Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print September 16, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2372040653

(Radiology 2005;237:555.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2372040653v1
237/2/555    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Monyé, C.
Right arrow Articles by van Der Lugt, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Monyé, C.
Right arrow Articles by van Der Lugt, A.
© RSNA, 2005

Head and Neck Imaging

Sixteen–Detector Row CT Angiography of Carotid Arteries: Comparison of Different Volumes of Contrast Material with and without a Bolus Chaser1

Cécile de Monyé, MD, Filippo Cademartiri, MD, Thomas T. de Weert, MD, Dorine A. M. Siepman, MD, Diederik W. J. Dippel, MD, PhD and Aad van Der Lugt, MD, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology (C.d.M., F.C., T.T.d.W., A.v.d.L.) and Neurology (D.A.M.S., D.W.J.D.), Erasmus Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands. From the 2003 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received April 9, 2004; revision requested June 22; final revision received November 10; accepted December 14. Supported by Revolving Fund 2002, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam. Address correspondence to A.v.d.L. (e-mail: a.vanderlugt{at}erasmusmc.nl).

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare different volumes of intravenously administered contrast material with and without a bolus chaser at 16–detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography of the carotid arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent were obtained. Seventy-five consecutive patients (44 men, 31 women; mean age, 63 years; range, 22–85 years) were allocated to one of three protocols: group 1, 80 mL of contrast material; group 2, 80 mL of contrast material followed by 40 mL of saline; and group 3, 60 mL of contrast material followed by 40 mL of saline. Bolus tracking was used to synchronize contrast material injection with CT scanning. The attenuation in Hounsfield units was measured from the ascending aorta to the intracranial arteries at 1-second intervals. Differences were tested with the Student t test.

RESULTS: The maximum attenuation was reached in the proximal internal carotid artery in all groups. The addition of a bolus chaser to 80-mL contrast material resulted in a higher mean attenuation (323 HU ± 39 vs 351 HU ± 60, P = .06), higher maximum attenuation (393 HU ± 53 vs 425 HU ± 76, P = .09), and higher minimum attenuation (240 HU ± 34 vs 264 HU ± 48, P < .05). Group 3 had lower mean, maximum, and minimum attenuation than did groups 1 and 2 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION: The addition of a bolus chaser to 80 mL of contrast material results in a slightly higher attenuation. Decreasing the volume of contrast material from 80 to 60 mL results in a significantly lower attenuation.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
T. T. de Weert, M. Ouhlous, E. Meijering, P. E. Zondervan, J. M. Hendriks, M. R.H.M. van Sambeek, D. W.J. Dippel, and A. van der Lugt
In Vivo Characterization and Quantification of Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque Components With Multidetector Computed Tomography and Histopathological Correlation
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2006; 26(10): 2366 - 2372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Rosovsky and H. Rusinek
Dose-related Nephrotoxicity.
Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 614 - 614.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. de Monye, T. T. de Weert, W. Zaalberg, F. Cademartiri, D. A. M. Siepman, D. W. J. Dippel, and A. van der Lugt
Optimization of CT angiography of the carotid artery with a 16-MDCT scanner: craniocaudal scan direction reduces contrast material-related perivenous artifacts.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1737 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.