Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 26, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2371040758

(Radiology 2005;237:274.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2371040758v1
237/1/274    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brem, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Welch, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brem, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Welch, B. L.
© RSNA, 2005

Nuclear Medicine

Occult Breast Cancer: Scintimammography with High-Resolution Breast-specific Gamma Camera in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer1

Rachel F. Brem, MD, Jocelyn A. Rapelyea, MD, Gilat Zisman, BS, Kevin Mohtashemi, MD, Joyce Raub, MS, RT, Christine B. Teal, MD, Stan Majewski, PhD and Benjamin L. Welch, PhD

1 From Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging and Intervention Center, (R.F.B., J.A.R., G.Z., K.M., J.R.) and Department of Surgery, Breast Care Center (C.B.T.), George Washington University Medical Center, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20037; and the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, Va (S.M., B.L.W.). Received May 4, 2004; revision requested July 14; revision received October 1; accepted November 15. Supported by a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb, Billerica, Mass. Address correspondence to R.F.B. (e-mail: rbrem{at}mfa.gwu.edu).

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate a high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera for depicting occult breast cancer in women at high risk for breast cancer but with normal mammographic and physical examination findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent were obtained. The study was HIPAA compliant. Ninety-four high-risk women (age range, 36–78 years; mean, 55 years) with normal mammographic (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] 1 or 2) and physical examination findings were evaluated with scintimammography. After injection with 25–30 mCi (925–1110 MBq) of technetium 99m sestamibi, patients were imaged with a high-resolution small-field-of-view breast-specific gamma camera in craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections. Scintimammograms were prospectively classified according to focal radiotracer uptake as normal (score of 1), with no focal or diffuse uptake; benign (score of 2), with minimal patchy uptake; probably benign (score of 3), with scattered patchy uptake; probably abnormal (score of 4), with mild focal radiotracer uptake; and abnormal (score of 5), with marked focal radiotracer uptake. Mammographic breast density was categorized according to BI-RADS criteria. Patients with normal scintimammograms (scores of 1, 2, or 3) were followed up for 1 year with an annual mammogram, physical examination, and repeat scintimammography. Patients with abnormal scintimammograms (scores of 4 or 5) underwent ultrasonography (US), and those with focal hypoechoic lesions underwent biopsy. If no lesion was found during US, patients were followed up with scintimammography. Specific pathologic findings were compared with scintimammographic findings.

RESULTS: Of 94 women, 78 (83%) had normal scintimammograms (score of 1, 2, or 3) at initial examination and 16 (17%) had abnormal scintimammograms (score of 4 or 5). Fourteen (88%) of the 16 patients had either benign findings at biopsy or no focal abnormality at US; in two (12%) patients, invasive carcinoma was diagnosed at US-guided biopsy (9 mm each at pathologic examination).

CONCLUSION: High-resolution breast-specific scintimammography can depict small (<1-cm), mammographically occult, nonpalpable lesions in women at increased risk for breast cancer not otherwise identified at mammography or physical examination.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. B. Hruska, S. W. Phillips, D. H. Whaley, D. J. Rhodes, and M. K. O'Connor
Molecular Breast Imaging: Use of a Dual-Head Dedicated Gamma Camera to Detect Small Breast Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): 1805 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. F. Brem, A. C. Floerke, J. A. Rapelyea, C. Teal, T. Kelly, and V. Mathur
Breast-specific Gamma Imaging as an Adjunct Imaging Modality for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 651 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.