Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 26, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2371041294

(Radiology 2005;237:348.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2371041294v1
237/1/348    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Subramaniam, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Swarbrick, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Subramaniam, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Swarbrick, M.
© RSNA, 2005

Ultrasonography

Deep Venous Thrombosis: Withholding Anticoagulation Therapy after Negative Complete Lower Limb US Findings1

Rathan M. Subramaniam, MBBS, BMedSc, MD, FRANCR, Rebekah Heath, RN, Tina Chou, MBChB, Kim Cox, RN, Gavin Davis, MBChB, FRANCR and Michael Swarbrick, BMBCh, FRCR, FRCS

1 From the Department of Radiology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand (R.M.S., R.H., T.C., K.C., G.D., M.S.); and Departments of Radiology (R.M.S.)andMedicalEducation (R.M.S.), Waikato Clinical School, University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand. Received July 25, 2004; revision requested September 29; revision received October 26; accepted November 11. Address correspondence to R.M.S., Department of Medical Imaging, Canberra Hospital and Australian National University, Garran, ACT 2605, Australia (e-mail: rathan.subramaniam{at}act.gov.au).

PURPOSE: To establish the safety of withholding anticoagulation therapy after negative findings at a complete lower limb ultrasonographic (US) examination of the symptomatic leg for suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Regional ethics committee approval and patient consent were obtained. A total of 542 consecutive ambulatory patients presented to the emergency department and were prospectively recruited from April 2001 to May 2003. Of these patients, 16 were excluded, and radiology residents and sonographers performed a complete lower limb US examination by means of compression and Doppler US in 526 patients. Patients with negative US findings received no anticoagulation therapy, and they were observed for occurrence of any thromboembolic event for 3 months. Patients with progressive or new symptoms that were indicative of thromboembolism within the follow-up period underwent objective testing with US, computed tomographic (CT) pulmonary angiography, or both.

RESULTS: There were 413 patients (78.5%) with US findings that were negative for DVT and 113 patients (21.5%) with findings that were positive. There were 64 patients (56.6%) with DVT isolated to the calf and 49 (43.4%) with proximal DVT. Of the 413 patients with negative initial US findings, 16 (3.9%) underwent a second US examination for new or progressive symptoms of DVT, one patient (0.25%) underwent CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism, and one patient (0.25%) underwent both US and CT pulmonary angiography during the 3-month follow-up period. One of these patients (0.24%; 95% confidence interval: 0.01%, 1.3%) developed pulmonary embolism, which was diagnosed with CT pulmonary angiography. DVT was not diagnosed in any patient, and no patient died during follow-up. The negative predictive value of a complete single lower limb US examination to exclude clinically important DVT is 99.6% (95% confidence interval: 98.4%, 99.9%).

CONCLUSION: A single negative complete lower limb US examination is sufficient to exclude clinically important DVT, and it is safe to withhold anticoagulation therapy after negative complete lower limb US findings were obtained in patients suspected of having symptomatic lower limb DVT. New or progressive symptoms require further objective imaging.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. S. Landefeld
Noninvasive Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis
JAMA, October 8, 2008; 300(14): 1696 - 1697.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Li, J. Salanitri, S. Tutton, E. E. Dunkle, J. R. Schneider, J. A. Caprini, L. N. Pierchala, P. M. Jacobs, and R. R. Edelman
Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis: Evaluation with Ferumoxytol-enhanced MR Imaging and Dual-Contrast Mechanism--Preliminary Experience
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 873 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. M. Subramaniam, T. Chou, R. Heath, and R. Allen
Importance of Pretest Probability Score and D-Dimer Assay Before Sonography for Lower Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 206 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Complete Leg Ultrasound Sufficiently Rules Out DVT
Journal Watch (General), October 11, 2005; 2005(1011): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.