HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text All Versions of this Article: 2343031871v1 234/3/923    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goodman, L. R. Articles by Washington, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goodman, L. R. Articles by Washington, L.

CT of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolus: Does Iso-osmolar Contrast Agent Improve Vascular Opacification?¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226-3596. Received November 21, 2003; revision requested February 6, 2004; revision received May 6; accepted June 2. Supported by a grant from the Amersham Corporation, Princeton, NJ. Address correspondence to L.R.G. (e-mail: lgoodman@mcw.edu).

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the vascular attenuation achieved with the iso-osmolar dimeric contrast agent iodixanol with that achieved with the nonionic monomeric contrast agent iohexol for computed tomographic (CT) venography after CT pulmonary angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained, and 51 consecutive patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography and CT venography were recruited. A 130-mL dose of iodixanol 320 was injected intravenously at a rate of 4 mL/sec and followed by injection of 50 mL of saline. CT venography was performed after 3.5 minutes. From prior studies, 51 patients of similar weight were picked as control subjects. They received a similar iodine load with iohexol 300 and were studied with a similar technique. Section thickness was 1.25 mm for pulmonary emboli and 5 mm for deep venous thrombosis. Test and control group characteristics (ie, sex, age, and weight) were not significantly different (P > .05). Additionally, in test patients who had undergone CT pulmonary angiography and CT venography during the two preceding years, current and previously obtained CT scans were compared (ie, paired studies). Regions of interest were measured in four pulmonary artery and four lower extremity vein locations by two independent observers.

RESULTS: Iodixanol increased average attenuation by 7 HU (P < .05) in the lower extremities and decreased average attenuation by 42 HU (P < .05) in the pulmonary arteries. In the 11 paired studies, similar results were obtained.

CONCLUSION: Iodixanol caused a modest but statistically significant improvement in venous attenuation and a decrease in arterial attenuation. The diagnostic importance of this small increase in venous attenuation is not clear.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Arakawa, T. Kohno, T. Hiki, and Y. Kaji CT Pulmonary Angiography and CT Venography: Factors Associated with Vessel Enhancement Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 156 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Ghaye, A. Nchimi, C. T. Noukoua, and R. F. Dondelinger Does Multi-Detector Row CT Pulmonary Angiography Reduce the Incremental Value of Indirect CT Venography Compared with Single-Detector Row CT Pulmonary Angiography? Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 256 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]