<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org">
<title>Radiology recent issues</title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org</link>
<description>Radiology RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:eIssn>1527-1315</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Radiology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0033-8419</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/03A?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/323?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/326?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/328?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/337?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/342?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/348?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/366?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/378?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/390?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/390-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/391?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/391-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/392?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/398?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/406?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/414?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/424?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/431?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/438?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/447?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/458?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/466?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/476?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/485?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/492?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/504?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/511?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/518?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/531?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/540?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/550?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/561?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/571?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/579?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/590?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/599?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/606?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/615?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/625?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/632?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/643?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/655?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/662?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/670?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/680?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/693?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/695?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/699?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/701?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/702?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/703?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/704?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/704-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/03A?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/4?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/8?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/12?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/16?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/20?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/44?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/61?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/77?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/78?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/78-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/79?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/88?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/97?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/106?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/114?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/124?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/132?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/140?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/148?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/160?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/169?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/179?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/185?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/194?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/202?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/210?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/221?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/233?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/240?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/247?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/254?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/264?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/272?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/278?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/288?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/297?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/312?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/314?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/317?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/319?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/320?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/321?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/322?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/03A?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/595?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/597?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/602?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/605?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/608?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/613?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/617?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/632?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/649?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/649-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/650?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/651?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/658?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/669?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/679?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/687?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/696?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/706?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/717?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/726?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/733?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/738?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/747?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/754?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/762?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/771?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/779?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/788?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/797?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/808?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/818?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/826?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/836?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/841?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/847?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/854?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/862?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/871?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/880?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/887?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/896?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/903?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/905?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/910?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/912?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/913?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/914?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/915?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/917?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/917-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/15A?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/301?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/307?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/311?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/331?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/344?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/344-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/345?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/346?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/356?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/365?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/374?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/381?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/391?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/400?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/409?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/418?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/428?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/435?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/444?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/451?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/458?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/465?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/472?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/482?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/490?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/499?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/507?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/516?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/528?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/535?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/543?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/550?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/558?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/567?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/574?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/582?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/585?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/589?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/591?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/592?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/593?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/2/594?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Radiology</title>
<url>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/03A?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[This Month in Radiology] This Month in Radiology]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/03A?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482200803</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[This Month in Radiology] This Month in Radiology]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>4A</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>03A</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>This Month in Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/323?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Science to Practice] Can Tumor Growth Be Further Inhibited by Combining Drugs Such as Bortezomib with Image-guided Interventional Oncologic Procedures?]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/323?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goldberg, S. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482080719</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Science to Practice] Can Tumor Growth Be Further Inhibited by Combining Drugs Such as Bortezomib with Image-guided Interventional Oncologic Procedures?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>325</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>323</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Science to Practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/326?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Special Communications] Bruce J. Hillman, MD: 2007 RSNA Outstanding Researcher]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/326?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jost, R. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482082520</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Special Communications] Bruce J. Hillman, MD: 2007 RSNA Outstanding Researcher]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>327</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>326</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Communications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/328?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Perspectives] Imaging as a Quantitative Science]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/328?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sullivan, D. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482080242</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Perspectives] Imaging as a Quantitative Science]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>332</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>328</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Perspectives</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/333?