-mail: mythreyib@acr.org).

PURPOSE: To assess the most recent available data for levels and trends in utilization of radiology procedures across populations, modalities, and geographic areas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aggregated claims data from Medicare enrollees for all radiology procedures and from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative survey of almost 25 000 Americans, for some radiology procedures, were used to calculate population-based utilization for the relevant age groups. Limited private insurer data also were obtained. All radiology utilization was measured and reported, irrespective of provider specialty. Average levels and percentiles of utilization were measured according to modality, and average annual rates of increase in utilization were compared across modalities, data sources, and regions. Rates of increase in utilization according to modality and state were compared for correlation with state characteristics and initial utilization levels.

RESULTS: In 2001, 4176 diagnostic and 274 therapeutic radiology procedures were performed per 1000 Medicare non–managed care enrollees. Nearly one-half of diagnostic procedures (n = 2057) involved radiography. The other half involved computed tomography (CT) (n = 391), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (n = 114), ultrasonography (US) (n = 921), interventional radiology (n = 215), mammography (n = 221), and nuclear medicine (n = 249). On average, between 1998 and 2001, utilization per Medicare enrollee increased 16% per year for MR imaging and 7%–15% per year for CT, US, interventional radiology, and nuclear medicine, while that for radiography increased 1% per year. The proportion of diagnostic radiology procedures performed in ambulatory settings increased from 62% in 1992 to 68% in 2001. There was wide variation across states in utilization by Medicare enrollees. State totals for diagnostic radiology were 3038 in the 10th percentile and 4573 in the 90th percentile. In 1999, MEPS reported average utilization in ambulatory settings as follows: 64 MR imaging, 102 US, 73 mammographic, 326 radiographic, and 43 radiation therapy procedures per 1000 persons (all ages) in the U.S. population.

CONCLUSION: Utilization of high-technology modalities increased rapidly, while that of radiography was relatively stagnant. Variation in utilization among states and census regions was substantial.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. O. Wilson, J. L. Weissfeld, A. Balkan, J. G. Schragin, C. R. Fuhrman, S. N. Fisher, J. Wilson, J. K. Leader, J. M. Siegfried, S. D. Shapiro, et al. Association of Radiographic Emphysema and Airflow Obstruction with Lung Cancer Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2008; 178(7): 738 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Dang, M. K. Kalra, M. A. Blake, T. J. Schultz, E. F. Halpern, and K. J. Dreyer Extraction of Recommendation Features in Radiology with Natural Language Processing: Exploratory Study Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 313 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. W. L. Boland Enhancing CT Productivity: Strategies for Increasing Capacity Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 3 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Hofmann and K B Lysdahl Moral principles and medical practice: the role of patient autonomy in the extensive use of radiological services J. Med. Ethics, June 1, 2008; 34(6): 446 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. D.T. Kent MSc MD, S. F. Hall MSc MD, P. A. Isotalo MD, R. L. Houlden MD, R. L. George MD, and P. A. Groome PhD Increased incidence of differentiated thyroid carcinoma and detection of subclinical disease Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 20, 2007; 177(11): 1357 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. P. Forman Radiologists' Salaries: Should We Worry? Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 755 - 756. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. P. Krestin, J. C. Miller, S. J. Golding, G. G. Frija, G. M. Glazer, H. G. Ringertz, and J. H. Thrall Reinventing Radiology in a Digital and Molecular Age: Summary of Proceedings of the Sixth Biannual Symposium of the International Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology (IS3R), August 25 27, 2005 Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 633 - 638. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. I. Lee, A. Saokar, K. J. Dreyer, J. B. Weilburg, J. H. Thrall, and P. F. Hahn Does Radiologist Recommendation for Follow-up with the Same Imaging Modality Contribute Substantially to High-Cost Imaging Volume? Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 857 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Ebbert, C. Meghea, S. Iturbe, H. P. Forman, M. Bhargavan, and J. H. Sunshine The State of Teleradiology in 2003 and Changes Since 1999 Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): W103 - W112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Meghea and J. H. Sunshine Retirement patterns and plans of radiologists. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1405 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Sunshine, and C. Meghea, How could the radiologist shortage have eased? Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1160 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Licurse, D. D. Saket, J. H. Sunshine, C. D. Maynard, and H. P. Forman Update on the diagnostic radiology employment market: findings through 2005. Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): W249 - W254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Gottlieb Imaging for Whom: Patient or Physician? Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1399 - 1403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. D. Saket, C. C. Nwanze, C. D. Maynard, J. H. Sunshine, and H. P. Forman Update on the Diagnostic Radiologist Employment Market: Findings Through 2004 Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1408 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Sunshine, R. S. Lewis, and M. Bhargavan A Portrait of Interventional Radiologists in the United States Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1103 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bhargavan and J. H. Sunshine Workload of Radiologists in the United States in 2002-2003 and Trends Since 1991-1992 Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 920 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]