HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text All Versions of this Article: 2393051046v1 239/3/686    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bartella, L. Articles by Huang, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bartella, L. Articles by Huang, W.

Proton MR Spectroscopy with Choline Peak as Malignancy Marker Improves Positive Predictive Value for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: Preliminary Study¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021. From the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received June 21, 2005; revision requested August 5; revision received November 2; final version accepted November 16. Supported by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Sloan Kettering Research and Development Fund. Address correspondence to L.B. (e-mail: bartelll{at}mskcc.org).

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy in patients with suspicious lesions or biopsy-proved cancers at MR imaging by using histologic findings as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: After institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study, breast MR spectroscopy was performed in patients with suspicious or biopsy-proved malignant lesions measuring 1 cm or larger at MR imaging. Single-voxel MR spectroscopy data were collected from a single rectangular volume of interest that encompassed the lesion. MR spectroscopy findings were defined as positive if the signal-to-noise ratio of the choline resonance peak was greater than or equal to 2 and as negative in all other cases. MR spectroscopy findings were then compared with histologic findings.

Results: A total of 56 patients (age range, 20–77 years) with 57 lesions were imaged. The median lesion size at MR imaging was 2.3 cm (range, 1–15 cm). Histologically, 31 (54%) of 57 lesions were malignant, and 26 (46%) were benign. A choline peak was present in 34 of 57 lesions (including all cancers) and in three of 26 benign lesions, giving MR spectroscopy a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 88%. In 40 lesions of unknown histologic type, the use of MR spectroscopy as an adjunct to MR imaging would have significantly (P < .01) increased the positive predictive value of biopsy from 35% to 82%. If biopsy had been performed only on those lesions with a choline peak at MR spectroscopy, biopsy may have been spared in 23 (58%) of 40 lesions, and none of the cancers would have been missed.

Conclusion: Proton MR spectroscopy was successfully incorporated into breast MR imaging studies for lesions measuring 1 cm or larger. This technique may be useful in reducing the number of lesions detected at MR imaging that require biopsy.

© RSNA, 2006

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-M. Lee, J. B. Kaplan, M. P. Murray, and L. Liberman Complete Excision of the MRI Target Lesion at MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy of Breast Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1198 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Yu, J. Yang, and P. Wang Malignant Tumors and Chronic Infections in the Masticator Space: Preliminary Assessment with In Vivo Single-Voxel 1H-MR Spectroscopy AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 716 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. K. Kuhl, F. Traber, J. Gieseke, W. Drahanowsky, N. Morakkabati-Spitz, W. Willinek, M. von Falkenhausen, C. Manka, and H. H. Schild Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice * Part II. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 16 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wang, P.-L. Torng, T.-P. Liu, K.-L. Chen, and T. T.-F. Shih Proton MR Spectroscopy in Normal Breasts Between Pre- and Postmenopausal Women: A Preliminary Study Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 505 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. L. Sah, R. Sharma, H. Kandpal, A. Seith, S. Rastogi, S. Bandhu, and N. R. Jagannathan In Vivo Proton Spectroscopy of Giant Cell Tumor of the Bone Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): W133 - W139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Bartella, S. B. Thakur, E. A. Morris, D. D. Dershaw, W. Huang, E. Chough, M. C. Cruz, and L. Liberman Enhancing Nonmass Lesions in the Breast: Evaluation with Proton (1H) MR Spectroscopy Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 80 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Bartella and W. Huang Proton (1H) MR Spectroscopy of the Breast RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S241 - S252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Stanwell and C. Mountford In Vivo Proton MR Spectroscopy of the Breast RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S253 - S266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. G. ODLE Breast MR Radiol. Technol., September 1, 2006; 78(1): 45M - 66M. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]