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Controversies] Radiologists: Physicians or Expert Image Interpreters?]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/333?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maynard, C. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482080375</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Controversies] Radiologists: Physicians or Expert Image Interpreters?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>336</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>333</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/337?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Controversies] Off-site Teleradiology: The Pros]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/337?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bradley, W. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482080569</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Controversies] Off-site Teleradiology: The Pros]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>341</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>337</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Controversies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/342?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorial] Bioengineering and Imaging Research Opportunities Workshop V: Summary of Findings on Imaging and Characterizing Structure and Function in Native and Engineered Tissues]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/342?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hendee, W. R., Cleary, K., Ehman, R. L., Fullerton, G. D., Grundfest, W. S., Haller, J., Kelley, C. A., Meyer, A. E., Murphy, R. F., Phillips, W., Torchilin, V. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482080456</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorial] Bioengineering and Imaging Research Opportunities Workshop V: Summary of Findings on Imaging and Characterizing Structure and Function in Native and Engineered Tissues]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>347</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>342</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/348?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Review] Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and the Role of Imaging]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/348?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>The use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the treatment of children afflicted with many potentially fatal malignant and nonmalignant diseases is well recognized. Although outcomes continue to improve and the utility of HSCT is increasing, HSCT remains a complicated process necessitating support from many medical disciplines, including radiology. Importantly, children who undergo HSCT are at risk for the development of specific complications that are linked to the timeline of transplantation, as well as to the relationship between the underlying diagnoses, severe immune deficiency, cytoreductive regimen, and graft-versus-host reactions. An understanding of the complex interplay of the immune status, therapeutic regimen, and disease allows increased diagnostic accuracy. Successful treatment of these high-risk children requires that radiologists who are involved with their care be familiar with broad concepts, as well as with specific problems that frequently occur following HSCT. In this article, the clinical aspects of pediatric HSCT are summarized, including common complications, and imaging features of these complications are described.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hollingsworth, C. L., Frush, D. P., Kurtzburg, J., Prasad, V. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482070988</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Review] Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and the Role of Imaging]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>365</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>348</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/366?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[How I Do It] Cardiac Multidetector CT: Technical and Diagnostic Evaluation with Evidence-based Practice Techniques]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/366?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>The "bottom-up" model of evidence-based practice (EBP) emphasizes the principles of integrating best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. It is derived from multidisciplinary sources, including clinical medicine, epidemiology, and adult learning theory, and has been applied to many medical disciplines, including radiology. Central to its implementation in everyday busy radiology practice is its emphasis on accurate, rapid modern informatics/internet to get the best current research evidence into everyday practice. In this article, the authors apply the principles of EBP to the topic of cardiac computed tomography. EBP is ideally suited to asking, searching, appraising, applying, and evaluating the literature on this rapidly developing technology.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heffernan, E. J., Dodd, J. D., Malone, D. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482070356</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[How I Do It] Cardiac Multidetector CT: Technical and Diagnostic Evaluation with Evidence-based Practice Techniques]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>377</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>366</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>How I Do It</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/378?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Review for Residents] Radiographic Evaluation of Arthritis: Inflammatory Conditions]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/378?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>In the presence of joint space narrowing, it is important to differentiate inflammatory from degenerative conditions. Joint inflammation is characterized by bone erosions, osteopenia, soft-tissue swelling, and uniform joint space loss. Inflammation of a single joint should raise concern for infection. Multiple joint inflammation in a proximal distribution in the hands or feet without bone proliferation suggests rheumatoid arthritis. Multiple joint inflammation in a distal distribution in the hands or feet with bone proliferation suggests a seronegative spondyloarthropathy, such as psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacobson, J. A., Girish, G., Jiang, Y., Resnick, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482062110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Review for Residents] Radiographic Evaluation of Arthritis: Inflammatory Conditions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>389</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>378</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review for Residents</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/390?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Book Reviews] Urogenital Ultrasound: A Text Atlas, 2nd ed]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/390?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482082516</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Book Reviews] Urogenital Ultrasound: A Text Atlas, 2nd ed]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>390</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>390</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/390-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Book Reviews] CT Urography: An Atlas]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/390-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482082517</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Book Reviews] CT Urography: An Atlas]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>391</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>390</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/391?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Book Reviews] Atlas of Human Anatomy, 4th ed]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/391?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482082518</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Book Reviews] Atlas of Human Anatomy, 4th ed]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>391</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>391</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/391-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Book Reviews] Pocket Atlas of Sectional Anatomy: Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol 3: Spine, Extremities, Joints, 3rd ed]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/391-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482082519</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Book Reviews] Pocket Atlas of Sectional Anatomy: Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol 3: Spine, Extremities, Joints, 3rd ed]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>391</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>391</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/392?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Imaging] Breast US Computer-aided Diagnosis Workstation: Performance with a Large Clinical Diagnostic Population]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/392?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To evaluate the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) workstation in classifying cancer in a realistic data set representative of a clinical diagnostic breast ultrasonography (US) practice.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> The database consisted of consecutive diagnostic breast US scans collected with informed consent with a protocol approved by the institutional review board and compliant with the HIPAA. Images from 508 patients with a total of 1046 distinct abnormalities were used. One hundred one patients had breast cancer. Results both for patients in whom the lesion abnormality was proved with either biopsy or aspiration (<I>n</I> = 183) and for all patients irrespective of biopsy status (<I>n</I> = 508) are presented. The ability of the CAD workstation to help differentiate malignancies from benign lesions was evaluated with a leave-one-out-by-case analysis. The clinical specificity of the radiologists for this dataset was determined according to the biopsy rate and outcome.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> In the task of differentiating cancer from all other lesions sent to biopsy, the CAD workstation obtained an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.88, with 100% sensitivity at 26% specificity (157 cancers and 362 lesions total). The radiologists' specificity at 100% sensitivity for this set was zero. When analyzing all lesions irrespective of biopsy status, which is more representative of actual clinical practice, the CAD scheme obtained an AUC of 0.90 and 100% sensitivity at 30% specificity (157 cancers and 1046 lesions total). The radiologists' specificity at 100% sensitivity for this set was 77%.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Current levels of computer performance warrant a clinical evaluation of the potential of US CAD to aid radiologists in lesion work-up recommendations.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drukker, K., Gruszauskas, N. P., Sennett, C. A., Giger, M. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071778</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Imaging] Breast US Computer-aided Diagnosis Workstation: Performance with a Large Clinical Diagnostic Population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>397</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>392</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/398?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Imaging] Detecting Nonpalpable Recurrent Breast Cancer: The Role of Routine Mammographic Screening of Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Reconstructions]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/398?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To perform a retrospective cohort study to determine the rates of recall and cancer detection and then to develop a decision analytic model to evaluate the effectiveness of routine screening of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstructions.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> This study was approved by the institutional review board, and the methods comply with HIPAA regulations. A retrospective search of the institutional mammographic results database was done to identify bilateral screening mammographic examinations obtained from January 1, 1999, through July 15, 2005. The search included the term <I>TRAM</I>; the recall and cancer detetion rates were then detected. Subsequently, a decision analytic model was constructed to evaluate a hypothetical cohort of women with TRAM flap reconstructions.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Of 554 mammograms (265 TRAM flap reconstructions), 546 (98.6%) had negative results (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 1 or 2). Eight (1.4%) had positive test results (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 0, 3, 4, or 5). All suspicious lesions underwent biopsy and had benign pathologic results. No interval breast cancers were identified. The detection rate for nonpalpable recurrent breast cancer was 0% (exact 95% confidence interval: 0.0%, 1.4%). According to decision analysis, screening would help detect an estimated 12 additional recurrent cancers per 1000 women screened, providing an additional 1.6 days of life expectancy for the screened cohort. Under base-case conditions, screening of TRAM flap reconstructions is less effective than screening asymptomatic women in their 40s. Sensitivity analysis revealed that a benefit equivalent to that of screening asymptomatic women in their 40s was achievable under conditions related to estimates of screening effectiveness and cancer detection rate.