|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cardiac Imaging |
1 From the Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, German Heart Institute Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany (C.J., I.P., B.S., R.G., E.F., E.N.); Department of Cardiology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (C.J.); and Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.). Received November 29, 2004; revision requested January 28, 2005; revision received March 11; accepted April 5; final version accepted May 17. Address correspondence to C.J. (e-mail: jahnke{at}dhzb.de).
Purpose: To prospectively evaluate breath-hold capability and patterns, coronary artery rest periods, and ß-blocker use in coronary magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
Materials and Methods: Ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained. In 210 consecutive patients (mean age, 61.8 years ± 10.3 [standard deviation]; 146 men, 64 women), breath-hold patterns and maximal capability were assessed at expiration with dynamic navigator MR imaging (temporal resolution, 1 second). Left coronary artery (LCA) and right coronary artery (RCA) rest periods were determined at transverse cine imaging (steady-state free precession, retrospective gating, 40 phases per cycle). Before and after ß-blockade, rest periods were assessed in 25 additional patients (mean age, 61.4 years ± 7.1; 20 men, five women). Differences were tested within groups with paired Student t test and between groups with unpaired Student t test (continuous variables) and
2 test (categoric variables). Pearson correlation was used to test the relationship between rest period and heart rate.
Results: Four distinct breath-hold patterns, characterized by diaphragmatic motion, were identified: pattern 1, steady plateau (55% of patients); 2, initial drift followed by plateau (12%); 3, continuous drift (19%); and 4, irregular, unsteady behavior (14%). Mean breath-hold capability with patterns 1 and 2 was 29 seconds ± 13 (range, 1064 seconds). The rest period of LCA was longer than that of RCA (163 msec ± 75 vs 123 msec ± 60; P < .01) and began earlier in the cardiac cycle (521 msec ± 149 vs 540 msec ± 160; P < .01); In a minority of patients, LCA rest period began later (21%) or was shorter (14%). With no pharmacologic intervention, correlation between rest period duration and heart rate was weak (LCA, r = 0.52; RCA, r = 0.38; P < .01). However, ß-blockade significantly lowered heart rate (61.3 beats/min ± 7.2 vs 82.6 beats/min ± 12.5, P < .001) and increased rest duration (LCA, 201.8 msec ± 83.6 vs 111.8 msec ± 44.55; RCA, 134.8 msec ± 57.3 vs 83.1 msec ± 35.8; P < .001).
Conclusion: In 33% of patients (patterns 3 and 4), breath-hold pattern was unsuitable for high-spatial-resolution breath-hold MR imaging. LCA and RCA rest periods showed large variability in starting point and duration, with no correlation to heart rate.
© RSNA, 2006
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Wyttenbach, A. Braghetti, M. Wyss, M. Alerci, L. Briner, P. Santini, L. Cozzi, M. Di Valentino, M. Katoh, C. Marone, et al. Renal Artery Assessment with Nonenhanced Steady-State Free Precession versus Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 186 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |