| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, CHU de Charleroi (CHUC), Charleroi, Belgium (D.T., P.B., O.A., S.S.); Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Mons, Belgium (I.P.); Statistical Unit, Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium (V.D.M.); and Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium (P.A.G.). Received August 17, 2004; revision requested October 28; revision received November 17; accepted December 30. Address correspondence to D.T., Department of Radiology, RHMS Clinique Louis Caty, 136 rue Louis Caty, B-7331-Baudour, Belgium (e-mail: denis.tack{at}skynet.be).
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced low-dose multi–detector row computed tomography (CT) with those of contrast material–enhanced standard-dose multi–detector row CT in patients suspected of having acute diverticulitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. One hundred ten consecutive patients (40 men, 70 women; age range, 30–82 years; mean, 57 years) suspected of having acute diverticulitis underwent unenhanced multi–detector row CT with 4 x 2.5-mm collimation, 120 kVp, and 30 effective mAs, as well as contrast-enhanced standard-dose multi–detector row CT with the same parameters but with 120 mAs. All scans were independently read by four readers. Intra- and interobserver agreements were calculated with the 
statistic. Contrast-enhanced standard-dose scans read by three other experts and considered together with results from colonoscopy, surgery, and pathologic evaluation were used as reference. Differences in sensitivity and specificity between readers, radiation doses, and reading sessions were investigated. Pearson exact test and logistic regression models were used.
RESULTS: Colon diverticulitis was present in 39 patients (34%) and was graded as mild in 22 patients (56%) and severe in 17 (44%). Agreement within and between readers was good to excellent. No significant difference was observed in sensitivity (P ranging from .081 to >.99) or in specificity (P ranging from .326 to >.99) for any sign or overall diagnosis between radiation doses by all readers, except wall thickening, which for one reader had a higher specificity at low dose than at standard dose (P = .025). No significant difference in misclassification was detected between doses, regardless of the reader (P ranging from .481 to >.99). At both doses, the most predictive sign for acute diverticulitis was retroperitoneal fat stranding (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Low-dose unenhanced multi–detector row CT has a diagnostic performance similar to that of contrast-enhanced standard-dose multi–detector row CT in patients suspected of having acute diverticulitis.
© RSNA, 2005
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Keyzer, S. Pargov, D. Tack, V. Creteur, P. Bohy, V. De Maertelaer, and P. A. Gevenois Normal Appendix in Adults: Reproducibility of Detection with Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 507 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. C. Lucey, J. C. Varghese, A. Hochberg, M. A. Blake, and J. A. Soto CT-Guided Intervention with Low Radiation Dose: Feasibility and Experience Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1187 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Low-Dose CT Without Contrast for Evaluating Acute Diverticulitis Journal Watch (General), October 11, 2005; 2005(1011): 2 - 2. [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |