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Routine screening mammography of TRAM flap reconstructions has a very low detection rate for nonpalpable recurrent breast cancer. Decision analysis indicates that screening such women is less effective than screening asymptomatic women in their 40s for primary breast cancer.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, J. M., Georgian-Smith, D., Gazelle, G. S., Halpern, E. F., Rafferty, E. A., Moore, R. H., Yeh, E. D., D'Alessandro, H. A., Hitt, R. A., Kopans, D. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071635</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Imaging] Detecting Nonpalpable Recurrent Breast Cancer: The Role of Routine Mammographic Screening of Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Reconstructions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>405</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>398</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/406?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Breast Imaging] US-guided 14-gauge Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: Results of a Validation Study in 1352 Cases]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/406?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To retrospectively determine the false-negative rate and the underestimation rate of ultrasonography (US)-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy (CNB) in nonpalpable lesions, with validation at surgical excision histologic examination and with stability during clinical and imaging follow-up.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Informed consent was waived by the institutional review board for this retrospective review of 1352 cases. In 1061 cases, patients underwent surgical excision of lesions visible at US subsequent to US-guided 14-gauge CNB. Follow-up of another 291 benign lesions at US-guided 14-gauge CNB histologic examination showed stability during clinical and imaging follow-up for at least 2 years. US and histologic findings were reviewed and compared for agreement. A false-negative finding was defined as pathologically proved cancer for which biopsy results were benign. The false-negative rate was defined as the proportion of all breast cancers with a diagnosis of benign disease at US-guided 14-gauge CNB. The underestimation rate was defined as an upgrade of a high-risk lesion at US-guided 14-gauge CNB to malignancy at surgery.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> US 14-gauge CNB yielded 671 (63.2%) malignant, 86 (8.1%) high-risk, and 304 (28.7%) benign lesions. Each of the 291 benign lesions without surgery remained stable during follow-up. The agreement of US-guided 14-gauge CNB results, surgical excision findings, and follow-up results was 95.8% ( = 0.93). False-negative findings were encountered in 11 (0.8%) of 1352 cases, and the false-negative rate was 1.6% (11 of 671 malignancies). All false-negative findings were prospectively identified owing to discordance between imaging results and US-guided 14-gauge CNB histologic findings. The underestimation rate was 31.4%.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> US-guided 14-gauge CNB is an alternative to surgical excision for assessing nonpalpable breast lesions.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schueller, G., Jaromi, S., Ponhold, L., Fuchsjaeger, M., Memarsadeghi, M., Rudas, M., Weber, M., Liberman, L., Helbich, T. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071994</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Breast Imaging] US-guided 14-gauge Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: Results of a Validation Study in 1352 Cases]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>413</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>406</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Breast Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/414?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Functionally Relevant Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison of 64-Section CT Angiography with Myocardial Perfusion SPECT]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/414?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To prospectively determine the accuracy of 64-section computed tomographic (CT) angiography for the depiction of coronary artery disease (CAD) that induces perfusion defects at myocardial perfusion imaging with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), by using myocardial perfusion imaging as the reference standard.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> All patients gave written informed consent after the study details, including radiation exposure, were explained. The study protocol was approved by the local institutional review board. In patients referred for elective conventional coronary angiography, an additional 64-section CT angiography study and a myocardial perfusion imaging study (1-day adenosine stress-rest protocol) with technetium 99m&ndash;tetrofosmin SPECT were performed before conventional angiography. Coronary artery diameter narrowing of 50% or greater at CT angiography was defined as stenosis and was compared with the myocardial perfusion imaging findings. Quantitative coronary angiography served as a reference standard for CT angiography.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> A total of 1093 coronary segments in 310 coronary arteries in 78 patients (mean age, 65 years &plusmn; 9 [standard deviation]; 35 women) were analyzed. CT angiography revealed stenoses in 137 segments (13%) corresponding to 91 arteries (29%) in 46 patients (59%). SPECT revealed 14 reversible, 13 fixed, and six partially reversible defects in 31 patients (40%). Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values, respectively, of CT angiography in the detection of reversible myocardial perfusion imaging defects were 95%, 53%, 94%, and 58% on a per-patient basis and 95%, 75%, 96%, and 72% on a per-artery basis. Agreement between CT and conventional angiography was very good (96% and  = 0.92 for patient-based analysis, 93% and  = 0.84 for vessel-based analysis).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Sixty-four&ndash;section CT angiography can help rule out hemodynamically relevant CAD in patients with intermediate to high pretest likelihood, although an abnormal CT angiography study is a poor predictor of ischemia.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaemperli, O., Schepis, T., Valenta, I., Koepfli, P., Husmann, L., Scheffel, H., Leschka, S., Eberli, F. R., Luscher, T. F., Alkadhi, H., Kaufmann, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071307</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Functionally Relevant Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison of 64-Section CT Angiography with Myocardial Perfusion SPECT]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>423</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>414</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cardiac Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/424?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Prospective versus Retrospective ECG-gated 64-Detector Coronary CT Angiography: Assessment of Image Quality, Stenosis, and Radiation Dose]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/424?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To show that prospective electrocardiographically (ECG)-triggered coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography (hereafter, prospective CT angiography) is at least as effective as retrospective ECG-gated coronary CT angiography (hereafter, retrospective CT angiography).</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Institutional review committee approval and informed consent were obtained. Sixty patients with heart rates of less than 75 beats per minute who were referred for coronary CT angiography were enrolled. Both prospective and retrospective CT angiography were performed with a 64-detector scanner. Data acquisition times were recorded. Two independent cardiac radiologists evaluated subjective image quality (1, excellent; 4, poor) and severity of stenosis (0% occlusion, 1%&ndash;49% occlusion, 50%&ndash;75% occlusion, and &gt;75% occlusion) with the 17-segment American Heart Association classification model. Discrepancies were settled by consensus. Effective radiation doses of prospective and retrospective CT angiography were calculated with volume CT dose index. Data regarding acquisition time and radiation exposure for prospective and retrospective CT angiography were compared. The Student <I>t</I> test was performed, and  statistics were calculated.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Mean data acquisition time of prospective CT angiography was shorter than that of retrospective CT angiography (5.6 seconds &plusmn; 1.1 [standard deviation] vs 6.7 seconds &plusmn; 1.1, respectively; <I>P</I> &lt; .01). Consensus-determined image quality in coronary artery branches was similar between prospective CT angiography and retrospective CT angiography (1.15 vs 1.13, respectively; <I>P</I> = .992). Excellent agreement between prospective CT angiography and retrospective CT angiography was observed in the detection of significant (&ge;50% occlusion) coronary artery stenoses per segment ( = 0.882) and in the grading of stenoses per patient ( = 0.829). Calculated effective dose with prospective CT angiography was 79% lower than that with retrospective CT angiography (4.1 mSv &plusmn; 1.8 vs 20.0 mSv &plusmn; 3.5, respectively; <I>P</I> &lt; .001).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Prospective CT angiography can reduce radiation dose below that of retrospective CT angiography with dose modulation, while maintaining image quality and the ability to assess luminal obstructions in patients with heart rates of less than 75 beats per minute.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hirai, N., Horiguchi, J., Fujioka, C., Kiguchi, M., Yamamoto, H., Matsuura, N., Kitagawa, T., Teragawa, H., Kohno, N., Ito, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071804</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Prospective versus Retrospective ECG-gated 64-Detector Coronary CT Angiography: Assessment of Image Quality, Stenosis, and Radiation Dose]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>430</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>424</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cardiac Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/431?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Prospective versus Retrospective ECG Gating for 64-Detector CT of the Coronary Arteries: Comparison of Image Quality and Patient Radiation Dose]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/431?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To compare image quality and patient radiation dose in a group of patients who underwent 64-detector computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography performed with prospective electrocardiographic (ECG) gating with image quality and radiation dose in a group of patients matched for clinical features who underwent 64-detector CT coronary angiography performed with retrospective ECG gating.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study, and the informed consent requirement was waived due to the retrospective study design. Two independent reviewers separately scored coronary artery segment image quality and overall image quality for 100 cardiac CT studies (50 in each group). Interobserver variability was calculated. Patient radiation dose for the actual examination z-axis length was recorded, and a normalized dose was calculated for a 12-cm z-axis length of a typical heart.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> The two groups matched well for clinical characteristics and CT parameters. There was good agreement for coronary artery segment image quality scores between the independent reviewers ( = 0.72). Of the 1253 coronary artery segments scored, the number of coronary artery segments that could not be evaluated in each group was similar (1.1% [seven of 614] in the prospective group vs 1.5% [10 of 647] in the retrospective group, <I>P</I> = .53). Image quality scores were not significantly different when matched for chest cross-sectional area (<I>P</I> &gt; .05). Mean patient radiation dose was 77% lower for prospective gating (4.2 mSv) than for retrospective gating (18.1 mSv) (<I>P</I> &lt; .01).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Use of 64-detector CT coronary angiography performed with prospective ECG gating has similar subjective image quality scores but 77% lower patient radiation dose when compared with use of retrospective ECG gating.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shuman, W. P., Branch, K. R., May, J. M., Mitsumori, L. M., Lockhart, D. W., Dubinsky, T. J., Warren, B. H., Caldwell, J. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482072192</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Prospective versus Retrospective ECG Gating for 64-Detector CT of the Coronary Arteries: Comparison of Image Quality and Patient Radiation Dose]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>437</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>431</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cardiac Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/438?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Evaluation of a "Triple Rule-Out" Coronary CT Angiography Protocol: Use of 64-Section CT in Low-to-Moderate Risk Emergency Department Patients Suspected of Having Acute Coronary Syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/438?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To determine whether coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography "triple rule-out" evaluation of emergency department (ED) patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can help identify a subset of patients who can be discharged without adverse clinical outcomes within 30 days.