HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text All Versions of this Article: 2381041832v1 238/1/184    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fütterer, J. J. Articles by Barentsz, J. O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fütterer, J. J. Articles by Barentsz, J. O.

Prostate Cancer: Local Staging at 3-T Endorectal MR Imaging—Early Experience¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (J.J.F., S.W.T.P.J.H., T.W.J.S., G.J.J., J.O.B.), Pathology (C.A.H.), and Urology (J.A.W.), University Medical Center Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein zuid 10, NL 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. From the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received October 25, 2004; revision requested December 29; revision received January 3, 2005; accepted January 25; final version accepted February 28. Supported by a grant from the Dutch Cancer Society. Address correspondence to J.J.F. (e-mail: J.Futterer{at}rad.umcn.nl).

Purpose: To prospectively investigate the local staging accuracy of 3-T endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for prostate cancer by using whole-mount-section histopathologic analysis as the standard of reference.

Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. In 35 consecutive patients (median age, 62.3 years) with biopsy-proved prostate cancer, 3-T endorectal MR imaging was performed. High-spatial-resolution endorectal T2-weighted fast spin-echo images of the prostate were obtained in three planes. MR images were prospectively evaluated by two experienced radiologists and a third radiologist who was less experienced with regard to local disease extent by using five established extracapsular criteria. Whole-mount-section histopathologic analysis was the standard of reference. Evaluation was performed according to octant and patient. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, overall accuracy, and interobserver agreement were calculated.

Results: Thirty-two patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were enrolled in this study. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of local staging were 94% (30 of 32), 88% (seven of eight), and 96% (23 of 24), respectively, for both experienced radiologists, and these values were 81% (26 of 32), 50% (four of eight), and 92% (22 of 24), respectively, for the less experienced radiologist. There was substantial agreement between both experienced readers ( = 0.42–0.79) and moderate agreement between the less experienced reader and the experienced readers with respect to all extracapsular criteria. In regard to the three cases of minimal capsular invasion, two were detected by both experienced radiologists.

Conclusion: In this study, high accuracy for staging of prostate cancer at 3-T endorectal MR imaging, with moderate to substantial observer agreement, was demonstrated. In addition, minimal capsular invasion could be detected.

© RSNA, 2005