Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 30, 2007, 10.1148/radiol.2432060286

(Radiology 2007;243:350.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2432060286v1
243/2/350    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poplack, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poplack, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, K. D.
© RSNA, 2007

Breast Imaging

Electromagnetic Breast Imaging: Results of a Pilot Study in Women with Abnormal Mammograms1

Steven P. Poplack, MD, Tor D. Tosteson, ScD, Wendy A. Wells, MD, Brian W. Pogue, PhD, Paul M. Meaney, PhD, Alexander Hartov, PhD, Christine A. Kogel, BSN, Sandra K. Soho, MS, Jennifer J. Gibson, MS and Keith D. Paulsen, PhD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (S.P.P., C.A.K.), Pathology (W.A.W.), and Obstetrics and Gynecology (S.K.S.), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Dr, HB 7999, Lebanon, NH 03756; Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH (J.J.G., T.D.T.); Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH (T.D.T.); and Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH (B.W.P., P.M.M., A.H., K.D.P.). Received February 14, 2006; revision requested April 18; revision received June 16; accepted July 7; final version accepted September 27. Supported by National Institutes of Health grant P01-CA80139 awarded by the National Cancer Institute. Address correspondence to S.P.P. (e-mail: Steven.P.Poplack{at}Hitchcock.org).

Purpose: To prospectively assess quantitatively the inherent contrast of electromagnetic (EM) properties that can be imaged by using available technology in women with abnormal findings at conventional breast imaging who underwent subsequent biopsy.

Materials and Methods: The protocol was HIPAA compliant and approved by the institutional review board. All participants provided informed consent. Fifty-three women with normal (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] category 1) and ninety-seven women with abnormal (BI-RADS category 4 or 5) screening mammograms were imaged with three EM imaging methods: electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), microwave imaging spectroscopy (MIS), and near-infrared spectral tomography (NIR). A region-of-interest (ROI) analysis was used to assess the EM image properties for comparison of findings with conventional image findings and correlation with specific pathologic parameters for women with abnormal findings. Statistical analyses were conducted.

Results: One hundred fifty participants (age range, 35–81 years) were included. EM image property contrast ratios of 150%–200% were found in breast abnormality ROIs relative to the ipsilateral breast background. Analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences in ROI image summaries of mammographically normal versus abnormal breasts for EIS, across diagnostic groups for NIR, and for MIS (analysis restricted to lesions larger than 1 cm3). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis of the EM properties for cancers among subjects with BI-RADS category 4 or 5, compared with the EM properties for the subjects with normal breasts (BI-RADS category 1), yielded areas under the ROC curve ranging from 0.67 to 0.81. Pathologic correlations with mean vessel density, mean vessel area, and epithelium-to-stroma ratio suggest a biological origin of the EM image properties associated with disease.

Conclusion: Results from EM breast examinations provide statistical evidence of a mean increase in image contrast of 150%–200% between abnormal (benign and malignant) and normal breast tissue.

© RSNA, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.