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> This protocol was approved by the university institutional review board. Each patient provided written informed consent prior to inclusion. Coronary CT angiography was performed in 201 consecutive low-to-moderate risk ACS patients. A triple rule-out protocol was used to evaluate for coronary disease, pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection, and other thoracic disease. Four patients were excluded because of technical problems. The remaining subjects underwent a 30-day follow-up.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> A disease process other than coronary atherosclerosis that explained the presenting symptoms was diagnosed in 22 (11%) of 197 patients. Clinically important noncoronary diagnoses that did not explain patient symptoms were identified in 27 (14%) of 197 additional patients. With respect to coronary artery disease, 10 patients had severe disease (&gt;70% stenosis), 12 had moderate disease (50%&ndash;70% stenosis), 46 had mild disease (up to 50% stenosis), and 129 had no disease. No further diagnostic testing was performed in 133 (76%) of 175 of patients with no to mild coronary disease. At 30-day follow-up, the negative predictive value of coronary CT angiography with no more than mild disease was 99.4%. There were no adverse outcomes at 30 days.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Triple rule-out coronary CT angiography evaluation of low-to-moderate risk ACS patients presenting to the ED provided a noncoronary diagnosis that explained the presenting complaint in 11% of patients, suggested the presence of significant moderate-to-severe coronary disease in 11% (22 of 197) of patients, and precluded additional diagnostic cardiac testing in the majority of patients with no adverse outcomes at 30-day follow-up.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Takakuwa, K. M., Halpern, E. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482072169</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Evaluation of a "Triple Rule-Out" Coronary CT Angiography Protocol: Use of 64-Section CT in Low-to-Moderate Risk Emergency Department Patients Suspected of Having Acute Coronary Syndrome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>446</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>438</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cardiac Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/447?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Bachmann Bundle and Its Arterial Supply: Imaging with Multidetector CT--Implications for Interatrial Conduction Abnormalities and Arrhythmias]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/447?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To retrospectively investigate anatomy of Bachmann bundle (BB) and its vascular supply at 64-section multidetector computed tomography (CT) in healthy patients and patients with abnormalities.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study and waived informed consent. Clinical histories, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and coronary 64-section multidetector CT angiograms in 317 patients were reviewed (healthy group, 164; group with abnormalities, 153). Among patients with abnormalities, 68 had atrial fibrillation (AF) or interatrial conduction block (IAB) (P wave duration, &ge;120 msec), 46 had severe coronary artery disease (CAD) (&ge;70% stenosis of coronary artery giving rise to sinuatrial node [SAN] artery), and 39 had severe CAD and an abnormal ECG (AF or IAB). Length, anteroposterior and superoinferior diameters, attenuation, and vascular supply of BB were studied. Student <I>t</I> test for continuous variables and contingency tables for categorical variables were used.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> BB was visualized, to greater degree, in the healthy group (90.2% vs 73.9% for group with abnormalities, <I>P</I> &lt; .001). Visualization of BB was similar among subgroups with abnormalities: 71.7% in patients with severe CAD, 73.5% in patients with abnormal ECG, and 76.9% in patients with severe CAD and abnormal ECG. BB measurements were similar for both groups. Patients with nonvisualized BB displayed lower overall mean attenuation in the region, with &ndash;30.6 HU &plusmn; 33.4 (standard deviation), but mean attenuation in healthy patients was 51.3 HU &plusmn; 59.9 (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). This finding suggests fatty infiltration. BB and BB region were mainly supplied by the right SAN artery (55.5%), followed by the left SAN artery (39.6%) and both SAN arteries (4.9%). In the group with abnormalities, there was a significant difference for SAN artery nonvisualization between those with and without identifiable BB (<I>P</I> = .001).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> BB and its vascular supply can easily be demarcated on cardiac CT images. BB was visualized less in patients with severe CAD and abnormal ECG, a finding that suggests that disease of BB fibers may play a role in development of atrial arrhythmias.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saremi, F., Channual, S., Krishnan, S., Gurudevan, S. V., Narula, J., Abolhoda, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071908</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Bachmann Bundle and Its Arterial Supply: Imaging with Multidetector CT--Implications for Interatrial Conduction Abnormalities and Arrhythmias]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>457</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>447</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cardiac Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/458?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Isovolumic Cardiac Contraction on High-Temporal-Resolution Cine MR Images: Study in Heart Failure Patients and Healthy Volunteers]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/458?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To prospectively implement high-temporal-resolution cine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol to compare cardiac preejection contraction (PEC) and prefilling relaxation (PFR) times between heart failure (HF) patients and healthy control subjects and to assess accuracy of PEC times to stratify HF patients, with ejection fraction (EF) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) symptom class as reference standards.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Following institutional review board approval of this HIPAA-compliant study and written informed consent, 18 healthy volunteers (10 women, eight men; mean age, 43 years &plusmn; 14 [standard deviation]) and 18 HF patients (five women, 13 men; mean age, 49.8 years &plusmn; 3) were imaged (breath-hold true fast imaging with steady-state precession, with temporal resolution of 5.6 msec at 1.5 T). By using left ventricular (LV) outflow tract acquisition, PEC phase was defined as time at QRS trigger to immediately before aortic valve opening. PFR was defined as time from initial aortic valve closure to immediately before mitral valve opening. Group means were compared (unpaired Student <I>t</I> test). Accuracy of PEC parameters in stratifying participants with severe systolic HF on the basis of EF and NYHA symptom class was assessed (receiver operating characteristic curve analysis).</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Compared with control subjects, HF patients had prolonged mean PEC time (40.4 msec &plusmn; 11.8 vs 91.3 msec &plusmn; 26, <I>P</I> &lt; .001) and mean PFR time (68.3 msec &plusmn; 26.8 vs 103.7 msec &plusmn; 41.8, <I>P</I> &lt; .01). PEC time correlated with global EF (<I>r</I> = &ndash;0.73, <I>P</I> &lt; .001) and LV mass (<I>r</I> = 0.69, <I>P</I> &lt; .001). For identification of patients with severe LV systolic dysfunction (EF &le; 35%), PEC time was highly accurate (area under the curve [AUC], 0.900 [<I>P</I> &lt; .001]). For identification of patients with moderate-to-severe HF symptoms (NYHA class &gt; 2), PEC time had good accuracy (AUC, 0.875 [<I>P</I> &lt; .001]).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> It is feasible to assess isovolumic PEC and PFR phases of the cardiac cycle with high-frame-rate cine MR images, and PEC time is a surrogate measure of moderate-to-severe systolic HF.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dinh, H. V., Alvergue, J., Sayre, J., Child, J. S., Deshpande, V. S., Laub, G., Finn, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Isovolumic Cardiac Contraction on High-Temporal-Resolution Cine MR Images: Study in Heart Failure Patients and Healthy Volunteers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>465</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>458</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cardiac Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/466?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Comprehensive Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Defects, Regional Wall Motion, and Left Ventricular Function by Using 64-Section Multidetector CT]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/466?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To evaluate the accuracy of 64-section multidetector computed tomography (CT) for the assessment of perfusion defects (PDs), regional wall motion (RWM), and global left ventricular (LV) function.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> All myocardial infarction (MI) patients signed informed consent. The IRB approved the study and it was HIPAA-compliant. Cardiac multidetector CT was performed in 102 patients (34 with recent acute MI and 68 without). Multidetector CT images were analyzed for myocardial PD, RWM abnormalities, and LV function. Global LV function and RWM were compared with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) by using multidetector CT. PD was detected by using multidetector CT and was correlated with cardiac biomarkers and single photon emission CT (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging. Multidetector CT diagnosis of acute MI was made on the basis of matching the presence of PD with RWM abnormalities compared with clinical evaluation.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Correlation between multidetector CT and TTE for global function (<I>r</I> = 0.68) and RWM ( = 0.79) was good. The size of PD on multidetector CT had a moderate correlation against SPECT (<I>r</I> = 0.48, &ndash;7% &plusmn; 9). There was good to excellent correlation between cardiac biomarkers and the percentage infarct size by using multidetector CT (<I>r</I> = 0.82 for creatinine phosphokinase, <I>r</I> = 0.76 for creatinine phosphokinase of the muscle band, and <I>r</I> = 0.75 for troponin). For detection of acute MI in patients, multidetector CT sensitivity was 94% (32 of 34) and specificity was 97% (66 of 68). Multidetector CT had an excellent interobserver reliability for ejection fraction quantification (<I>r</I> = 0.83), as compared with TTE (<I>r</I> = 0.68).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Patients with acute MI can be identified by using multidetector CT on the basis of RWM abnormalities and PD.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
<P>Supplemental material: <I><INTER-REF LOCATOR="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/248/2/466/DC1" LOCATOR-TYPE="URL">http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/248/2/466/DC1</INTER-REF></I></P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cury, R. C., Nieman, K., Shapiro, M. D., Butler, J., Nomura, C. H., Ferencik, M., Hoffmann, U., Abbara, S., Jassal, D. S., Yasuda, T., Gold, H. K., Jang, I.-K., Brady, T. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071478</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Cardiac Imaging] Comprehensive Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Defects, Regional Wall Motion, and Left Ventricular Function by Using 64-Section Multidetector CT]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>475</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>466</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cardiac Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/476?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Computer Applications] Lossy 3D JPEG2000 Compression of Abdominal CT Images in Patients with Acute Abdominal Complaints: Effect of Compression Ratio on Diagnostic Confidence and Accuracy]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/476?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To retrospectively assess the effect of lossy three-dimensional (3D) Joint Photographic Experts Group 2000 (JPEG2000) compression on diagnostic confidence and diagnostic accuracy at emergency abdominal computed tomography (CT).</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> In this institutional review board&ndash;approved study, transverse images from 104 consecutive multidetector CT examinations (section thickness, 3 mm; reconstruction interval, 2 mm) in patients with acute abdominal complaints were subjected to lossy 3D JPEG2000 compression by using three compression ratios (10:1, 12.5:1, and 15:1, with reference to 384 kB [12 bits] as original image size). Three radiologists independently read the original and compressed CT studies. Patient order and compression ratios were randomized, and readers were blinded to that information. For each organ, the presence of compression artifacts, the diagnosis, the confidence in the diagnosis according to a five-point scale, and the confidence about negative findings were noted. All diagnoses were compared with a standard of reference constructed by an abdominal CT expert by using the original images, surgical reports, and patient follow-up data. Logistic regressions, the Friedman test, and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Primary diagnoses were correct in 91.3% (463 of 507), 90.5% (459 of 507), 89.0% (451 of 507) and 90.1% (457 of 507) of the total number of primary diagnoses at 1:1, 1:10, 1:12.5 and 15:1, respectively. These values did not vary significantly (<I>P</I> = .456) with compression ratios. The radiologists' mean confidence about the primary diagnoses was also almost identical at different compression ratios (4.83, 4.87, 4.77, and 4.84 at 1:1, 1:10, 1:12.5 and 15:1, respectively). However, the radiologists' mean confidence about negative findings in the liver was reduced in 50.3% (157 of 312) of studies at 15:1.