HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text All Versions of this Article: 2381050489v1 238/1/135    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jaffe, T. A. Articles by Paulson, E. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jaffe, T. A. Articles by Paulson, E. K.

Small-Bowel Obstruction: Coronal Reformations from Isotropic Voxels at 16-Section Multi–Detector Row CT¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710. Received March 23, 2005; revision requested May 13; revision received June 23; final version accepted July 18. Supported in part by GE Healthcare. Address correspondence to T.A.J. (e-mail: jaffe002{at}mc.duke.edu).

Purpose: To retrospectively assess the added value of coronal reformations of the abdomen and pelvis from isotropic voxels by using 16-section multi–detector row computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction (SBO).

Materials and Methods: This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board of this medical center with a waiver of informed consent. One hundred consecutive patients (40 men and 60 women; mean age, 55 years) suspected of having SBO and abdominal pain underwent 16-section multi–detector row CT with coronal reformations. Twenty-nine patients had a final diagnosis of SBO, and 71 patients did not. Three independent readers blinded to the diagnosis interpreted the CT scout scan, then transverse scans alone, and then transverse plus coronal scans for the presence of SBO and abnormal wall enhancement. Confidence was scored with a 1–5 scale (1 = absent, 5 = present).

Results: Mean sensitivity and specificity of CT scout alone, transverse CT alone, and transverse plus coronal CT for the diagnosis of SBO were 88% and 86%, 87% and 87%, and 87% and 90%, respectively (not significant). In patients without SBO, transverse plus coronal CT enhanced confidence in the exclusion of SBO (P = .01). In patients with SBO, transverse plus coronal CT enhanced confidence in the diagnosis of SBO and identification of abnormal wall enhancement (P = .01).

Conclusion: Transverse 16-section multi–detector row CT data sets are an excellent test for the diagnosis of SBO, while the addition of coronal reformations obtained from these isotropic data sets adds confidence to the diagnosis and exclusion of SBO.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. M. Thompson, R. K. Kilani, B. B. Smith, J. Thomas, T. A. Jaffe, D. M. Delong, and E. K. Paulson Accuracy of Abdominal Radiography in Acute Small-Bowel Obstruction: Does Reviewer Experience Matter? Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): W233 - W238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]