Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 18, 2008, 10.1148/radiol.2472070691

(Radiology 2008;247:465.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2472070691v1
247/2/465    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gilsanz, V.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gilsanz, V.
© RSNA, 2008

Head and Neck Imaging

Reproducibility of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measurements in Young Adults1

Jaime Gonzalez, MS, John C. Wood, MD, Frederick J. Dorey, PhD, Tishya A. L. Wren, PhD, and Vicente Gilsanz, MD, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology (J.G., T.A.L.W., V.G.), Department of Cardiology (J.C.W.), Department of Pediatrics (F.J.D.), and Division of Orthopedic Surgery (T.A.L.W., V.G.), Children's Hospital Los Angeles, MS No. 81, 4650 Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90027. Received April 19, 2007; revision requested June 14; revision received July 3; accepted August 1; final version accepted October 31. Address correspondence to V.G. (e-mail: vgilsanz{at}chla.usc.edu).

Purpose: To prospectively compare the reproducibility of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurements obtained from the right and left carotid arteries in young adults by using ultrasonographic (US) images acquired at the maximum dimension, minimum dimension, and electrocardiographically (ECG)-triggered cardiac end diastole.

Materials and Methods: This study was HIPAA compliant and approved by the institutional review board; all participants provided informed consent. Medical history, anthropometric measurements, and blood pressure (BP) values were obtained from 50 men and 50 women aged 18–25 years. Images of the common carotid arteries were acquired from three independent complete cardiac cycles by using a 15L8-MHz US transducer. CIMT was measured on the images of each cycle that depicted the narrowest and widest vessel diameters, and at the R wave of the ECG. Measurements from the right and left carotid arteries were analyzed by using paired t tests; possible sex differences, by using unpaired t tests. Reproducibility was determined by using coefficients of variation and intraclass correlations (ICCs). Pearson correlations and multiple regression analyses were used to compare CIMT, body mass index (BMI), and BP.

Results: CIMT values were 7.2% and 7% greater in frames showing the narrowest lumen diameter and in R-wave ECG-triggered frames, respectively, than in those with the widest diameter. CIMT measurements were 2.2%–3.1% greater in the right carotid artery than in the left (P < .001) and were significantly related to BMI (r = 0.40, P < .001) and systolic BP (r = 0.34, P < .001). ICCs were stronger when assessments were obtained in three different cardiac cycles (0.92–0.98), rather than in one (0.79–0.91).

Conclusion: In healthy young adults, reproducibility of CIMT measurements is greatest when combining values from both carotid arteries and/or from the maximal and minimal arterial diameters.

© RSNA, 2008







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Radiological Society of North America.