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Diagnostic accuracy was not impaired at compression ratios up to 15:1. However, because of the significant reduction of the confidence about negative findings at 15:1, compression ratios no higher than 12.5:1 are recommended.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ringl, H., Schernthaner, R., Sala, E., El-Rabadi, K., Weber, M., Schima, W., Herold, C. J., Dixon, A. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071586</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Computer Applications] Lossy 3D JPEG2000 Compression of Abdominal CT Images in Patients with Acute Abdominal Complaints: Effect of Compression Ratio on Diagnostic Confidence and Accuracy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>484</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>476</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Computer Applications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/485?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Experimental Studies] Pulsed High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Enhances Apoptosis and Growth Inhibition of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Xenografts with Proteasome Inhibitor Bortezomib]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/485?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To investigate whether combining pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with the chemotherapeutic drug bortezomib could improve antitumor activity against murine squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) tumors.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> All experiments were conducted with animal care and use committee approval. Murine SCC cells were implanted subcutaneously in C3H mice. When tumors reached 100 mm<SUP>3</SUP>, mice were randomized to one of three groups for twice weekly intraperitoneal injections of 1.5 mg of bortezomib per kilogram of body weight, a proteasome inhibitor (<I>n</I> = 10); 1.0 mg/kg bortezomib (<I>n</I> = 11); or a control vehicle (<I>n</I> = 12). Within each group, half of the mice received pulsed HIFU exposure to their tumors immediately prior to each injection. The time for tumors to reach 650 mm<SUP>3</SUP> was compared among groups. Additional tumors were stained with terminal deoxynucledotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling and CD31 to assess apoptotic index and blood vessel density, respectively.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Tumors in the control group, pulsed HIFU and control group, and 1.0 mg/kg of bortezomib alone group reached the size end point in 5.2 days &plusmn; 0.8 (standard deviation), 5.3 days &plusmn; 0.8, and 5.6 days &plusmn; 1.1, respectively. However, pulsed HIFU and 1.0 mg/kg bortezomib increased the time to end point to 9.8 days &plusmn; 2.9 (<I>P</I> &lt; .02), not significantly different from the 8.8 days &plusmn; 2.1 in tumors treated with 1.5 mg/kg bortezomib alone (<I>P</I> &gt; .05). Combination therapy was also associated with a significantly higher apoptotic index (<I>P</I> &lt; .05).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Treatment of tumors with pulsed HIFU lowered the threshold level for efficacy of bortezomib, resulting in significant tumor cytotoxicity and growth inhibition at lower dose levels.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poff, J. A., Allen, C. T., Traughber, B., Colunga, A., Xie, J., Chen, Z., Wood, B. J., Van Waes, C., Li, K. C. P., Frenkel, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071674</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Experimental Studies] Pulsed High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Enhances Apoptosis and Growth Inhibition of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Xenografts with Proteasome Inhibitor Bortezomib]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>491</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>485</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Experimental Studies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/492?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Experimental Studies] Effects of Spatial Resolution and Tube Current on Computer-aided Detection of Polyps on CT Colonographic Images: Phantom Study]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/492?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To prospectively evaluate the effects of z-axis spatial resolution and tube current on the sensitivity of a commercially available computed tomographic (CT) colonography computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for polyp detection by using pig colon phantoms.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Ninety-six polyps were created and analyzed in 14 pig colon phantoms. CT colonography was performed by using a 16-detector CT scanner at 0.75-mm collimation; 10, 50, 100, and 160 mAs; and a pitch of 1.5. At each milliampere-second setting, the CT images were reconstructed with a section thickness (ST) of 1.5 mm and a reconstruction increment (RI) of 1.3 mm. To evaluate the effect of z-axis spatial resolution, CT images were also reconstructed at 100 mAs with various SI and RI combinations (respectively: 1.0 and 0.7 mm, 3.0 and 2.0 mm, 3.0 and 3.0 mm, 5.0 and 5.0 mm). The phantom data were then analyzed by using a CAD program. CAD performance with different CT parameters was calculated and compared in terms of per-polyp sensitivity and number of false-positive (FP) findings per data set.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> At a constant tube current of 100 mAs, the polyp detection rate was significantly higher in data sets obtained with SI and RI combinations of 1.0 and 0.7 mm, respectively (81% [78/96]), and 1.5 and 1.3 mm, respectively (75% [72/96]), than in those obtained with the three thicker ST-RI settings (27% [26/96] to 64% [61/96]) (<I>P</I> &lt; .01). A similar trend was observed, regardless of polyp size or morphology. However, the number of FP findings at the 1.0 mm and 0.7 mm setting (8.9 per phantom) was also significantly greater than that at the thicker ST-RI settings (4.0&ndash;6.1 per phantom) (<I>P</I> &lt; .05). At a constant z-axis spatial resolution (1.5-mm ST, 1.3-mm RI), CAD polyp detection rate and number of FP findings per phantom remained nearly constant&mdash;close to 78% (75/96) and 6.1, respectively&mdash;at various tube current settings.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> CAD performance in polyp detection at CT colonography is highly dependent on z-axis spatial resolution. However, tube current is not an influencing factor in CAD performance at a given z-axis spatial resolution.</P>
<P>Supplemental material: <I><INTER-REF LOCATOR="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2482071025/DC1" LOCATOR-TYPE="URL">http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2482071025/DC1</INTER-REF></I></P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, S. H., Lee, J. M., Shin, C.-I., Kim, H. C., Lee, J.-G., Kim, J. H., Choi, J. Y., Eun, H. W., Han, J. K., Lee, J. Y., Choi, B. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071025</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Experimental Studies] Effects of Spatial Resolution and Tube Current on Computer-aided Detection of Polyps on CT Colonographic Images: Phantom Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>503</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>492</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Experimental Studies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/504?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery for Morbid Obesity: Evaluation of Leak into Excluded Stomach with Upper Gastrointestinal Examination]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/504?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To retrospectively evaluate the imaging features at upper gastrointestinal (GI) examination of leak into the excluded part of the stomach after the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure and to determine the associated complications and consequences of acute versus delayed leak development.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study; the need for informed consent was waived. Database review revealed 1655 upper GI studies performed over 6 years in 1282 patients after an RYGB procedure. Leak into the excluded stomach was diagnosed in 48 patients (39 women, nine men; age range, 29&ndash;62 years; mean age, 46 years); these patients formed our study group. Studies were analyzed by two radiologists in consensus for extent and pattern of leak into the excluded stomach and the presence of associated complications of extraluminal leak or fistula, obstruction, and acute distention of the excluded stomach. Chart review was performed to determine clinical course, treatment, associated complications, and outcome. Patients were divided into two categories on the basis of acute versus delayed development of leak into the excluded stomach. Acute leak into the excluded stomach was diagnosed within 2 months of surgery. Delayed leak occurred more than 2 months after surgery.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Leak into the excluded stomach occurred in the acute postoperative period (within 2 months) in 25 of the 48 patients (52%) and was associated with extraluminal leak in 22 of those 25 patients (88%). Acute leak into the excluded stomach healed in seven of the 25 patients (28%). Delayed postoperative leak into the excluded stomach occurred in 23 of the 48 patients (48%) and resulted in failed weight loss in 14 of those 23 patients (61%). Fourteen of the 48 patients (29%) underwent surgical revision for leak into the excluded stomach.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Leak into the excluded stomach was identified on upper GI studies in 48 of 1282 patients (3.7%) after RYGB for morbid obesity. Acute leak into the excluded stomach may heal spontaneously; however, remote postoperative leak into the excluded stomach can result in failed weight loss and subsequent failure of the RYGB procedure.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carucci, L. R., Conklin, R. C., Turner, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482070926</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery for Morbid Obesity: Evaluation of Leak into Excluded Stomach with Upper Gastrointestinal Examination]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>510</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>504</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/511?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Perihepatic Metastases from Ovarian Cancer: Sensitivity and Specificity of CT for the Detection of Metastases with and Those without Liver Parenchymal Invasion]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/511?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To determine retrospectively the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT) for the differentiation of perihepatic metastases with and those without liver parenchymal invasion (LPI) in patients with ovarian cancer by using interpretations of radiologists with different experience levels and staging laparotomy and pathologic examination findings as the reference standards.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Institutional review board approval and waiver of informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA&ndash;compliant study; 121 patients with ovarian cancer (age range, 29&ndash;94 years; mean age, 57.8 years) formed the study group. Two radiologists blinded to patient clinical data (radiologist 1, 6 months of experience; radiologist 2, 2 years 6 months of experience) retrospectively and independently recorded presence of perihepatic metastases, liver regions involved, and presence of LPI by perihepatic metastases visible on CT images. Sensitivities and specificities for detecting the presence of perihepatic metastases and liver regions involved and sensitivities for detecting LPI were calculated.  Statistics were used to analyze interradiologist agreement.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Pathologic examination results showed 66 perihepatic metastases in 43 (36%) of 121 patients. Sixty (91%) of 66 perihepatic metastases did not show signs of LPI and six (9%) did. Sensitivity and specificity combinations for radiologists 1 and 2 were 56% and 87% and 86% and 99%, respectively, for detecting the presence of perihepatic metastases and 46% and 97% and 82% and 100%, respectively, for determining liver regions involved. Radiologists 1 and 2 had sensitivities of 35% and 80%, respectively, for detecting regions with perihepatic metastases without LPI and sensitivities of 50% and 100%, respectively, for detecting regions with perihepatic metastases with LPI.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> CT can be used to detect perihepatic metastases in patients with ovarian cancer and allows for distinction between metastases that invade the liver and those that do not.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akin, O., Sala, E., Moskowitz, C. S., Ishill, N., Soslow, R. A., Chi, D. S., Hricak, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482070371</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Perihepatic Metastases from Ovarian Cancer: Sensitivity and Specificity of CT for the Detection of Metastases with and Those without Liver Parenchymal Invasion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>517</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>511</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/518?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Assessment with Combined Analysis of Static and Dynamic MR Imaging Findings]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/518?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To prospectively analyze static and dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) images simultaneously to determine whether stress urinary incontinence (SUI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and anal incontinence are associated with specific pelvic floor abnormalities.