HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text All Versions of this Article: 2463070989v1 246/3/742    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Earls, J. P. Articles by Londt, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Earls, J. P. Articles by Londt, J. H.

Prospectively Gated Transverse Coronary CT Angiography versus Retrospectively Gated Helical Technique: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose¹

¹ From the Fairfax Radiological Consultants P.C., 2722 Merrilee Dr, Suite 230, Fairfax, VA 22031 (J.P.E., E.L.B., B.A.U., C.A.C., J.L.L., R.S.J.); Applied Statistics Laboratory, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY (C.C.M.); and Applied Science Laboratory, GE Healthcare Technologies, Waukesha, Wis (J.H., J.H.L.). From the 2006 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received June 11, 2007; revision requested July 27; revision received August 25; final version accepted September 27. Address correspondence to J.P.E. (e-mail: jpearls{at}yahoo.com).

Purpose: To retrospectively compare image quality, radiation dose, and blood vessel assessability for coronary artery computed tomographic (CT) angiograms obtained with a prospectively gated transverse (PGT) CT technique and a retrospectively gated helical (RGH) CT technique.

Materials and Methods: This HIPAA-compliant study received a waiver for approval from the institutional review board, including one for informed consent. Coronary CT angiograms obtained with 64–detector row CT were retrospectively evaluated in 203 clinical patients. A routine RGH technique was evaluated in 82 consecutive patients (44 males, 38 females; mean age, 55.6 years). The PGT technique was then evaluated in 121 additional patients (71 males, 50 females; mean age, 56.7 years). All images were evaluated for image quality, estimated radiation dose, and coronary artery segment assessability. Differences in image quality score were evaluated by using a proportional odds logistic regression model, with main effects for three readers, two techniques, and four arteries.

Results: The mean effective dose for the group with the PGT technique was 2.8 mSv; this represents an 83% reduction as compared with that for the group with the RGH technique (mean, 18.4 mSv; P < .001). The image quality score for each of the arteries, as well as the overall combined score, was significantly greater for images obtained with PGT technique than for images obtained with RGH technique. The combined mean image quality score was 4.791 for images obtained with PGT technique versus 4.514 for images obtained with RGH technique (proportional odds model odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.7, 4.8). The percentage of assessable coronary artery segments was 98.6% (1196 of 1213) for images obtained with PGT technique versus 97.9% (1741 of 1778) for images obtained with RGH technique (P = .83).

Conclusion: PGT coronary CT angiography offers improved image quality and substantially reduced effective radiation dose compared with traditional RGH coronary CT angiography.

© RSNA, 2008

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Chander, M. Brenner, R. Lautamaki, C. Voicu, J. Merrill, and F. M. Bengel Comparison of Measures of Left Ventricular Function from Electrocardiographically Gated 82Rb PET with Contrast-Enhanced CT Ventriculography: A Hybrid PET/CT Analysis J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1643 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H Scheffel, H Alkadhi, S Leschka, A Plass, L Desbiolles, I Guber, T Krauss, J Gruenenfelder, M Genoni, T F Luescher, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance Heart, September 1, 2008; 94(9): 1132 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. P. Shuman, K. R. Branch, J. M. May, L. M. Mitsumori, D. W. Lockhart, T. J. Dubinsky, B. H. Warren, and J. H. Caldwell Prospective versus Retrospective ECG Gating for 64-Detector CT of the Coronary Arteries: Comparison of Image Quality and Patient Radiation Dose Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 431 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Kelly, D. Thickman, S. D. Abramson, P. R. Chen, S. F. Smazal, M. J. Fleishman, and S. C. Lingam Coronary CT Angiography Findings in Patients Without Coronary Calcification Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 50 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]