Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 7, 2006, 10.1148/radiol.2383050419

(Radiology 2006;239:113.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2383050419v1
239/1/113    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, H. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, B. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, H. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, B. I.
© RSNA, 2006

Gastrointestinal Imaging

Preoperative Assessment of Resectability of Hepatic Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Combined CT and Cholangiography with Revised Criteria1

Ho Yun Lee, MD, Se Hyung Kim, MD, Jeong Min Lee, MD, Sun-Whe Kim, MD, Jin-Young Jang, MD, Joon Koo Han, MD and Byung Ihn Choi, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (H.Y.L., S.H.K., J.M.L., J.K.H., B.I.C.); and Department of Surgery, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S.W.K., J.Y.J.). Received March 12, 2005; revision requested May 10; revision received June 7; accepted June 21; final version accepted June 21. Address correspondence to J.K.H. (e-mail: hanjk{at}radcom.snu.ac.kr).

Purpose: To retrospectively assess the accuracy of combined multiphasic computed tomography (CT) and direct cholangiography for evaluation of the resectability of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, on the basis of revised criteria for unresectability, by using surgery as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was waived. From 1998 to 2003, 55 patients (37 men, 18 women; mean age ± standard deviation, 59 years ± 12) with surgically proved hilar cholangiocarcinomas who underwent preoperative CT (single–detector row CT, n = 26; multi–detector row CT, n = 29) and cholangiography were included for study. The authors' revised criteria for unresectable tumor were contralateral hepatic artery invasion; main or contralateral portal vein invasion longer than 2 cm; biliary extension to the contralateral secondary confluence, farther than 2 cm from hepatic hilum; enlarged lymph nodes at the celiac, portacaval, and paraaortic area; and other ancillary findings. Tumor resectability based on these parameters was determined at imaging by two radiologists in consensus. Mann-Whitney U test and weighted {kappa} coefficient of agreement were used for accuracy determination.

Results: For depiction of portal vein invasion (in 26 patients), CT yielded an accuracy of 85.5%. Arterial invasion was found at surgery in 19 patients, with CT providing an accuracy of 92.7%. For prediction of node involvement (15 patients, 27%), CT yielded an accuracy of 83.6%. The extent of ductal involvement could be accurately predicted in 46 patients (84%) (weighted {kappa} = 0.767). In 30 of 42 patients with disease classified as resectable according to revised criteria, disease was found to be resectable at surgery (71.4% positive predictive value). In 11 of 13 patients with disease classified as unresectable according to revised criteria, unresectable disease was confirmed (84.6% negative predictive value). Overall accuracy of resectability was 74.5%.

Conclusion: Combined interpretation of CT and direct cholangiographic images by using our revised criteria resulted in overall accuracy of 74.5% for prediction of resectability for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J.-Y. Choi, M.-J. Kim, J. M. Lee, K. W. Kim, J. Y. Lee, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi
Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Role of Preoperative Imaging with Sonography, MDCT, MRI, and Direct Cholangiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1448 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. I. Sainani, O. A. Catalano, N.-S. Holalkere, A. X. Zhu, P. F. Hahn, and D. V. Sahani
Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and Novel Imaging Techniques
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1263 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. S. Park, J. M. Lee, J.-Y. Choi, M. W. Lee, H. J. Kim, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi
Preoperative Evaluation of Bile Duct Cancer: MRI Combined with MR Cholangiopancreatography Versus MDCT with Direct Cholangiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 396 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. M. Slattery and D. V. Sahani
What Is the Current State-of-the-Art Imaging for Detection and Staging of Cholangiocarcinoma?
Oncologist, September 1, 2006; 11(8): 913 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.