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> This study had institutional review board approval, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. There were 59 women: 15 nulliparous study control women (mean age, 25.6 years) and 44 patients (mean age, 43.4 years), who were divided into four groups according to chief symptom. Static T2-weighted turbo spin-echo images were used in evaluating structural derangements; functional dynamic (cine) balanced fast-field echo images were used in detecting functional abnormalities and recording five measurements of supporting structures. Findings on both types of MR images were analyzed together to determine the predominant defect. Analysis of variance and the Bonferroni <I>t</I> test were used to compare groups.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> In the four patient groups, POP was associated with levator muscle weakness in 16 (47%) of 34 patients, with level I and II fascial defects in seven (21%) of 34 patients, and with both defects in 11 (32%) of 34 patients. SUI was associated with defects of the urethral supporting structures in 25 (86%) of 29 patients but was not associated with bladder neck descent. Levator muscle weakness may lead to anal incontinence in the absence of anal sphincter defects. Measurements of supporting structures were significant (<I>P</I> &lt; .05) in the identification of pelvic floor laxity.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Combined analysis of static and dynamic MR images of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction allowed identification of certain structural abnormalities with specific dysfunctions.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Sayed, R. F., El Mashed, S., Farag, A., Morsy, M. M., Abdel Azim, M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482070974</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Assessment with Combined Analysis of Static and Dynamic MR Imaging Findings]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>530</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>518</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/531?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Prostate Cancer: Relationships between Postbiopsy Hemorrhage and Tumor Detectability at MR Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/531?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To retrospectively evaluate the influence of postbiopsy hemorrhage on the accuracy of tumor detection at T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, dynamic contrast material&ndash;enhanced MR imaging, and diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging of prostate cancer, with histologic findings as the reference standard.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> The institutional review board approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent. Forty male patients aged 62&ndash;84 years (mean age, 71 years) who had prostate cancer underwent MR imaging of the prostate gland after ultrasonographically (US) guided systematic 12-core-specimen biopsy. The mean time between biopsy and MR imaging was 24 days (range, 6&ndash;54 days). T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and DW imaging examinations were performed at 1.5 T. The prostate was divided, according to the biopsy sites, into eight regions on the MR images. Three reviewers in consensus evaluated each region for hemorrhage and prostate cancer. Statistical evaluations were performed with Mann-Whitney <I>U</I>, Ryan, and Spearman rank correlation tests.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Intraglandular hemorrhage was observed in 38 (95%) patients and significantly more often in the peripheral zone (PZ) than in the transition zone (TZ) (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). Degree of hemorrhage did not correlate significantly (<I>P</I> = .536) with time between biopsy and MR imaging. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of combined T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and DW imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer were 69%, 85%, and 78%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were lower for the TZ than for the PZ. Degree of hemorrhage was significantly lower in regions of positive biopsy findings than in regions of negative biopsy findings (<I>P</I> = .001) and correlated negatively with tumor size (<I>P</I> = .043).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Interpretation of combined T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and DW MR image findings can yield reasonable diagnostic accuracy in both the PZ (80% [191 of 240 regions]) and the TZ (74% [59 of 80 regions]).</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tamada, T., Sone, T., Jo, Y., Yamamoto, A., Yamashita, T., Egashira, N., Imai, S., Fukunaga, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482070157</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Prostate Cancer: Relationships between Postbiopsy Hemorrhage and Tumor Detectability at MR Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>539</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>531</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/540?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Embolization of Varicocles: Pretreatment Sperm Motility Predicts Later Pregnancy in Partners of Infertile Men]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/540?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To identify predictors of future pregnancy in partners of infertile men undergoing embolization of varicoceles.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> This study was conducted within local institutional review board guidelines, and written informed consent was obtained. In 223 clinically infertile men (age range, 18&ndash;50 years) with varicoceles and associated oligoteratoasthenospermia, endovascular embolization of the spermatic veins was performed with distal coil embolization and sclerotherapy. Additional anti-inflammatory treatment was initiated if required. Baseline clinical examination, semen specimen, and hormone level findings were compared to follow-up data. Posttreatment pregnancy rate of their healthy female partners was assessed with a standardized questionnaire. Unconditioned logistic regression was used to identify factors among all available clinical and laboratory data predicting treatment success (sired pregnancy during follow-up).</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> A total of 226 of 228 varicoceles in 223 patients were successfully treated. Resolution of varicoceles at clinical examination and ultrasonography (US) was observed in 206 patients (92.4%). Three-month follow-up semen analysis in these patients showed significant improvement in sperm motility (<I>P</I> &lt; .001) and sperm count (<I>P</I> &lt; .001); however, average values remained in the abnormal range (World Health Organization guidelines). In 173 patients, follow-up data were successfully obtained, with pregnancy reported in 45 (26%). Baseline sperm motility was identified as the only significant pretreatment factor (standardized regression coefficient &beta; = 3.285, <I>t</I> = 7.560, <I>P</I> = .006) predicting sired pregnancy. Hormone levels, clinical grading of varicoceles, Doppler US findings, and other semen parameters did not reach statistical significance.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Sperm motility prior to varicocele treatment in infertile men is an important predictor of later pregnancy.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flacke, S., Schuster, M., Kovacs, A., von Falkenhausen, M., Strunk, H. M., Haidl, G., Schild, H. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071675</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Embolization of Varicocles: Pretreatment Sperm Motility Predicts Later Pregnancy in Partners of Infertile Men]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>549</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>540</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/550?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Head and Neck Imaging] Carotid Plaque Morphology and Composition: Initial Comparison between 1.5- and 3.0-T Magnetic Field Strengths]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/550?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To prospectively compare the interpretation and quantification of carotid vessel wall morphology and plaque composition at 1.5-T with those at 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Twenty participants (mean age, 69.8 years [standard deviation] &plusmn; 10.5; 75% men) with 16%&ndash;79% carotid stenosis at duplex ultrasonography were imaged with 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging units with bilateral four-element phased-array surface coils. This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board, and all participants gave written informed consent. Protocols designed for similar signal-to-noise ratios across platforms were implemented to acquire axial T1-weighted, T2-weighted, intermediate-weighted, time-of-flight, and contrast material&ndash;enhanced T1-weighted images. Lumen area, wall area, total vessel area, wall thickness, and presence or absence and area of plaque components were documented. Continuous variables from different field strengths were compared by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and repeated measures analysis. The Cohen  was used to evaluate agreement between 1.5 T and 3.0 T on compositional dichotomous variables.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> There was a strong level of agreement between field strengths for all morphologic variables, with ICCs ranging from 0.88 to 0.96. Agreement in the identification of presence or absence of plaque components was very good for calcification ( = 0.72), lipid-rich necrotic core ( = 0.73), and hemorrhage ( = 0.66). However, the visualization of hemorrhage was greater at 1.5 T than at 3.0 T (14.7% vs 7.8%, <I>P</I> &lt; .001). Calcifications measured significantly (<I>P</I> = .03) larger at 3.0 T, while lipid-rich necrotic cores without hemorrhage were similar between field strengths (<I>P</I> = .9).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> At higher field strengths, the increased susceptibility of calcification and paramagnetic ferric iron in hemorrhage may alter quantification and/or detection. Nevertheless, imaging criteria at 1.5 T for carotid vessel wall interpretation are applicable at 3.0 T.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Underhill, H. R., Yarnykh, V. L., Hatsukami, T. S., Wang, J., Balu, N., Hayes, C. E., Oikawa, M., Yu, W., Xu, D., Chu, B., Wyman, B. T., Polissar, N. L., Yuan, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071114</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Head and Neck Imaging] Carotid Plaque Morphology and Composition: Initial Comparison between 1.5- and 3.0-T Magnetic Field Strengths]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>560</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>550</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Head and Neck Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/561?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Molecular Imaging] Imaging Hypoxia in Orthotopic Rat Liver Tumors with Iodine 124-labeled Iodoazomycin Galactopyranoside PET]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/561?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To evaluate iodine 124 (<SUP>124</SUP>I)-labeled iodoazomycin galactopyranoside (IAZGP) positron emission tomography (PET) in the detection of hypoxia in an orthotopic rat liver tumor model by comparing regions of high <SUP>124</SUP>I-IAZGP uptake with independent measures of hypoxia and to determine the optimal time after injection to depict hypoxia.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> The institutional animal care and use committee approved this study. Morris hepatoma tumors were established in the livers of 15 rats. Tumor oxygenation was measured in two rats with a fluorescence fiberoptic oxygen probe. <SUP>124</SUP>I-IAZGP was coadministered with the established hypoxia markers pimonidazole and EF5 in nine rats; 12-hour PET data acquisition was performed 24 hours later. Tumor cryosections were analyzed with immunofluorescence and autoradiography. In the four remaining rats, serial 20- and 60-minute PET data acquisition was peformed up to 48 hours after tracer administration.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Oxygen probe measurements showed severe hypoxia (&lt;1 mm Hg) distributed evenly throughout tumor tissue. Analysis of cryosections showed diffuse homogeneous uptake of <SUP>124</SUP>I-IAZGP throughout all tumors. The <SUP>124</SUP>I-IAZGP distribution correlated positively with pimonidazole (<I>r</I> = 0.78) and EF5 (<I>r</I> = 0.76) distribution. Tracer uptake in tumors was detectable with PET after 24 hours in seven of nine rats. In rats that underwent serial PET, tumor-to-liver contrast was sufficient to enable detection of hypoxia between 6 and 48 hours after tracer administration. The optimal ratio between signal intensity and tumor-to-liver contrast occurred 6 hours after tracer administration.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Regions of high <SUP>124</SUP>I-IAZGP uptake in orthotopic rat liver tumors are consistent with independent measures of hypoxia; visualization of hypoxia with <SUP>124</SUP>I-IAZGP PET is optimal 6 hours after injection.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riedl, C. C., Brader, P., Zanzonico, P. B., Chun, Y. S., Woo, Y., Singh, P., Carlin, S., Wen, B., Ling, C. C., Hricak, H., Fong, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071421</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Molecular Imaging] Imaging Hypoxia in Orthotopic Rat Liver Tumors with Iodine 124-labeled Iodoazomycin Galactopyranoside PET]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>570</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>561</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Molecular Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/571?