Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 7, 2008, 10.1148/radiol.2471070682
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2471070682v1
247/1/197    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cannie, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dymarkowski, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cannie, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dymarkowski, S.
(Radiology 2008;247:197-203.)
© RSNA, 2008


Obstetric Imaging

Fetal Body Volume at MR Imaging to Quantify Total Fetal Lung Volume: Normal Ranges1

Mieke M. Cannie, MD, Jacques C. Jani, MD, PhD, Filip Van Kerkhove, MD, Joke Meerschaert, MD, Frederik De Keyzer, MSc, Liesbeth Lewi, MD, Jan A. Deprest, MD, PhD, and Steven Dymarkowski, MD, PhD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (M.M.C., F.V.K., J.M., F.D.K., S.D.) and Obstetrics and Gynaecology (J.C.J., L.L., J.A.D.), University Hospital Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Received April 17, 2007; revision requested June 12; revision received July 18; accepted August 16; final version accepted September 28. J.C.J. supported by a doctoral grant from the European Commission via the Fifth Framework Programme (EuroTwin2Twin, QLG1-CT-2002-01632). Address correspondence to J.A.D. (e-mail: Jan.Deprest{at}uzleuven.ac.be).

Purpose: To prospectively determine normal ranges of total fetal lung volume (TFLV) based on fetal body volume (FBV) and to determine whether prediction of TFLV based on such ranges is independent of fetal biometric indexes.

Materials and Methods: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Clinical Studies; informed consent was obtained. Magnetic resonance imaging volumetric measurement of fetal lung, liver, and body was performed in 200 fetuses without abnormalities affecting these structures. FBV was assessed with planimetric measurements by using T2-weighted half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement at 16–40 weeks of gestation. TFLV was correlated to gestational age (GA), liver volume, and FBV. Observed-expected (O/E) ratio for TFLV was calculated by expressing the observed TFLV as a percentage of the expected mean TFLV for GA, liver volume, or FBV. Three groups of fetuses were defined on the basis of biometric percentiles for fetal weight obtained through ultrasonography: fetuses with weight at or below the 5th percentile, those with weight at or above the 95th percentile, and those with weight between these two percentiles (eutrophic). Median O/E ratios, based on GA and FBV, in fetuses with weight below the 5th percentile and in those with weight above the 95th percentile, were compared with median O/E ratio of eutrophic fetuses (Mann-Whitney U test).

Results: TFLV correlated best with FBV, according to the following cubic fit: TFLV = [(2.0 · 10–9) · FBV3] – [(1.19 · 10–5) · FBV2] + (0.0508 · FBV) – 1.79 (r2 = 0.85, P < .001). In 174 eutrophic fetuses, normal median O/E ratio based on GA was 99.1% (range, 31.2%–158.0%), which was higher than that in 11 fetuses with weight at or below the 5th percentile (46.2%; range, 15.7%–87.3%) (P < .01) and lower than that in 15 fetuses with weight at or above the 95th percentile (146.8%; range, 87.2%–204.2%) (P < .01). Normal median O/E ratio, based on FBV, was independent of biometric indexes irrespective of the percentile for fetal weight.

Conclusion: FBV correlated best with TFLV, irrespective of biometric variables.

© RSNA, 2008







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Radiological Society of North America.