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Juvenile versus Adult Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: Appropriate MR Imaging Criteria for Instability]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/571?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To retrospectively compare the sensitivity and specificity of previously described magnetic resonance (MR) imaging criteria for the detection of instability in patients with juvenile or adult osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee, with arthroscopic findings as the reference standard.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board for this HIPAA-compliant study. The study group consisted of 32 skeletally immature patients (25 boys, seven girls; mean age, 14.4 years) with 36 juvenile OCD lesions of the knee and 33 skeletally mature patients (25 men, eight women; mean age, 26.2 years) with 34 adult OCD lesions of the knee. All patients had been evaluated with MR imaging and arthroscopy. MR studies were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists in consensus to determine the presence of previously described MR imaging criteria for OCD instability (ie, high T2 signal intensity rim, surrounding cysts, high T2 signal intensity cartilage fracture line, and fluid-filled osteochondral defect). Sensitivity and specificity of the criteria were calculated separately for juvenile and adult OCD lesions.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Separately, previously described MR imaging criteria for detection of OCD instability were 0%&ndash;88% sensitive and 21%&ndash;100% specific for juvenile OCD lesions and 27%&ndash;54% sensitive and 100% specific for adult OCD lesions. When used together, the criteria were 100% sensitive and 11% specific for instability in juvenile OCD lesions and 100% sensitive and 100% specific for instability in adult OCD lesions.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Previously described MR imaging criteria for OCD instability have high specificity for adult but not juvenile lesions of the knee.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kijowski, R., Blankenbaker, D. G., Shinki, K., Fine, J. P., Graf, B. K., De Smet, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071234</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Musculoskeletal Imaging] Juvenile versus Adult Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: Appropriate MR Imaging Criteria for Instability]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>578</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>571</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Musculoskeletal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/579?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Neuroradiology] Presurgical Functional MR Imaging of Language and Motor Functions: Validation with Intraoperative Electrocortical Mapping]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/579?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To prospectively determine the sensitivity and specificity of functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for mapping language and motor functions in patients with a focal mass adjacent to eloquent cortex, by using intraoperative electrocortical mapping (ECM) as the reference standard.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> The ethics committee approved the study, and patients gave written informed consent. Thirty-four consecutive patients (16 women, 18 men; mean age, 43.2 years) were included who met the following three criteria: They had a focal mass in or adjacent to eloquent cortex of the language or motor system, they had the ability to perform the functional MR imaging task, and they had to undergo surgery with intraoperative ECM. Functional MR imaging with verb generation (<I>n</I> = 17) or finger tapping of the contralateral hand (<I>n</I> = 17) was performed at 1.5 T with a block design and an echo-planar gradient-echo T2*-weighted sequence. Cortex essential for language or hand motor functions was mapped with ECM. A site-by-site comparison between functional MR imaging and ECM was performed with the aid of a neuronavigational device. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated according to task performed, histopathologic findings, and tumor grade. Exact 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each sensitivity and specificity value.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> For 34 consecutive patients, there were 28 with gliomas, two with metastases, one with meningioma, and three with cavernous angiomas. A total of 251 cortical sites were tested with ECM; overall functional MR imaging sensitivity and specificity were 83% and 82%, respectively. Sensitivity (65%) was lower and specificity (93%) was higher in World Health Organization grade IV gliomas compared with grade II (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 79%) and III (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 76%) gliomas. At 3 months after surgery, language proficiency was unchanged in 15 patients; functionality of the contralateral arm was unchanged in 14 patients and improved in one patient.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Functional MR imaging is a sensitive and specific method for mapping language and motor functions.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bizzi, A., Blasi, V., Falini, A., Ferroli, P., Cadioli, M., Danesi, U., Aquino, D., Marras, C., Caldiroli, D., Broggi, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071214</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Neuroradiology] Presurgical Functional MR Imaging of Language and Motor Functions: Validation with Intraoperative Electrocortical Mapping]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>589</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>579</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Neuroradiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/590?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Neuroradiology] Whole-Brain Atrophy Rate and Cognitive Decline: Longitudinal MR Study of Memory Clinic Patients]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/590?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To prospectively determine whole-brain atrophy rate in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD) and its association with cognitive decline, and investigate the risk of progression to dementia in initially nondemented patients given baseline brain volume and whole-brain atrophy rate.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> This study was IRB approved; written informed consent was obtained; and included 65 AD patients (38 women, 27 men; age, 52&ndash;81 years), 45 MCI patients (22 women, 23 men; age, 56&ndash;80 years), 27 patients with subjective complaints (12 women, 15 men; age, 50&ndash;87 years), and 10 healthy controls (six women, four men; age, 53&ndash;80 years). Two magnetic resonance (MR) images were acquired at average interval of 1.8 years &plusmn; 0.7 (standard deviation). Baseline brain volume and whole-brain atrophy rates were measured on three-dimensional T1-weighted MR images (1.0 T; single slab, 168 sections; matrix size, 256 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 256; field of view, 250 mm; voxel size, 1 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 1 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 1.5 mm; repetition time msec/echo time msec/inversion time msec, 15/7/300; and flip angle, 15&deg;). Associations were assessed by using partial-correlations. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate risk of developing dementia.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Baseline brain volume was lowest in AD but did not differ significantly between MCI, subjective complaints, and control groups (<I>P</I> &gt; .38). Whole-brain atrophy rates were higher in AD (&ndash;1.9% per year &plusmn; 0.9) than MCI (&ndash;1.2% per year &plusmn; 0.9, <I>P</I> = .003) patients, who had higher whole-brain atrophy rates than patients with subjective complaints (&ndash;0.7% per year &plusmn; 0.7, <I>P</I> = .03) and controls (&ndash;0.5% per year &plusmn; 0.5, <I>P</I> = .05). Whole-brain atrophy rate correlated with annualized Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) change (<I>r</I> = 0.48, <I>P</I> &lt; .001), while baseline volume did not (<I>r</I> = 0.11, <I>P</I> = .22). Cox models showed that&mdash;after correction for age, sex, and baseline MMSE&mdash;a higher whole-brain atrophy rate was associated with an increased risk of progression to dementia (highest vs lowest tertile [hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.2, 11.4]).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Whole-brain atrophy rate was strongly associated with cognitive decline. In nondemented participants, a high whole-brain atrophy rate was associated with an increased risk of progression to dementia.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sluimer, J. D., van der Flier, W. M., Karas, G. B., Fox, N. C., Scheltens, P., Barkhof, F., Vrenken, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482070938</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Neuroradiology] Whole-Brain Atrophy Rate and Cognitive Decline: Longitudinal MR Study of Memory Clinic Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>598</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>590</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Neuroradiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/599?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Nuclear Medicine] Uterine Tumors: Pathophysiologic Imaging with 16{alpha}-[18F]fluoro-17{beta}-estradiol and 18F Fluorodeoxyglucose PET--Initial Experience]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/599?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To clarify prospectively the relationship between estrogen receptor (ER) expression and glucose metabolism by using 16-[<SUP>18</SUP>F]fluoro-17&beta;-estradiol (FES) and fluorine 18 (<SUP>18</SUP>F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with benign and malignant uterine tumors.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> The institutional review board approved this study, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects. FES and FDG PET studies were performed in 38 patients (mean age, 54.1 years &plusmn; 14.0 [standard deviation]) with benign and malignant uterine tumors to compare differences in tracer accumulation. Regional values of tracer uptake were evaluated by using standardized uptake value (SUV), a normalized value corrected by using injection dose and body weight.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Patients with endometrial carcinoma showed significantly greater mean SUV for FDG (9.6 &plusmn; 3.3) than for FES (3.8 &plusmn; 1.8) (<I>P</I> &lt; .005). Patients with endometrial hyperplasia showed significantly higher mean SUV for FES (7.0 &plusmn; 2.9) than for FDG (1.7 &plusmn; 0.3) (<I>P</I> &lt; .05). Patients with leiomyoma showed significantly higher mean SUV for FES (4.2 &plusmn; 2.4) than for FDG (2.2 &plusmn; 1.1) (<I>P</I> &lt; .005), and patients with sarcoma showed opposite tendencies for tracer accumulation. Tracer uptake in patients with endometrial carcinoma was significantly higher for FDG (<I>P</I> &lt; .001) and significantly lower for FES (<I>P</I> &lt; .05) when compared with values in patients with endometrial hyperplasia. On the other hand, patients with sarcoma showed a significantly higher uptake for FDG (<I>P</I> &lt; .005) and a significantly lower uptake for FES (<I>P</I> &lt; .05) compared with patients with leiomyoma.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> ER expression and glucose metabolism of uterine tumors measured by using PET showed opposite tendencies. PET studies with both FES and FDG could provide pathophysiologic information for the differential diagnosis of uterine tumors.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsujikawa, T., Yoshida, Y., Mori, T., Kurokawa, T., Fujibayashi, Y., Kotsuji, F., Okazawa, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071379</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Nuclear Medicine] Uterine Tumors: Pathophysiologic Imaging with 16{alpha}-[18F]fluoro-17{beta}-estradiol and 18F Fluorodeoxyglucose PET--Initial Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>605</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>599</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Nuclear Medicine</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/606?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Technical Developments] Volumetric Cardiac Quantification by Using 3D Dual-Phase Whole-Heart MR Imaging]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/606?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>This study was approved by the local institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all volunteers and patients. The purpose of the study was to assess ventricular volumes by using three-dimensional (3D) whole-heart data sets acquired during end-systolic and end-diastolic phases during one free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging examination. In five healthy volunteers and 10 patients, 3D dual cardiac phase data sets, short-axis multisection breath-hold images, and through-plane flow images of the great vessels were acquired. Within these data sets, statistic analyses were performed to compare stroke, end-systolic, and end-diastolic volumes for the left ventricle (LV) and the right ventricle (RV). Results showed that the breath-hold multisection approach, the flow measurement approach, and the new dual-phase 3D approach delivered comparable results for quantification of cardiac volumes and function. High correlation values greater than 0.95 were found when these methods were compared, and no significant differences were recognized for stroke, end-systolic, or end-diastolic volumes in either the LV or the RV.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uribe, S., Tangchaoren, T., Parish, V., Wolf, I., Razavi, R., Greil, G., Schaeffter, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071568</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Technical Developments] Volumetric Cardiac Quantification by Using 3D Dual-Phase Whole-Heart MR Imaging]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>614</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>606</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Technical Developments</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/615?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Technical Developments] Xenon Ventilation CT with a Dual-Energy Technique of Dual-Source CT: Initial Experience]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/615?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Although xenon (Xe) ventilation CT has been introduced as a potential method with which to depict regional ventilation, quantification of Xe enhancement has been limited by the variability of lung attenuation caused by different lung volumes between scans. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of Xe ventilation CT with a dual-energy technique. Dual-energy CT was performed in 12 subjects after Xe inhalation. With use of a dual-energy technique, the Xe component could be extracted without any influence from lung volume. Dynamic and static regional ventilation function can be displayed with an exact match to the thin-section CT image.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
<P>Supplemental material: <I><INTER-REF LOCATOR="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/248/2/615/DC1" LOCATOR-TYPE="URL">http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/248/2/615/DC1</INTER-REF></I></P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chae, E. J., Seo, J. B., Goo, H. W., Kim, N., Song, K.-S., Lee, S. D., Hong, S.-J., Krauss, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071482</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Technical Developments] Xenon Ventilation CT with a Dual-Energy Technique of Dual-Source CT: Initial Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>624</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>615</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Technical Developments</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/625?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Imaging] Effect of Nodule Characteristics on Variability of Semiautomated Volume Measurements in Pulmonary Nodules Detected in a Lung Cancer Screening Program]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/625?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To retrospectively assess volume measurement variability in solid pulmonary nodules (volume, 15&ndash;500 mm<SUP>3</SUP>) detected at lung cancer screening and to quantify the independent effects of nodule morphology, size, and location.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> This retrospective study was a substudy of the screening program that was approved by the Dutch Ministry of Health, and all participants provided written informed consent. Two independent readers used semiautomated software to measure the volume of pulmonary nodules detected in 6774 participants aged 50&ndash;75 years (5917 men). Nodules were classified according to their location (purely intraparenchymal, pleural based, juxtavascular, or fissure attached), morphology (smooth, polylobulated, spiculated, or irregular), and size (&le;50 mm<SUP>3</SUP> or &gt;50 mm<SUP>3</SUP>). The level of agreement was expressed by using the absolute values of the relative volume differences (RVDs). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, and odds ratios (ORs) were computed to quantify the independent effects of morphology, location, and size on RVD categories.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Altogether, 4225 nodules in 2239 participants were included. Complete agreement in volume was obtained for 3646 (86%) of the nodules. Disagreement was small (absolute value of RVD &lt; 5%) for 173 (4%) nodules, moderate (absolute value of RVD &ge; 5% but &lt; 15%) for 232 (6%), and large (absolute value of RVD &ge; 15%) for 174 (4%). Multivariate analysis showed that the ORs of volume disagreement were 15.7, 3.1, and 1.9 for irregular, spiculated, and polylobulated nodules, respectively; 3.5, 2.6, and 2.1 for juxtavascular, pleural-based, and fissure-attached nodules, respectively; and 1.3 for large nodules compared with smooth, purely intraparenchymal, and small reference nodules.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Nodule morphology, location, and size influence volume measurement variability, particularly for juxtavascular and irregular nodules.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, Y., van Klaveren, R. J., van der Zaag-Loonen, H. J., de Bock, G. H., Gietema, H. A., Xu, D. M., Leusveld, A. L. M., de Koning, H. J., Scholten, E. T., Verschakelen, J., Prokop, M., Oudkerk, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482070957</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Imaging] Effect of Nodule Characteristics on Variability of Semiautomated Volume Measurements in Pulmonary Nodules Detected in a Lung Cancer Screening Program]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>631</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>625</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Thoracic Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/632?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Imaging] Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Staging: Efficacy Comparison of Integrated PET/CT versus 3.0-T Whole-Body MR Imaging]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/632?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To compare prospectively the diagnostic efficacies of integrated positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and 3.0-T whole-body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for determining TNM stages in non&ndash;small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. The study included 165 patients (125 men, 40 women; mean age, 61 years) with NSCLC proved at pathologic examination who underwent both unenhanced PET/CT and whole-body MR imaging. Pathologic findings for T (<I>n</I> = 123) and N (<I>n</I> = 150) staging and pathologic or follow-up imaging findings (<I>n</I> = 154) for M staging were reference standards. The efficacies of PET/CT and whole-body MR imaging for lung cancer staging were compared by using the McNemar test.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Primary tumors (<I>n</I> = 123 patients) were correctly staged in 101 (82%) patients at PET/CT and in 106 (86%) patients at whole-body MR imaging (<I>P</I> = .263). N stages (<I>n</I> = 150 patients) were correctly determined in 105 (70%) patients at PET/CT and in 102 (68%) patients at whole-body MR imaging (<I>P</I> = .880). Thirty-one (20%) of 154 patients had metastatic lesions. Accuracy for detecting metastases was 86% (133 of 154 patients) at PET/CT, and that at whole-body MR imaging was 86% (132 of 154 patients) (<I>P</I> &gt; .99). Although the differences were not statistically significant, whole-body MR imaging was more useful for detecting brain and hepatic metastases, whereas PET/CT was more useful for detecting lymph node and soft-tissue metastases.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Both PET/CT and 3.0-T whole-body MR imaging appear to provide acceptable accuracy and comparable efficacy for NSCLC staging, but for M-stage determination, each modality has its own advantages.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yi, C. A, Shin, K. M., Lee, K. S., Kim, B.-T., Kim, H., Kwon, O J., Choi, J. Y., Chung, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071822</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Imaging] Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Staging: Efficacy Comparison of Integrated PET/CT versus 3.0-T Whole-Body MR Imaging]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>642</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>632</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Thoracic Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/643?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Imaging] Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Whole-Body MR Examination for M-Stage Assessment--Utility for Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted Imaging Compared with Integrated FDG PET/CT]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/643?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To prospectively and directly compare the capability of whole-body diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging, whole-body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with and that without DW imaging, and integrated fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for M-stage assessment in non&ndash;small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> The institutional review board approved this study; informed consent was obtained from patients. A total of 203 NSCLC patients (109 men, 94 women; mean age, 72 years) prospectively underwent whole-body DW imaging, whole-body MR imaging, and FDG PET/CT. Final diagnosis of the M-stage in each patient was determined on the basis of results of all radiologic and follow-up examinations. Two chest radiologists and two nuclear medicine physicians independently assessed all examination results and used a five-point visual scoring system to evaluate the probability of metastases. Final diagnosis based on each of the methods was made by consensus of two readers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the capability for M-stage assessment among whole-body DW imaging, whole-body MR imaging with and that without DW imaging, and PET/CT on a per-patient basis. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared with the McNemar test.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Area under ROC curve (<I>A<SUB>z</SUB></I>) values of whole-body MR imaging with DW imaging (<I>A<SUB>z</SUB></I> = 0.87, <I>P</I> = .04) and integrated FDG PET/CT (<I>A<SUB>z</SUB></I> = 0.89, <I>P</I> = .02) were significantly larger than that of whole-body DW imaging (<I>A<SUB>z</SUB></I> = 0.79). Specificity and accuracy of whole-body MR imaging with (specificity, <I>P</I> = .02; accuracy, <I>P</I> &lt; .01) and that without DW imaging (specificity, <I>P</I> = .02; accuracy, <I>P</I> = .01) and integrated FDG PET/CT (specificity, <I>P</I> &lt; .01; accuracy, <I>P</I> &lt; .01) were significantly higher than those of whole-body DW imaging.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Whole-body MR imaging with DW imaging can be used for M-stage assessment in NSCLC patients with accuracy as good as that of PET/CT.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ohno, Y., Koyama, H., Onishi, Y., Takenaka, D., Nogami, M., Yoshikawa, T., Matsumoto, S., Kotani, Y., Sugimura, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482072039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Imaging] Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Whole-Body MR Examination for M-Stage Assessment--Utility for Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted Imaging Compared with Integrated FDG PET/CT]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>654</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>643</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Thoracic Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/655?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Thoracic Imaging] Hyperpolarized 3He MR Imaging: Physiologic Monitoring Observations and Safety Considerations in 100 Consecutive Subjects]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/655?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To evaluate the safety of hyperpolarized helium 3 (<SUP>3</SUP>He) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Local institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Physiologic monitoring data were obtained before, during, and after hyperpolarized <SUP>3</SUP>He MR imaging in 100 consecutive subjects (57 men, 43 women; mean age, 52 years &plusmn; 14 [standard deviation]). The subjects inhaled 1&ndash;3 L of a gas mixture containing 300&ndash;500 mL <SUP>3</SUP>He and 0&ndash;2700 mL N<SUB>2</SUB> and held their breath for up to 15 seconds during MR imaging. Heart rate and rhythm and oxygen saturation of hemoglobin as measured by pulse oximetry (Sp<SCP>o</SCP><SUB>2</SUB>) were monitored continuously throughout each study. The effects of <SUP>3</SUP>He MR imaging on vital signs and Sp<SCP>o</SCP><SUB>2</SUB> and the relationship between pulmonary function, number of doses, and clinical classification (healthy volunteers, patients with asthma, heavy smokers, patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema, and patients with lung cancer) and the lowest observed Sp<SCP>o</SCP><SUB>2</SUB> were assessed. Any subjective symptoms were noted.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Except for a small postimaging decrease in mean heart rate (from 78 beats per minute &plusmn; 13 to 73 beats per minute &plusmn; 11, <I>P</I> &lt; .001), there was no effect on vital signs. A mean transient decrease in Sp<SCP>o</SCP><SUB>2</SUB> of 4% &plusmn; 3 was observed during the first minute after gas inhalation (<I>P</I> &lt; .001) in 77 subjects who inhaled a dose of 1 L for 10 seconds or less, reaching a nadir of less than 90% at least once in 20 subjects and of less than 85% in four subjects. There was no correlation between the lowest Sp<SCP>o</SCP><SUB>2</SUB> and pulmonary function parameters other than baseline Sp<SCP>o</SCP><SUB>2</SUB> (<I>r</I> = 0.36, <I>P</I> = .001). The lowest mean Sp<SCP>o</SCP><SUB>2</SUB> varied by 1% between the first and second and second and third doses (<I>P</I> &lt; .001) and was unrelated to clinical classification (<I>P</I> = .40). Minor subjective symptoms were noted by 10 subjects. No serious adverse events occurred.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Hyperpolarized <SUP>3</SUP>He MR imaging can be safely performed in healthy subjects, heavy smokers, and those with severe obstructive airflow limitation, although unpredictable transient desaturation suggests that potential subjects should be carefully screened for comorbidities.</P>
<P>&copy; 